**冬至团圆** *HAPPY REUNION DAY*

**冬至团圆**  *HAPPY REUNION DAY*
*HAPPY REUNION DAY*
Malaysia party
Party Gerakan Rakyat Malaysia :
* sub party of the Barisan Nasional (Ruling Alliance for Federal Government)

{ PGRM } :

Malaysia party
Malaysian Indian Congress :
* Dominant party and co-founder of the Barisan Nasional (Ruling Alliance for Federal Government)

{ MIC } :

MIC TWITTER

Malaysia party
Malaysian Chinese Association :
* Dominant party and co-founder of the Barisan Nasional (Ruling Alliance for Federal Government)

{ MCA } :

MCA Twitter

Malaysia party
United Malays National Organisation :
* Dominant party and founder of the Barisan Nasional (Ruling Alliance for Federal Government)

{ UMNO } :

UMNO Twitter

[myPARTY] right news:

{ pro-BN Bloggers }:

[ the 3rd PARTY ]

the 3RD PARTY TWITTER

Tuesday, December 30, 2008

回教党再来一回, 民联肯定会屌臭吗 ?

30th December Malaysiaparty 's [NOW] News of Week
(picked from Malaysiakini.com) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/95411

12月30日 党讯精選
(转摘自《当今大马》 Malaysiakini ) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/95411

卡巴星警告回教党要知本身界限
坦言行动党瓜登助选热忱受影响

李伟伦 12月24日 下午4点52分

在瓜登国席补选前夕,民联内部却突然因为回教党副主席的一席执政后落实回教刑事法言论而闹分歧。

民主行动党全国主席卡巴星今日措辞强烈地警告回教党要知道行动党的忍耐度有限,该党更需知道本身的界限在哪。

他表示,尽管行动党仍会为回教党的补选候选人助选,惟助选的热忱肯定已受到影响。

他也再次促请人民公正党实权领袖安华,必须打破沉默,挺身表明立场,因为此事已关乎公众利益。

声称回教党公信力受损

被称为“日落洞之虎”的卡巴星,显然对回教党副主席胡桑慕沙的回教刑事法言论,仍未释怀,不断“提醒”回教党在行事前,必须顾及民联盟党的共识。

“我希望他们往后可以更加小心,我相信回教党的公信力已因胡桑慕沙的言论,受到影响。”

最重要的是公正党实权领袖(安华)必须表明立场,打破沉默,他不能再保持安静。”

“行动党已经开腔,因为这是一个关系公众利益的课题。如今已是时候让行动党促请回教党,他们的行事有个界限,而我们的忍耐度也有个限度。”

重申1999年落败经验

卡巴星也引述替阵在1999年的大选成绩,提醒回教党勿忘历史教训

他说,替阵在1999年发布的联合竞选宣言中,内容并不包括成立一个回教国,惟回教党却在选举两天前单方面宣布,一旦夺下登嘉楼州,就要在登州成立回教州。

这造成了我们的候选人,在自己的堡垒区落马,包括(行动党顾问)林吉祥和我自己都落败。

“阿巴斯可为回教党上课”

卡巴星表示,曾担任回教党登州行政议员的前最高法院院长沙烈阿巴斯,曾在一宗案件中裁决,我国是一个世俗国而非回教国。

他强调,回教党不能违抗宪法,也不能违抗当时我国最高级法庭,即最高法院所作出的裁决。

“回教党可以去询问沙烈阿巴斯,或许他可以给回教党上一堂课。”

他也表示,在308政治海啸后,人民殷切期盼两线制成型,回教党应该避免“击沉自己的船”。

认为胡桑慕沙已撤立场

回教党副主席胡桑慕沙是在星期日于吉兰丹州的一项政治论坛上,受到巫青团副团长凯里的逼问时表示,若民联执政中央,回教党将推动实行回教刑事法。

不过,由于引起一片哗然,胡桑在相隔一日后即澄清,若无法获得民联其他两个盟党,即行动党及公正党的支持,回教党就必须搁置落实回教刑事法的意愿。

对此,卡巴星把之诠释为,胡桑慕沙已撤回相关立场,并希望回教党不会再重提此事。

询及是否圈套一时语塞

由于胡桑当时是在巫青团副团长凯里的挑战下,才发表推行回教刑事法的言论,于是记者就询问卡巴星,是否同意这是一个巫统所设下的圈套。

一向口才便给的卡巴星,却罕见语塞数秒后才表示,“嗯,这很难说,但不管怎样,就算有人设下陷阱,胡桑也必须小心在意,勿掉入陷阱中。”
声称回教党公信力受损
重申1999年落败经验
认为胡桑慕沙已撤立场
询及是否圈套一时语塞
(above picked from http://malaysiakini.com/news/95411)

选举前耍戏 {回教党不会单边行动实施[回教刑事法]!}

30th December Malaysiaparty 's [NOW] News of Week
(picked from Malaysiakini.com) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/95292

12月30日 党讯精選
(转摘自《当今大马》 Malaysiakini ) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/95292

执政后实施回教刑事法论掀波
胡桑澄清:没盟党支持难落实

12月22日 晚上8点02分
因发表民联执政中央必实施回教刑事法的言论,而掀起政坛一阵哗然的回教党副主席兼吉兰丹州行政议员胡桑慕沙今日澄清说,若无法获得民联其他两个盟党,即行动党及公正党的支持,回教党就必须搁置落实回教刑事法的意愿。

民联签署协议不单边行动

胡桑慕沙指出,这是因为民联三党已经在今年8月签署协议,同意任何政策的改变,都必须预先获得民联成员党的一致同意。

他也保证,回教党不会采取单边行动。所有的政策必须获得各方的同意。

遭凯里质问发表惊人言论

胡桑慕沙是在一项吉兰丹州哥打峇鲁举行的“大马政治的转变”政治论坛上,与巫青团副团长凯里同台时,遭到凯里指责回教党领袖自从在308大选之后,即摒弃及漠视回教刑事法,并质问若民联成功在916夺取中央政权后是否会落实回教刑事法。

结果当时他就回应说,一旦民联执政中央政府,回教党必定会实施回教刑事法。

也是吉兰丹州行政议员的胡桑慕沙强调,实施回教刑事法,不仅是回教党的责任,而是所有回教徒的责任,包括巫统的领导层都责无旁贷。

不过论坛另一名主讲人,即国际回教大学法律系教授阿都阿兹博士则表示,州政府无权落实刑事法,因为那是处于中央政府的权限之下。

凯里当晚支持隔日却改口

根据《星报》星期日的报道,论坛主持人国大政治系讲师莫哈末阿谷斯随后也“火上加油”,反问凯里若他在明年3月的巫统党选中,成功出任巫青团长之后,是否会支持推行刑事法?

结果凯里笑着回答说,他将会支持落实回教刑事法。凯里的回答,顿时引起回教党支持者高喊口号。唯凯里在隔日的《星报》报道(即今日),马上改口否认他曾经说过这番话,并说一切将维持现状。

在胡桑慕沙的言论出街之后,民主行动党国会领袖林吉祥马上发表声明,除了强调推行回教刑事法并不是民联政策之外,并敦促胡桑澄清其言论,否则将令华裔选民感到不安。

也是怡保东区国会议员的林吉祥表示,若未加以澄清,胡桑的言论不仅将让在1月17日瓜拉登嘉楼的11%华裔选民感到不安,同时将引起其他登嘉楼州及全国马来人及非马来人更大的不安与反感。
民联签署协议不单边行动
遭凯里质问发表惊人言论
凯里当晚支持隔日却改口

(above picked from http://malaysiakini.com/news/95292)

Toppling <=> Hudud; Anwar main Concern ? Hudud <-> Toppling; toppling <-> hudud ...

30th December Malaysiaparty 's [NOW] News of Week
(picked from themalaysianinsider.com) :
http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/index.php/malaysia/14777-anwar-eyes-east-malaysia-despite-pacts-troubles

Anwar eyes East Malaysia despite pact’s troubles
KUALA LUMPUR, Dec 25 — While his allies argue over hudud laws and fret over the wobbling economy in their five states, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim has taken over as liaison chairman for both Sabah and Sarawak in Parti Keadilan Rakyat's (PKR) efforts widen its base and capture the Borneo states.

The opposition leader, who made a triumphant parliamentary comeback in August, is initially eyeing Sarawak in the next state elections due by 2011 as chief minister Tan Sri Abdul Taib Mahmud faces increased opposition to his 27 years in power.

Sabah is a different proposition as the ruling Barisan Nasional coalition is dominant with 57 of the 60 seats in the state assembly.
malaysiakini to post this ==>
But consumed with garnering more support from both states, Anwar has been conspicuously silent about the controversy over implementing Islamic criminal Hudud laws that flared up again this week between Pas and DAP, and Pakatan Rakyat state governments’ efforts to mitigate the fallout from a growing global recession.

“Some things are out of his hand. Anwar will quietly handle Pas and DAP behind the scenes but the economy will take some work,” a Pakatan Rakyat source told The Malaysian Insider, adding the electoral pact had made suggestions in the budget debate.

The PKR supreme council met late Monday night but party president Datuk Seri Wan Azizah Wan Ismail, who is Anwar’s wife, only announcement was that Anwar has taken over as liaison chairman for Sabah and Sarawak, citing the appointment as proof of the party's focus to struggle for the people from Perlis to Sarawak.

“The agenda to bring change in Sabah and Sarawak needs the support from all levels of society. Sarawak will have its state elections soon and Datuk Seri Anwar’s appointment as state liaison chairman for both states justify our concern for problems there and is significant in Pakatan Rakyat’s power transition to Putrajaya,” she said in a statement issued on Tuesday.

The Pakatan Rakyat electoral pact, which groups PKR, Pas and DAP, has 81 out of the 222 seats in the federal parliament. BN has 137 seats while the Sabah Progressive Party (SAPP), which pulled out of BN in September, has two seats and one to Independent Datuk Ibrahim Ali. The Kuala Terengganu seat is vacant with the by-election on Jan 17.

PKR’s focus for the Borneo states has been apparent when Anwar predicted he could form capture Putrajaya by Malaysia Day with help from 30 federal lawmakers after Pakatan Rakyat made a historic upset in the March 8 General Elections where BN lost its customary two-thirds parliamentary majority and four more states to the opposition.

Since then, only SAPP has pulled out of the 14-member BN coalition but has chosen to remain independent in Parliament although its president Datuk Yong Teck Lee is close to the sacked deputy prime minister, who has yet to fulfil his prediction to unseat BN from power.

Anwar, in a posting at his weblog today, called the changes routine and said the state leadership in the party are merely coordinators in an effort to dispel notions of consolidating power for himself as “experienced leaders will be act as advisors at the national level while the new leadership will get exposure apart from introducing new approaches to attract new members”.

“Personally, I am not inclined to coordinate activities in Sabah and Sarawak. In fact, even Wilayah Persekutuan asked me to help but I feel that Tan Sri Khalid as Selangor Menteri Besar, is better there,” Anwar said, adding the appointments will be reviewed regularly.

He also said his offer to help both PKR state liaison committees has been announced before and he hoped to get support from all quarters in both states.

Apart from Anwar heading both Sabah and Sarawak, and Khalid leading Selangor and Wilayah Persekutuan, the other state leaders are Datuk Fauzi Abdul Rahman (Pahang), Datuk Zahrain Mohamed Hashim (Penang), Datuk Kamarul Baharin Abbas (Negri Sembilan), Ahmad Kassim (Kedah), Abdul Aziz Abdul Kadir (Kelantan), Johari Shafie (Perlis), Khalid Jaafar (Malacca), Dr Zaliha Mustaffa (Johor), Osman Abdul Rahman (Perak) and Wan Rahim Wan Hamzah (Terengganu).
(above picked http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/index.php/malaysia/14777-anwar-eyes-east-malaysia-despite-pacts-troubles)

蔡添强并非对“卡巴星的言论“不敬” ! 周美芬该抨的不敢講; 卻对敵党的内部矛盾滔滔不绝 !!

30th December Malaysiaparty 's [NOW] News of Week
(picked from Malaysiakini.com) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/95422

12月30日 党讯精選
(转摘自《当今大马》 Malaysiakini ) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/95422

辩护公正党回教课题立场鲜明
林秀凌:各造无须再大做文章

12月24日 傍晚6点13分
针对回教党副主席胡桑慕沙日前发表落实回教刑事法的言论,公正党澄清该党宣传主任蔡添强已履行他身为党全国宣传主任职责,就事论事代表公正党阐明该党在此课题上的立场。

人民公正党中央宣传局媒体协调主任林秀凌指出,蔡添强并非对“行动党主席卡巴星的言论“不敬”,身为民联主要领导之一,卡巴星和其他领导有同等的责任澄清公众对民联的疑惑。

她澄清,蔡添强指“没有必要凡事都要安华亲自回应”,意指任何一个民联成员党的领导,可在已经达致共识的政策和议题上发言,而蔡氏身为公正党全国宣传主任,必然有责任代表党和民联阐明立场。

她说,人民公正党对回教国、回教刑事法、新经济政策等课题,已多次发表鲜明立场。民联也已联邦民主宪法为我们斗争的共识,此事无须多次重提。

与国阵一言堂模式不同

林秀凌今天也发表文告抨击马华全国妇女组主席周美芬不敢批判巫统的霸权,更不敢抗议巫统漠视国阵成员党的意愿,强行种族主义的政策,反而在此事件上大做文章,这也显示出周氏对民联的执政纲领,以及与国阵截然不同的运作一窍不通。

“民联由人民公正党、民主行动党和回教党联合组成,各党领导平起平坐,在任何课题和政策上有分歧,大可直接和党领袖反映立场和交流;民联秉持民主开放的政治文化,任何课题都可以自由讨论,各党都可以商讨不同的党议程。”

她继称,民联三党领导必须在民联会议上达成共识后,才可对外宣布立场或看法,任何成员党要做出任何改变之前,也必须获得民联认同,再由民联领袖安华作出公布。

“这与巫统主导的国阵截然不同。周美芬也许认同巫统的霸权及一言堂文化,我们实在无法苟同。”

民联纲领没纳入刑事法

林秀凌也是公正党全国青年团中委,她认为,无论如何回教党领袖发表有关回教刑事法的言论,不是什么新鲜课题,不过民联的政治纲领并没有将之纳入其中。

“民联成立于今年4月1日,是以7项大原则作为执政纲领,即维护联邦宪法精神、确保宗教与文化自由、透明化行政机制、建立公正司法制度、推行全民经济议程、保障媒体和资讯自由、塑造民主社会。”
与国阵一言堂模式不同
民联纲领没纳入刑事法

(above picked from http://malaysiakini.com/news/95422)

庆幸916失败告终, 否则大马已成回教刑事法的回教国 ! ! !

30th December Malaysiaparty 's [NOW] News of Week
(picked from Malaysiakini.com) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/95246

12月30日 党讯精選
(转摘自《当今大马》 Malaysiakini ) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/95246

回教党副主席胡桑慕沙日前所提出的“若民联执政中央就会全面实施回教法”,已经引起极大的回响,甚至可能成为下个月举行的瓜拉登嘉楼补选中,其中一个热门的竞选课题。

民主行动党国会领袖林吉祥今日发表声明,除了强调推行回教刑事法并不是民联政策之外,并敦促胡山澄清其言论,否则将令华裔选民感到不安。

行动党坚持世俗国立场不变

林吉祥也是怡保东区国会议员,他表示,若未加以澄清,胡桑的言论不仅将让在1月17日瓜拉登嘉楼的11%华裔选民感到不安,同时将引起其他登嘉楼州及全国马来人及非马来人更大的不安与反感。

“实行回教刑事法不是民联的政策,胡桑应澄清他实际上说了些什么。”

“民主行动党坚持我们的先辈们,在国家于51年前独立时所达致的社会契约中同意世俗立国的立场,而这个立场由始至终不变。”

李伟杰指责回教党违反宣言

另一边厢,马华中央党部发言人李伟杰对民联的人民主权沦为“回教刑事法”感到非常失望,更对这种欺骗人民的政治手段感到遗憾。

他说,日前回教党副主席胡桑慕沙所提出的“若民联执政中央就会全面实施回教法”,已经全面违反该党福利国的宣言,形如背叛选民。

也是马华新闻局主任的李伟杰指出,在308大选前,回教党为了捞取开明的巫裔选民及非巫裔的选票,堂皇地推出了福利国的宣言。

“当时公正党与行动党全力支持回教党,更在308之后组成民联,共同执政5州。数月前民联尝试要拉拢国阵国会议员跳槽,以夺取中央政权,不过最后以失败告终。”

马华庆幸国阵议员站稳立场,没有轻信安华的花招。如果当初真的出现变天,可能大马现在已经成为实行回教刑事法的回教国。”

促民联书面保证不实行回教国

他说,为了安抚人民因回教国议题而引起的紧张情绪,马华促请民联应效仿之前三党签署的协议,白纸黑字地做出以下的书面保证:

1)根据宪法,马来西亚的政体是君主立宪制,并通过民选的议会制度选出国家领导人,任何人都不许通过回教国的实行,尝试颠覆宪法;

2)在联邦宪法之下,回教只是大马官方宗教,人民也享有宗教自由,绝对不能通过回教刑事法剥夺各族人民的宗教自由。

他说,公正党与行动党的国会议席占有59席,远远超过只有23席的回教党。若这两党无法说服回教党放弃成立回教国的野心,并保证大马不会沦为回教国,那么两党就应该探讨退出民联或开除回教党。
行动党坚持世俗国立场不变
李伟杰指责回教党违反宣言
促民联书面保证不推回教国

(above picked from http://malaysiakini.com/news/95246)

Monday, December 29, 2008

Anwar ~ Silent means Consent ~ Hudud, ok ?

29th December Malaysiaparty 's [SPot] Special Report
(picked from themalaysianinsider.com) :
http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/index.php/malaysia/14756-pressure-on-anwar-to-clarify-pr-stand-on-hudud-grows


Pressure on Anwar to clarify PR stand on hudud grows
By Shannon Teoh
KUALA LUMPUR, Dec 24 — More voices have joined the roiling debate over hudud, with Wanita MCA adding to the number of those calling for Opposition Leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim to clarify Pakatan Rakyat’s (PR) stand on the matter.
malaysiakini to post this ==>
Earlier today, DAP chairman Karpal Singh had also repeated his call for Anwar to “break his silence, as DAP has done so” with regards to the support for hudud by Pas, the third partner of the coalition.

Pas vice-president Datuk Husam Musa had said that the Islamist party has not forgotten its aim to implement hudud, which prescribes amputation, whipping and stoning for criminal offences, should it come into power.

When DAP criticised the statement, Pas spiritual leader Datuk Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat challenged DAP to make its case as to why hudud laws are not acceptable.

“Husam’s statement has resulted in anxiety among non-Muslims in the country. Pas firmly insisting on introducing hudud has ignored the fact that Malaysia is a multi-racial and multi-religious country and the spirit of Federal Constitution”, Wanita MCA chief Datin Paduka Chew Mei Fun said today.

Given that Karpal and DAP secretary-general Lim Guan Eng have already asked Anwar to clarify, Chew said that the de facto PKR leader must “respect the request of the two DAP leaders and respond to Husam's remark accordingly.

If Anwar decides to keep quiet, there are only two possibilities, one; Anwar agrees with the remark made by Husam to implement hudud or DAP has been marginalised in PR,” she said.

Karpal had this morning said that the backing of hudud was hurting Pas's credibility and it should be more careful about breaking ranks in the future.

He reminded reporters of the electoral alliance in 1999 where Pas had agreed not to include the formation of an Islamic state in the manifesto.

However, two days before the election, Pas announced it would establish an Islamic state if it took over the state government of Terengganu. Karpal insisted that this proclamation had cost many DAP leaders, including himself and Lim Kit Siang, to lose in the general elections.

With that in mind, he said that DAP had limited “political patience” but was satisfied for now that Husam has backtracked in stating that Pas must obtain a consensus from its PR partners.

“We will still campaign and give our full support to whichever candidate is selected for the Kuala Terengganu by-election,” he assured.
(above picked from http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/index.php/malaysia/14756-pressure-on-anwar-to-clarify-pr-stand-on-hudud-grows)

两头蛇应表明回教法立场 ! ! !

29th December Malaysiaparty 's [NOW] News of Week
(picked from Malaysiakini.com) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/95343

12月29日 党讯精選
(转摘自《当今大马》 Malaysiakini ) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/95343

安华公正党不能再保持沉默
民主行动党主席卡巴星今日发表文告,要求国会反对党领袖安华表明对回教党坚持要落实回教刑事法的立场。

“面对(吉兰丹州务大臣)聂阿兹不惜一切要在国内落实回教刑事法的最后通牒,人民公正党实权领袖安华不能再保持沉默,公正党应该通过其最高领袖发表看法。”

回教党副主席胡桑慕沙表明该党一旦执政将实施回教刑事法的言论,恰好碰上瓜拉登嘉楼补选即将“开战”,其言论马上成为国阵瞄准攻击民联的补选课题。

民主行动党最高领袖包括秘书长林冠英、资深领袖林吉祥与卡巴星都在第一时间明确反对回教刑事法,相较之下人民公正党领袖则鲜少主动评论此事,目前表明态度反对的只有宣传主任蔡添强和雪州大臣卡立。

回教法破坏民联大选后成就

卡巴星促请聂阿兹确保回教党停止在国内推动回教刑事法,因为这只会破坏民联在308大选后所创下的成就。

“面对行动党的强力反对,回教党恫言要一意孤行落实回教刑事法,对回教党来说只会构成反效果。”

就连穆斯林也不认同回教法

他指出,回教刑事法不仅遭到非穆斯林所反对,就连一些穆斯林也不认同,强行落实只会破坏种族和谐。

“回教党不应只考虑短期政治利益,反而破坏了国内各民族的长期利益。”

卡巴星也提醒聂阿兹,联邦宪法清楚表明马来西亚是世俗国,不容实施回教刑事法;1988年最高法院五司一致认为马来西亚是世俗国,而且领导五司的前最高法院院长敦沙列阿巴斯,曾在回教党执政登嘉楼时出任州行政议员。

“回教党领袖包括聂阿兹,不应再不断地藐视联邦宪法,坚持推行回教刑事法。”
安华公正党不能再保持沉默
回教法破坏民联大选后成就
就连穆斯林也不认同回教法

(part of the above picked from http://malaysiakini.com/news/95343)

两位青年领袖-凯里胡桑, 徐徐带出回教刑事法 !

29th December Malaysiaparty 's [NOW] News of Week
(picked from Malaysiakini.com) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/95342

12月29日 党讯精選
(转摘自《当今大马》 Malaysiakini ) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/95342

揶揄胡桑回教法立场大转弯
凯里援引可兰经文震惊四座

12月23日 下午4点49分
虽然巫青团副团长凯里与回教党副主席胡桑慕沙上周的同台辩论已经告一段落,但是凯里今日继续通过部落格,揶揄这名吉兰丹州行政议员尽管信誓旦旦推行回教刑事法,但是最终却轻易向民主行动党压力低头。

“他(胡桑)信誓旦旦要在马来西亚推行回教刑事法的言论尚未退热,就已经在行动党的压力下低头认输。”

凯里与胡桑慕沙上周末在吉兰丹州哥打峇鲁举行的“大马政治的转变”政治论坛同台辩论,遭到凯里指责回教党领袖自从在308大选之后,即摒弃及漠视回教刑事法,并质问若民联成功在916夺取中央政权后是否会落实回教刑事法。

胡桑两度重申将推回教法

凯里在部落格撰文说,当时候胡桑慕沙回答说,“我们将会做”。当凯里再次向胡桑求证时,胡桑也举手再度强调,“我们将会做”。

凯里进一步揶揄,在胡桑发表言论不到24小时,行动党国会领袖林吉祥对胡桑的言论提出质疑,并强调回教刑事法并非民联的政策。

他说,在行动党的抨击与压力下,在哥打峇鲁政治论坛上看来斗志高昂的胡桑,突然萎缩及向行动党低头。

“胡桑在本身阵营向回教党中坚支持者保证,一旦将会推行回教刑事法,才不到两天的时间就投降了,并声称推行回教刑事法必须获得民联其他‘资深’盟党的同意。”

质问回教党原则去了哪里?

他批评,胡桑的言论在极短时间内大转弯,再一次证明回教党必须向行动党俯首称臣。

“胡桑在致开幕词时所提出的回教党原则去了哪里?难道原则是可以如此轻易丢弃?”

评论凯里比胡桑略胜一筹

另一方面,马来双周刊《政治》(Siasah)编辑莫哈末沙余迪(Mohd Sayuti Omar)也在部落格撰文,声称胡桑在当晚的表现不如凯里,甚至多次跌入自己多设下的陷阱。

他说,尽管胡桑在这个於回教党大本营举行的论坛开始时显得非常自信,并对国阵与巫统做出各种批评,但是凯里过后一出场的表现却令人惊艳,并频频对胡桑做出反击,直到胡桑哑口无言。

凯里援引可兰经震惊四座

他说,一出场即援引可兰经句子的凯里震惊四座,指国阵目前正推行政治转变,包括成立反贪委员会、司法委员会与修改大专法令。

针对胡桑指308大选已经改变了巫统与国阵,凯里也反唇相讥,指回教党也在这场政治海啸中深受其害,把国会反对党领袖的宝座拱手让给在2004年仅获得一个议席的人民公正党。

凯里也表示,回教党无需以出让霹雳州务大臣为荣,因为州的权力仍然真正掌握在行动党的手上。

凯里甚至提出疑问,选民在308大选是否真的改变倾向,抑或只是投下反对票,并且会在问题解决后回到国阵的怀抱。

针对胡桑批评巫统没有奉行真正的回教教义,凯里提出反问,为何回教党又与其他并非奉行相同回教理念的政党组成人民联盟?不过,胡桑反击说,行动党对于回教的认知,无疑的远比巫统还要好。

为“权力狂”指责激烈交锋

当胡桑批评凯里权力狂,包括凯里曾经批评公选盟举行的示威犹如猴子,并且在峇东铺补选时号称要埋葬安华等。不过,凯里也不甘示弱,举起腕表质问安华的916变天计划难道不是权力狂吗?

双方一来一往的激烈交锋,加上双方支持者的喧哗与掌声,让整个礼堂沸腾起来。

接着,轮到凯里主动出击,他抛出了回教刑事法的课题,质问胡桑一旦民联执政后是否会加以推行。

虽然胡桑明知道这是一个陷阱,但是他却不得不做出回应。他一面回答,一面把问题推给巫统说,“我们将会推行,但是如果你是真心要推行回教刑事法,那么你就应该在巫统大会上提出来”。

作法自毙的凯里显然楞了一下,无法回应胡桑的企图从这个课题上抽身而出,凯里并无法保证将在巫统大会上提出回教刑事法的课题。

凯里:57分,胡桑:43分

莫哈末沙余迪评论说,这两位未来马来政治明星在比较上,胡桑显得比较情绪化与受到压力,而凯里则以做客的心态显得谦虚及开放,并且做好心理和资料准备面对数以千计的回教党支持者。

他也给两人打分,从勇气、演讲姿态与辩论的精神上,凯里获得57分,而胡桑只获得43分。
胡桑两度重申将推回教法
为“权力狂”指责激烈交锋
凯里:57分,胡桑:43分
(above picked from http://malaysiakini.com/news/95342)

Sunday, December 28, 2008

[瓜登补选]=候任首相=安华或纳吉 ?

28th December Malaysiaparty 's [NOW] News of Week
(picked from Malaysiakini.com) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/95173

12月28日 党讯精選
(转摘自《当今大马》 Malaysiakini ) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/95173

马来选民对安华与纳吉的公投?
瓜登补选冲击力比峇东埔更大

王德齐 12月19日 傍晚6点27分
kuala terengganu parliament seat by election 2008 051208预料巫统和回教党将会在本星期六及来临的星期日,陆续揭橥本身的候选人,为备受瞩目的瓜拉登嘉楼国会议席补选加温。

虽然双方极可能委派亲民的当地领袖上阵,但是这场远离首都权力中心,位于东海岸城镇,看似受限于地方格局的补选,其实会比国会反对党领袖兼公正党实权领袖安华,在8月亲自挂帅上阵的峇东埔补选来得更激烈,并将对未来政局产生牵一发动全身的影响

这是因为这场补选,不仅是两名“候任首相”即安华与现任副首相纳吉在马来社群支持率的一次民意公投,同时也牵动回教党党内两股倾轧势力的消涨。

占了瓜登88%人口的马来选民会是这场补选最关键的选票,预料将成为朝野政党的主要争夺对象。

纳吉明年接棒前的试金石

对巫统来说,瓜登补选是对纳吉公信力的一次“试金石”,亦是针对其主打的“马来主权”(Ketuanan Melayu)意识形态的一次严峻考验。

najib finance ministry pc 220908 02若能够保住这个由马来选民占绝大多数,曾多次易手的选区,巫统能够宣称纳吉(左图)已经获得马来社群的民意背书,来接掌首相及巫统主席的权柄。

相对于阿都拉在308全国大选及峇东埔补选,接连遭受重挫;成功赢得补选的纳吉,将会被视为成功带领巫统止血、复苏及东山再起的英雄。

而巫统也可坚称,其鼓动马来民族主义情绪的政治伎俩奏效,更希望发挥“西瓜偎大边”的心理效应,促使这两场选举中大举背弃国阵的非马来选票回笼。

这也将意味着巫统不遗余力强打的“马来主权”论,已成功逆转民联所倡导的“新政治”浪潮。而安华及公正党提呈的“人民主权”论(Ketuanan Rakyat),回教党的中庸福利国路线,已遭挫败。

因此毫不意外,纳吉在上周六到瓜登启动国阵的竞选机关时,明确地传达其“破釜沉舟” ,只许胜利不许败的决心。他放话表示,瓜登补选将是国阵,尤其是巫统自峇东埔补选失利后重新站起来的起点,以向外界传达一个清晰的讯息,即国阵依然是人民的选择。

巫统或委形象清新者上阵

据悉,不敢掉以轻心的巫统,准备派出一名没有争议性,形象清新的当地领袖担任候选人,试图将这场补选定调为地方性的战役,打“亲民牌”来争取选民的支持。

此举旨在疏解登州巫统严重的派系倾轧问题。登州巫统308大选前后曾爆发一连串基层公开抗议临时撤换候选人,以及登州皇室插手干预导致州务大臣难产的问题。

wan farid wan salleh副内政部长兼瓜登区部主席旺阿末法立(左图)原本是最热门的人选,但随着他继续获委为上议员,其出线机会已减弱。此外,旺法立的胞兄兼前行政议员旺希山也被指人缘差,导致他在大选中就以31票“阴沟里翻船”,以微差蝉联失败。

巫统另外4名热门人选是瓜登区部署理主席莫哈末萨布里阿威(Mohd Sabri Alwi)、登州教育局助理主任朱比尔恩邦(Zuber Embong)、同名的登州联委会宣传主任莫哈末朱比尔恩邦(Mohd Zuber Embong)和登州联委会财政罗斯兰阿旺(Roslan Awang Chik)。

采用1人5户制度紧密盯人

此外,巫统也会加强基层的拉票工作,并将采纳更紧密的“人盯人”策略,从过往的1人10户制(ketua 10),缩小至1人5户制(ketua 5),出尽全力抢攻马来选票。

亦考验安华的马来支持率


pkr congress ceramah 291108 anwar1在民联方面,安华(左图)也一样急需一场胜利,来证明马来选民已彻底否决巫统的“马来主权”论以,并肯定他的马来选民支持率比纳吉更高或处于比总。

巫统在峇东埔补选时就大肆玩弄“种族牌”,频频攻击安华的“人民主权”论,背叛了马来民族,但安华最终却以更大的多数票胜出。不过,民联在瓜登的考验,远比半城乡的峇东埔来得严峻,因为这个马来腹地选区的马来选民比例更高,也处于更为保守的乡区地区。

此外,根据
独立民调(Merdeka Center)在峇东埔后进行的民意调查,安华在整体选民中的支持率,稍微超过纳吉,即39.3%比33.8%。但是在马来社群方面,纳吉却以47.3%胜过安华的32.5%的支持率。

根据民联内部调查显示,他们目前仍掌握半数的马来选票支持,而其中7成的年青人选票更是倾向在野党。虽然民调结果看似非常乐观,但最终仍必须经过选举的洗礼,才能够证明民联的新政治路线,获得马来选民的亲睐。

瓜登补选成绩更客观中立

另外一个令瓜登补选备受瞩目的因素,则是其成绩会比峇东埔补选来得更为客观和中立。

峇东埔毕竟是安华占据多年的老巢,民间存在着一股“安华情意结”,但是瓜登却曾多次在国阵和在野党之间易手,并非任何政党的“安全区”。

kuala terengganu parliament state seat breakdown 031208国阵在1986年赢得有关的国会议席,唯却在1990年落入46精神党手中,较后再由国阵在1995夺回。然而,瓜登却在1999年掉入回教党的手中,最后才在最近的2004年及2008年的两届大选归属国阵,但多数票皆非太高。

因此,一旦回教党顺利胜出或成功削减多数票,那么民联的士气将会大增,同时也巩固安华的新政治路线。相反的,若国阵成功以漂亮的得票捍卫有关的议席,这也意味着纳吉已获得民意的背书,巫统也可宣称本身已步上复苏之路。

欲拉高战情至全国的层次

为此公正党希望能将战情拉高到全国层次,突现这场补选是“安华对纳吉”之战,并借助全国课题如经济放缓、贪污、石油税收等争议来赢取选票。

他们期望回教党能够委派一名全国领袖亲自上阵,属意的人选就是上届大选瓜登候选人兼全国副主席莫哈末沙布。

公正党策略主任兼马樟国会议员赛夫丁已率先在党报《公正之声》中开腔,认为基于补选时间短促,应委派全国领袖披甲上阵,间接为沙布造势。

牵动回教党派系倾轧交替

回教党方面,这场补选结果势必也会牵动党内“亲安华”和“亲巫统”派系的角力。据悉,由于登州选民排斥“外来天兵”,隶属“亲安华”派系亦是瓜登属下的峇都布洛州议员的赛阿兹曼目前是最热门的人选。他也获得瓜登属下3个州议席的回教党基层力挺上阵。

syed azman syed ahmad nawawi一旦赛阿兹曼(左图)顺利获得委派上阵及胜出,那么遭保守派抨击的“亲安华”派系的声势将会上涨,主导回教党的路线及影响明年的党选,并一举化解回教党对民联立场暧昧不明的立场。同时也将牵动回教党党内的“世代交替”,特别是在党两个大本营——吉兰丹和登嘉楼。

吉兰丹的党精神领袖聂阿兹,以及登嘉楼州主席慕斯达法阿里年事已高,随时可交出领导棒子。其中,领导“亲安华”派系的全国副主席胡桑,料会是聂阿兹的接棒人。而被视为登州“亲安华”派领头羊的赛阿兹曼,若能在瓜登胜出,亦将成接管登州的热门人选。
(above picked from http://malaysiakini.com/news/95173)

[瓜登补选] 国阵-必胜之路 ? [一去不回头] !

28th December Malaysiaparty 's [NOW] News of Week
(picked from Malaysiakini.com) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/95310

12月28日 党讯精選
(转摘自《当今大马》 Malaysiakini ) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/95310

旺阿末法立宣誓续任上议员
一旦败选不能再重委必丢官

12月23日 中午12点30分
wan ahmad farid salleh interview 041007 talking虽然旺阿末法立已经受委代表国阵在瓜拉登嘉楼国席补选披甲上阵,但是他今早依然如期在国会上议院宣誓,续任上议员一职。

不过,旺阿末法立将担任上议员只是两个星期,因为他将在1月5日即瓜登补选提名日前夕辞职。

“只许胜不许败”之役


然而,如果旺阿末法立竞选失败的话,他将不能够重新受委为上议员。

换言之,这次瓜登补选对旺阿末法立来说“只许胜不许败”,因为一旦他败选的话,将一并失去其现任内政部副部长的官职。

上议员只可任2届6年


根据《马来西亚前锋报》报道,上议院议长阿都哈密表示,随着旺阿末法立今早宣誓就职,后者已经是第二届的上议员,就算只是担任短短的两个星期,但是也将被视为完成3年的任期。

阿都哈密指出,根据第三任首相敦胡先翁修改后的联邦宪法阐明,受委的上议员只能够担任该职最多两届或6年。

旺阿末法立的上议员任期原本是在本月22日届满,他宣誓就职只短短两周然后又辞职,曾引起一些疑问。

不过一般相信,这是因为虽然他一开始时被视为补选热门人选,但是到了后期呼声冷却下来时,因此他在12月14日被宣布续任上议员,唯最后一分钟却又峰回路转的脱颖而出成为候选人。
(above picked from http://malaysiakini.com/news/95310)

选票教训滥权的{搁置}计划 [私营化国家心脏中心IJN]

28th December Malaysiaparty 's [NOW] News of Week
(picked from Malaysiakini.com) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/95251

12月28日 党讯精選
(转摘自《当今大马》 Malaysiakini ) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/95251

为补选暂搁置心脏中心私营化
李文材促选民
以选票教训国阵

12月22日 下午3点53分
人民公正党全国副主席李文材医生对于内阁只是暂时搁置国家心脏中心私营化而非废除整个计划感到遗憾。

针对政府这个戏剧性的立场转变,他说,政府在周四宣布原则上同意出售心脏中心,但在周五内阁会议却搁置该计划,明显是为了即将来临的瓜登补选而作出的决定。

为什么说搁置而不是废除?

李文材也是务边国会议员,他今日发表文告表示,政府只是暂时搁置该计划,如果国阵在瓜登补选胜利,国家心脏中心很可能将被私营化。因此,他呼吁瓜登的选民在来临的补选,否决国阵。

为什么纳吉说搁置,不说废除或拒绝?为什么政府解释了心脏中心私营化后还是保持它的社会责任,现在却说搁置?显然这只是因为瓜登补选的来临而“暂时”搁置,只待补选过后才继续进行私营化。”

每年赚两千万能自我提升

李文材重申,公正党反对私营化国家心脏中心计划,因为私营化医疗服务不利于人民的利益。他续称,国家心脏中心每年赚取2千万令吉,已有足够能力提升其服务了。

八成病人公务员低收入者

“80巴仙的心脏中心病人是从中央医院转送进来的,他们大部分都是公务员或低收入公民。一旦心脏中心被私营化,他们都是最大的受害者。如森那美集团属下的梳邦医疗中心,病人须付双倍于国家心脏中心的医药费。”

李文材呼吁政府废除及停止任何形式的私营化计划。他说,以其继续探讨心脏中心的私营化,不如研究如何提升该服务以让更多病人从中受益。

“鉴于人民的力量和在野党的制衡,308大选后我们已多次成功的揭露或搁置数项滥权的计划,其中包括采购直升机、马来亚银行收购印尼银行、高数宽频等等。因此,瓜登选民要代全国人民以选票教训国阵政府。”
为什么说搁置而不是废除?
每年赚两千万能自我提升
八成病人公务员低收入者

(above picked from http://malaysiakini.com/news/95251)

FreeholdTitles NOT Awarded?! prelude of [That's Why We Shouldn't have different partisan in Federal & States Government] !

28th December Malaysiaparty 's [NOW] News of Week
(picked from themalaysianinsider.com) :
http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/index.php/malaysia/14702-putrajaya-blocks-perak-plan-to-award-land-titles

Putrajaya blocks Perak plan to award land titles
By Adib Zalkapli
PUTRAJAYA, Dec 23The federal government has put a damper on Perak's Pakatan Rakyat government's plan to award freehold titles to villagers in the state, by saying the move violates the National Land Code.

Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak said today that state governments could only issue freehold titles for land intended for federal and public use.

"However the Perak state government has voiced its intention to award freehold titles for planned and new villages in the state.

"As we are all aware, the National Land Council was formed according to the Federal Constitution for the purpose of coordinating the national land policy for uniformity. Therefore, the council decided that a special meeting be convened in the near future to discuss the matter," said Najib after chairing the National Land Council meeting here.

He added that the move by the Perak government is unconstitutional and has to be agreed to by the council.

"As far as the policy and the constitution are concerned, it cannot be done unilaterally. It has to go through the National Land Council, and the decision must be adopted by the council," said Najib.

When asked the Perak government's reasons for presenting the proposal, Najib said: "They have their reasons but whatever it is, it cannot go against the national land policy."

Early this month, Perak state executive councillor Ngeh Koo Ham reportedly said 149,000 people living in 349 planned and 134 new villages in the state could now apply for their freehold titles, adding that the titles would be issued within two weeks.

Ngeh also claimed that the move did not violate the National Land Code, saying that the state government had consulted a former Court of Appeal judge and a panel of experienced lawyers.

Soon after it won Perak in the March general election, the PR government had announced the plan to award land titles to new villagers, in what was a popular move seen as an attempt to reward voters there.

The federal government's move to block the plans will certainly result in more friction between PR state governments and Putrajaya.
(above picked from http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/index.php/malaysia/14702-putrajaya-blocks-perak-plan-to-award-land-titles)

Freehold Land Title NOT Awarded? 永久地契无望 ? ! Perak now then which Pakatan state ? 霹雳

28th December Malaysiaparty 's [NOW] News of Week
(picked from Malaysiakini.com) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/95340

Najib: Perak has no free hand in giving land titles
Dec 23, 08 4:43pm
The National Land Council will be holding a special meeting with the Perak government soon to discuss the latter's decision to award freehold land titles to residents.
*It cannot be done unilaterally
*MB: State has its reasons

Read more at
http://malaysiakini.com/news/95340

12月28日 党讯精選
(转摘自《当今大马》 Malaysiakini ) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/95363

纳吉言论波及槟州两土地政策
林冠英不许州政府权限遭剥夺

刘嘉铭 12月23日 傍晚7点46分
随著副首相声称霹政府无权自行发出永久地契给新村,槟州政府也即时重新检讨之前所宣布的两项州土地政策,并会在近日内另做宣布。

槟州首席部长林冠英强调,州政府会在土地决策权不被剥夺及未正面与联邦政府对抗的情况下,拟定惠及人民的一致性政策。

槟州政府在执政后曾宣布,住宅地可申请转为永久地契。而上周末则又宣布,让州内约2万户中低廉价屋的屋主,在不必缴付转换费下,可将地契转为永久地契。

奈何,副首相纳吉今日在主持国家土地理事会后表示,根据国家土地政策和联邦宪法,霹雳民联州政府无权自行发出永久地契给重组村和新村居民。

这意味霹州政府的建议将会被展延,直到国家土地理事会有所决定为止。这也将波及槟州相关的永久地契政策。

结果,同样出席该项会议的林冠英在会议结束后,即飞回槟城办事处召开记者会,做出回应。出席者包括第二副首长拉玛沙米。

近日内宣布两政策命运

林冠英表示,州政府将即时针对被波及的两项政策进行检讨,然后会在明天或明年宣布,是否将继续实行、取消或等至下一次的全国土地理事会会议才有定案。

“当然,这对我们之前的宣布影响甚大,因为至少2万个住家单位涉及其中。如果来得及,我明天会宣布,否则就等到明年。”

“我们了解,联邦政府不赞同霹政府的做法,但槟州政府会决定本身在土地管理方面的立场。我们会研究今早所讨论的事项,国家土地理事会也已一致决定,在未有任何定案前,在下一次会议中才另做最新的汇报。”

称宪法赋州政府土地权

他指出,霹雳和槟州正尝试归还土地给人民,但是理事会却认为,本身有权力制定国家土地政策。

“在《联邦宪法》第91条文下,任何政策的拟定都必须先和州政府商洽,所以,我们的看法是,州政府仍有权拟定一个州属的土地政策和方向。”

“那是属于州政府的权限,是否要获得联邦政府的同意根本就不成课题。无论如何,我们会严谨考量理事会的看法及拟定下一个步骤。”

尚未到达对薄公堂阶段

此外,他也表示,纳吉虽同意不容侵蚀及剥夺州政府的权限,但是,两人在执行层面上的看法却出现分歧。

“这很重要,因为涉及到法律层面,即州政府是否有一切权力,还是联邦说了算。如果是后者,州政府将沦为应声虫或空壳。”

“目前,属于州政府的只有两项主要权限和事务,即土地和地方事务,如果没有权力处理土地政策,这将严重削减、限制甚至剥夺了州政府的土地决策权。”

他不排除,此课题可能会升级成为法律上的疑难,而最终被逼交给法庭定夺,但是至今尚未达到对薄公堂的阶段。
近日内宣布两政策命运
称宪法赋州政府土地权
尚未到达对薄公堂阶段
(above picked from http://malaysiakini.com/news/95363)

State Government Power 州政府无权禁止入境砂拉越 ? ?

28th December Malaysiaparty 's [NOW] News of Week
(picked from Malaysiakini.com) : http://malaysiakini.com/letters/94192

MP denied entry into Sarawak
Muda Mohd Noor Dec 24, 08 7:09pm
A PKR parliamentarian today claimed that he has been denied entry into Sarawak by immigration officers at the Kuching International airport.
*Entry ban 'politically motivated'
*Returned to KL on 9.50pm flight

Read morea at http://malaysiakini.com/news/95432


12月28日 党讯精選

(转摘自《当今大马》 Malaysiakini ) : hhttp://malaysiakini.com/news/95438

疑因挺同僚质疑砂官联公司惹祸
公正党国会议员被禁入境砂拉越

12月25日 上午11点01分
gobalakrishnan hindraf batu caves siege 121207 lead公正党国会议员哥巴拉克里斯南(N Gobalakrishnan,右图)昨日抵达古晋机场时,突遭移民厅官员以“非砂拉越人为由”为由
阻拦入境,使得他不得不乘机折返吉隆坡。

这名巴东色海国会议员指出,他被禁止入境的理由荒谬,背后明显存有政治动机。

他是在昨天下午5点半抵达古晋机场时被拦阻,“当我踏足在机场时,移民厅官员便告诉我,联邦政府指示,我不能够入境。”

当时移民厅官员递给他一张通知,上面写着“您并非砂拉越人,在没有获得允许或持有《1959-1963年移民法》的通行证之下,您没权进入砂拉越”。

一度拒绝登机返回首都

哥巴拉在遭阻拦入境之后,原本准备搭乘傍晚7点25分返回吉隆坡的班机。

不过,他随后却改变主意,试图进行抗争,拒绝登机,并坚持留在机场。随后公正党砂拉越浮罗岸州议员黄锦河也抵达机场与移民厅官员进行协商。

黄锦河斡旋解禁也不果


pkr keadilan sarawak 170406 dominique ng黄锦河(左图)告诉移民厅官员,在联邦宪法底下,州政府无权禁止任何一名国会议员入境砂拉越。

不过,黄锦河的斡旋努力最终无效。哥巴拉克最终不得不搭乘9点50分起飞的亚航班级返回吉隆坡。

将入禀砂法庭挑战禁令

也是一名执业律师的黄锦河告诉《当今大马》,哥巴拉已决定入禀砂拉越法庭,挑战禁止他入境的命令。

哥巴拉声称,他这次前往砂拉越是为了出席一项公正党的活动。

下季国会召开时提出


哥巴拉认为,州政府禁止他入境的原因在于,在上周国会召开时,他曾经力挺一名民联议员同僚质疑砂拉越州官联公司所扮演的角色,并挺身站起来为其辩护。

哥巴拉也誓言将在下季国会召开期间,提出他遭禁止入境砂拉越的课题。

《当今大马》至今仍未能针对哥巴拉遭禁止入境砂拉越一事取得任何官方的回应。

安华亲自执掌东马两州


pkr congress ceramah 291108 anwar1公正党实权领袖安华(左图)在该党在11月底代表大会期间放话宣布,该党目前放眼极有可能在明年举行的砂拉越州选举,因为夺取砂拉越州政权是新的变天途径。

他当时表示,公正党目前已把砂拉越州列为前线州,而所有公正党的州务大臣和国州议员,每个礼拜都必须组团,至少到砂州进行一次的政治活动。

根据公正党最新出炉的
各州联委会主席排阵,安华将亲自出任沙巴及砂拉越,东马两州的联委会主席。公正党声称,这项任命标志着该党高度关注东马二州的贫困问题,并认真的把这两州视为前线州。

不过,根据《中国报》报道,砂州首席部长泰益玛目(Taib Mahmud)却已在12月11日否认在明年举行闪电州选举的可能性,并炮轰在野党妄想在来届州选击败国阵执政砂州,根本是患了政治妄想症。
(above picked from http://malaysiakini.com/news/95438)

Saturday, December 27, 2008

安华甚么什么未来首相人选, 更应该去看沟渠 ! ! !

27th December Malaysiaparty 's [SPot] Special Report
(picked from Malaysiakini.com) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/95387

12月27日 专题报导
(转摘自《当今大马》 Malaysiakini ) : hhttp://malaysiakini.com/news/95387

一句没必要凡事要安华回应惹祸
马华行动党罕见联手炮轰蔡添强
12月24日 下午1点22分

tian chua 03 240505公正党宣传主任蔡添强(左图)反驳行动党主席卡巴星,声称国会反对党领袖兼公正党实权领袖安华没有必要回应回教党副主席胡桑慕沙所发表的落实回教刑事法言论的一席话惹祸,罕见地招致马华及行动党的联手炮轰。

根据报道,蔡添强是在昨日驳斥卡巴星要求安华回应胡桑慕沙发表若民联执政中央政府必定落实回教刑事法的言论,并表示若卡巴星有所不满,可直接约见胡桑慕沙本人或回教党领袖,没有必要凡事都要安华亲自回应。

蔡添强也说,安华作为未来首相人选,不可能小至街道清洁问题、禁酒等课题都要回应。而他身为公正党的宣传主任,已经代表公正党与民联的立场,即维护联邦宪法的精神,而回教党要做出任何改变之前,必须获得民联认同。

他也指出,既然胡桑已经澄清,回教党不会再没有咨询友党的情况下,冒然实施回教法,再加上这仅是胡桑在辩论时所提出的个人观点,不代表回教党的立场,所以卡巴星不应该在这课题上争执不休。

潘俭伟遗憾对卡巴星不敬

tony pua民主行动党全国宣传秘书兼灵北区国会议员潘俭伟(昨图)则发表文告,对蔡添强指行动党全国主席卡巴星“没必要凡事要安华回应”的言论感到非常遗憾,并认为蔡添强的言论是对一个资深领袖的不敬。

karpal singh潘俭伟指出,卡巴星(右图)要求公正党实权领袖安华针对回教党副主席胡桑慕沙挑起“民联将实行回教刑事法”的言论做出回应并无任何不妥。因为安华除了是公正党的最高领袖外,他也是民联三党的核心人物之一,安华对回教刑事法的立场将深深影响人民对民联的看法。

潘俭伟也不认同蔡添强指“安华是未来的首相人选,就不可能小至街道清洁问题、禁酒课题都要他亲自回应”的言论。因为回教刑事法并不是地方民生问题,而是关系到国家的宪法精神和民联三党的结盟共识,由安华亲自回应此课题才能显得公正党是严正看待任何挑战我国宪法精神的言论。

潘俭伟也重申行动党坚决反对在我国实行回教刑事法,因为我国自建国以来就已经在宪法上阐明马来西亚是一个世俗民主国。他说,行动党对任何人尝试挑战宪法,要在我国落实回教刑事法都不会给予妥协。

安华立场是民联最终立场


chew mei fun另一方面,马华全国妇女组主席周美芬(右图)也力促安华必须针对胡桑的回教法言论表态,以向全体人民清楚说明该党及民联对回教法的立场和原则。

她说,胡桑在日前的一场辩论中,信誓旦旦的承诺该党将在执掌中央政权后,全面推行回教刑事法,已经引起非回教徒的疑虑。

“回教党执意要在马来西亚推行回教法,是一种完全漠视我国多元种族、多元宗教国情的狭隘态度,更是对我国联邦宪法的世俗精神的一种严重藐视。”

周美芬强调,安华作为在公正党中掌握最高权力的实权领袖,以及作为民联的最高领袖,如果不在回教党要推行回教法的课题上做出任何明确的交待或看法,是完全说不过去的。

“更何况,行动党秘书长林冠英以及主席卡巴星已经先后要求安华针对有关课题发言显示安华的立场才是民联的最终立场。

认同胡桑抑或边缘行动党?


除非林冠英和卡巴星在民联的地位可有可无,否则安华应该尊重两位同僚的意愿,立即对胡桑的言论表态。如果安华继续保持沉默,那就有两种可能:一、他默认胡桑的言论,即民联一旦执掌中央将推行回教法;二、行动党在所谓平起平坐的民联里被公正党及回教党边缘化,以致其秘书长和主席的要求都无法获得任何满足或回应。

她也认为蔡添强在回应卡巴星时表示“安华作为未来首相人选,不可能小至街道清洁问题、禁酒等课题都要回应”,是非常荒谬的说辞。

周美芬指出,推行回教法是一项事关国体、宪政、社会形态以及人民切身生活的重大课题,蔡添强将有关问题比喻为“街道清洁问题”,简直是太儿戏了。

“蔡氏即使要为安华推脱责任,也应该提出更具说服力的理由,而不是以如此轻蔑的态度去敷衍其民联同僚和广大人民。
(above picked from http://malaysiakini.com/news/95387)

Sunday, December 21, 2008

选举前耍戏之8 [私营化国家心脏中心IJN] 选后再来 ? !!!

21th December Malaysiaparty 's [SPot] Special Report
(picked from Malaysiakini.com) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/95172

12月21日 专题报导
(转摘自《当今大马》 Malaysiakini ) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/95172

心脏中心私营化有待详细研究
纳吉:搁置决定无关瓜登补选
李伟伦 | 12月19日 傍晚6点35分
najib parliament 141008副首相纳吉表示,内阁决定搁置国家心脏中心私营化的决定,与下个月举行的瓜拉登嘉楼补选无关。

他在受询及是否有这项考量时,简短答说:“不,完全无关”。

纳吉也是财政部长,他今午在部门召开记者会,宣布内阁议决暂搁私营化国家心脏中心的计划。

需时数个月深入研究建议


该项决定已由马华总会长兼交通部长翁诗杰于2个小时前,作出宣布。不过,翁诗杰的记者会却只邀请中文媒体

纳吉表示,政府作出这项决定,是要优先关注人民的需要,确保国家心脏中心继续履行其社会责任。

他也说,政府将通过数个部门,即财政部、卫生部和首相署经济策划单位,深入研究有关建议,定夺是否要把国家心脏中心私营化

研究可能需时数个月,但时间不是最大的考量。最重要的是,最后的决定真的重视人民,而且能把该中心打造成世界闻名的心脏中心。

就算私营化政府将续捐款


不过,纳吉也为未来私营化的建议留下伏笔

“我必须澄清,一旦心脏中心交给森那美接掌,意味着政府将继续其捐款。”

“这代表着,国家心脏中心的社会责任,将由政府所承担。政府不会忽略或牺牲社会责任。”

调低中行利率不止一考量


另一方面,一名记者询及,由于近来通膨率高涨,中央银行会否考虑再次调低利率。

不过,纳吉却拒绝置评,只表示本身的政策向来是,交由中央银行决定其利率水平。

他强调,降低利率与否,不仅只有通膨率一项考量,诸如经济成长前景及资本流出等,都是需要考虑的因素。
(above picked from http://malaysiakini.com/news/95172)

Suggestion for a better Malaysia

21st December Malaysiaparty 's [NOW] News of Week
(picked from letter section at Malaysiakini.com) : http://malaysiakini.com/letters/94781

Things not looking all that bright for 2020
Arunasalam P Dec 12, 08 4:27pm

In a short period of twelve years from now, the world would witness the birth of 2020. This popular year is earmarked to project Malaysia as a developed nation. From schools to universities and homes to workplaces, Malaysians have been encouraged to work towards achieving a developed nation status which is spearheaded by the national vision called Vision 2020.

While former prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad launched this campaign in the 1980s, I have always asked this simple question over the past two decades - What would Malaysia be like in the year 2020? In a short period of twelve remaining years, what would our beloved nation be like?

Will it be a shining model and example of a newly-developed and industrialised nation?


Would people live in a better economic, social and political environment?

Would we identify ourselves as Malaysian rather as Malays, Chinese, Indians, Kadazans etc?

Would Malaysia be racially integrated rather remaining polarised as we have witnessed over the past 50 years?


Would the income gap between the rich and poor narrow or widen?

Would there be greater freedom of speech, worship, association and assembly which are fundamentally important for a developed country?


Would the state provide better social and welfare protection for those in need irrespective of race, religion, colour and creed?
The list of questions can grow longer and longer given the current situation and future projection.

In order to answer some of these pressing questions, we need to examine the present and past situation in Malaysia and project the future. I can safely predict that we would remain as racially and religiously divided and polarised as we are today. The income disparity between the rich and poor would grow wider.

There would be more infrastructure development but less emphasis on social development and that would mean that we would have first-class infrastructure and Third World wages. There would also be more restriction on some of the fundamental rights and freedom that are enshrined in our constitution.

In a nutshell, Malaysia may rank lower and poorer then some of our neighbors in terms of socio -economic development.

A simple computation on wages paid to ordinary factory workers now would indicate what these workers would earn in 2020. A factory worker at present earns an average starting wage of RM600 per month and if he or she receives 6% compounding annual increase, would earn RM1138 in 2020.

Only a meagre sum that can’t even provide for basic needs even today. As most Malaysians are wage-earners, their income would not be sufficient to meet the cost of living in a ‘developed country’ if at all we achieve that status in 2020.

A graduate with a degree starts with RM1,500 – RM2,000 per month and by 2020 his or her salary would be about RM2,500 – RM3,500 per month. Our educated community would have to struggle to make ends meet. Even at present, we often hear of some taking on more than one job or ‘moonshining’ to make ends meet, what more in 2020.

As a result of such inadequacies, there would be social and political unrest. Due to this, would the government of the day (2020) suppress and oppress the people?

If those in power are concerned about the future of our beloved nation, they should quickly carry out serious social engineering and start improving the livelihood of the working and farming communities. Malaysian workers should earn decent real wages and not subsistence-based wages.

They should enjoy permanent and regular employment and not irregular or precarious (contract, temporary or casual) employment. Migrant workers should not be brought in to suppress increase in wages in the name of market and cost competition.

While concentrating on infrastructure development, the government should not neglect the social, economic and welfare development of the rakyat. This does not mean creating a system of dependency as is the present case. The government should empower the people fairly irrespective of race or religion so that they become a productive and enterprising force.

When I met Mahathir in 1987, I told him that a developed nation does not only mean one with infrastructure development but one also with social and intellectual development. It also means racial integration and not division.

I hope that I am wrong in my above prediction but what can I say given the prevailing situation in beautiful Malaysia. Let’s keep our fingers crossed and watch what unfolds in 2020.
(above picked from http://malaysiakini.com/letters/94781)

[反贪污委员会法案] 三读通过下议院

21th December Malaysiaparty 's [NOW] News of Week
(picked from Malaysiakini.com) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/94966

12月21日 党讯精選
(转摘自《当今大马》 Malaysiakini ) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/94966

国阵全力护航,民联修改不果
下议院通过反贪污委员会法案

王德齐 12月16日 傍晚6点33分 (晚间8点更新)


abdullah ahmad badawi bpr aca judiciary law 101208经过两天的仓促辩论之后,首相阿都拉矢志在退休前完成的大马反贪污委员会法案,今午在国阵议员的一致护航之下,终于通过二读和三读。

这也意味着反贪委员会法案已经顺利通过下议院所有的立法程序,接下来将提呈上上议院寻求通过。

虽然人民联盟议员在辩论阶段屡屡要求政府修改法案,包括赋予独立检控权摆脱行政权的影响,但是在国阵议员人数占优的情况下,这项法案最终还是在下午5点通过二读投票,并进入委员会辩论阶段。

随后,这项法案也顺利在晚上7时50分完成委员会辩论阶段,并通过三读,顺利在下议院闯关。

值得一提的是,正副首相阿都拉和纳吉下午也一度进入议会厅内,聆听纳兹里作出的总结。

阿都拉是于上周三向下议院,提呈拖延许久的两项改革法案——反贪委员会法案和司法委员会法案进行一读。

驳斥总检长权力过大之说

parliament gobind singh ban over nazri mistake 251108 04较早时,首相署部长纳兹里(左图)为反贪委员会法案进行总结时,也驳斥反对党指责总检察长权力过大的说法,称法案中的“总检察长”(Public Prosecutor)其实是指总检查署,而不应该狭隘的诠释为总检察长个人而已

“提控案件的决定权已经交给调到反贪委员会的副检察官。因此,议员们提出的问题不会发生。”

他也辩称,虽然总检察长拥有提控的最终决定权,但是他个人不可能亲自阅读每年提控的2万宗案件,“他阅读一年都读不完!”因此,最终是由其他总检查署官员会负责决定是否作出提控。

不过,民联议员如怡保东区国会议员林吉祥和瓜拉雪兰莪国会议员祖基菲,还是对纳兹里的解释感到不满。其中,林吉祥就形容这是“不合逻辑”。

建议设总检长委任委员会


对此,纳兹里回应说,国会议员不应该因为不满现任总检察长阿都干尼,而建议撤出总检察长的权力。

“如果问题是出在个人身上,那么问题应该是我们能针对有关人士采取什么行动,而不是撤除总检察长现有的权力。”


为了安抚仍然不满的民联议员,纳兹里也建议比照司法委员会,设立一个委员会来处理总检察长的委任。

“如果法官能够有一个司法委员会,来确保法官是自由的,我们何不也这么做来委任总检察长?最重要的获得最好的人选。”

拒绝让委员会向国会负责

针对民联议员呼吁让反贪委员会直接向国会负责的看法,纳兹里回应说,政府不曾打算这么做,因为政治人物可能趁机影响委员会的操作。

“我们不曾想过将反贪委员会设在国会管辖下!这是不可能,因为我们是奉行党派政治(partisan politics)。”

不过,他也补充说,朝野两方的国会议员还是可以通过,上下议员组成的贪污事务特别委员会,来扮演他们的角色。

他也承诺,虽然法律没有作出明文规定,但是这个特别委员会将会是由朝野上下议员组成。

设检讨小组研究拒绝原因

此外,纳兹里也表示,为了杜绝“选择性提控”的问题,反贪委员会也必须向一个检讨小组负责,以解释拒绝提控某些案件的原因。

不过,他指出,这个小组是由行政机构设立的架构,而不是由法案授权成立。他也表示,目前尚无法提供进一步详情,包括小组成员。

针对一些国会议员呼吁政府给予反贪委员会官员更好的薪金和福利制度,纳兹里则表示,政府会确保他们获得比其他执法机构更好的待遇。

建议直接赋予独立检控权


此外,两名民联国会议员较后也在委员会阶段提出修改动议,确保反贪委员会能够享有独立的检控权,以及直接向国会负责。

lim kit siang parliament pc 201008 02行动党怡保东区国会议员林吉祥(左图)和公正党梳邦国会议员西华拉沙,是援引议会常规第57(2)条文,动议对个别条文进行修改。

为了赋予独立检控权,林吉祥建议修改第5(6)条文,让反贪委员会总监直接拥有刑事程序法典,赋予副检察官的权力。

至于授权总检察长拥有提控的最终决定权的第58条文,他则建议改成直接允许总监有权作出提控。西华也提出类似的建议,他认为这项条文应该直接被删除。

要求规定报告须呈上国会

针对反贪委员会所设的3个监督委员会,林吉祥也建议设立“贪污事务国会委员会”来取代“贪污事务特别委员会”。

两者最大的不同则是,前者是以国会反对党领袖为首,并由下议院根据朝野比例委任7名委员;而后者却是由国会下议院首长(即首相)委任7名上下议员成为委员。

他也建议,“贪污事务国会委员会”必须在每年首季会议,提呈报告汇报常年的运作”。

pakatan cij parliament pc 131108 sivarasa西华(左图)则建议特别委员会应该反映朝野比例,并规定反贪委员会提呈的年度报告,必须呈上国会进行辩论,和列下所有由委员会处理的案件,以及他们所采取的行动。此外,他也建议,投诉委员会的报告也必须呈上国会。

建议需解释不明来历财产


此外,林吉祥也建议增设第16A条文,规定现任或前任公职人员,如果不向法庭解释不明来历的财产,那么将构成违法。

西华也建议修改7项条文,扩展委员会的调查权力,能够在无需总检察长的批准下,直接展开搜查行动、调查银行户口、查封不动产、截查电话或邮件、扣押旅游证件等等。

不过,由于国阵议员人数占优,民联议员所提出的修改动议都被否决。

巫统署理候选人被指贿选


另一方面,公正党马樟区国会议员赛夫丁在纳兹里总结时也趁机作出指控,称一名巫统署理主席候选人公然在党选中贿选,向党员承诺在中选后愿意付给每周500令吉零用钱,并且提供免费机票和酒店住宿。但是,他并没有点名有关候选人的身份。

他甚至声称,自己已经掌握有关候选人的两位竞选代理,分别是一名前霹雳州行政议员和一名前吉打州巫青团执委,以及行贿的事件和地点。他也透露,这是一名巫统党员向揭露的事实。

不过,纳兹里并没有正面回应赛夫丁的指控,仅解释贪污案件是不会受到期限的限制,即使是10年前的案件问题,反贪委员会也有权处理。

(above picked from http://malaysiakini.com/news/94966)

土崩报告内阁讨论后,才对外宣布报告结果 ! ? ?

21th December Malaysiaparty 's [SPort] Special Report
(picked from Malaysiakini.com) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/95105

Landslide: PWD refuses to send report to MB
Jimadie Shah Othman | Dec 18, 08 6:32pm

The Public Works Department (JKR) has refused to hand over its Bukit Antarabangsa landslide report to the Selangor government to the chagrin of Menteri Besar Abdul Khalid Ibrahim.
Decision conveyed this afternoon
Reason given: Too many implications
Read more at http://malaysiakini.com/news/95105


12月21日 专题报导
(转摘自《当今大马》 Malaysiakini ) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/95103

淡江土崩报告须部长先过目
工程局突然拒绝呈给雪政府
12月18日 傍晚5点59分

尽管雪州大臣卡立依布拉欣早前宣布,公共工程局将于明日把国际山庄土崩调查报告提呈给雪州政府,但是事情目前却急转直下,出现变化。

《当今大马》探悉,工程局已经拒绝把两周前发生的土崩报告提交给雪州政府。相反地,公共工程部长莫哈末再因则将在明天的内阁会议上,率先提呈有关报告进行讨论后,才对外宣布报告结果

据悉,工程局已在今午把这个决定告知雪州政府,导致卡立可能无法按照原订计划,在明天向土崩灾民公布报告书的内容。

指交报告将造成许多“后果

不过,工程局并未说明拒绝交出报告给州政府的理由,仅推搪说一旦报告的副本提交给卡立,将造成许多“后果”。据悉卡立对于工程局拒绝呈交调查报告一事,感到非常不满。

让居民知晓是否能搬回居住

卡立在12月10日的雪州行政会议过后表示,在工程局技术小组呈上调查报告之后,有关当局将会在9天内答复国际山庄居民的疑问,让他们知晓该地区是否被列为高风险的地区,以及是否可以搬回原有的家园居住。

卡立于本星期天与国际山庄居民及工程局对话时也同样透露,工程局本已答应把调查报告交给雪州政府。而州政府将根据这项地质探测报告,宣布是否批准5个重灾区的居民是否能够重新返回家园居住。这5个重灾区包括武吉再也花园、武吉美华花园、Impian Selatan公寓、旺沙第9及第11路。

排斥州政府最终令灾黎吃亏


雪州大臣办公室在今日傍晚发表文告,对于工程局拒绝把报告交给州政府表示遗憾,并表示此举令人感到混淆,让州政府难以迅速决定土崩灾黎的命运。

文告说,卡立是在星期天分别与两批居民代表举行对话,当时工程局答应将把地质技术报告和大马公共工程研究院调查报告提呈给州政府,以便让州务大臣能够宣布5个住宅区的安全状况,以及州政府应该采取的下一步行动。

文告表示,众所周知土地管理事务属于州政府的权限,应该当局在此事上排斥州政府,无疑将让土崩灾民吃亏。

“希望政府机构能够在处理这宗惨剧时更加专业。”

“无论如何,州务大臣将在接到报告后,宣布必须采取的措施,并准备尽一切必要的方法及继续监督土崩地区的情况。同时,保证州政府及所有相关机构将继续捍卫土崩灾黎的命运。”

不满报告必须先由部长过目


另一方面,掌管雪州旅游、消费人及环境事务的行政议员黄洁冰也发表文告表示,州政府原本希望在今天获得工程局报告后,在明天早上10点会见居民,以便告诉居民是否可以安全的重返家园。

她指出,州政府受到通知,有关报告必须先交由工程部长过目,唯有在部长宣布之后才可以允许州政府阅读报告。

“另外一个令人困扰的理由就是,有关报告是由中央政府所资助,因此必须先由他们过目,接着才轮到我们。”

她炮轰当局这种做法,并表示部长与州政府同样有权获得工程部报告的内容。

“我们与居民一样焦急,想要知道国际山庄的安全性,因为这将影响数以千计的居民及当地未来的发展。”

“与其在谁应该先过目的事件上争辩不休,倒不如把有关报告一起交给联邦部长与州政府。”

(above picked from http://malaysiakini.com/news/95103)

pre-Election Show.7 [ IJN Privatization ] High Costs Burden !!!

21th December Malaysiaparty 's [SPot] Special Report
(picked from themalaysianinsider.com) :
http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/index.php/malaysia/14559-govt-will-not-privatise-or-sell-ijn-says-abdul-latiff


Govt will not privatise or sell IJN, says Abdul Latiff

KUALA TERENGGANU, Dec 20The government today assured the people that it will not sell nor privatise the National Heart Institute (IJN) so long as there is no alternative which provide similar service to the people, Deputy Health Minister Datuk Dr Abdul Latiff Ahmad said.

malaysiakini to post this ==>
He said that while the idea to privatise the IJN was good because the government would no longer be burdened by the high costs of subsidising treatments at the institute, now was not the best time to do so.

“It is a good idea but what about those in the low-income group? Can they be assured of obtaining similar service?

“These are the things that the government needs to consider,” he told reporters after a dialogue with Terengganu Health Department staff here.

He also said that the people should not be worried as until an alternative service was available, the government would not entertain any proposal to privatise or sell IJN.
(above picked from http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/index.php/malaysia/14559-govt-will-not-privatise-or-sell-ijn-says-abdul-latiff)

pre-Election Show.6 [ IJN Privatization ] Democracy Showblasted - to show that they are so so and getting democracy now !

21th December Malaysiaparty 's [SPot] Special Report
(picked from themalaysianinsider.com) :
http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/index.php/malaysia/14507-when-yes-men-say-no

When yes men say no!

COMMENTARY

DEC 19 - Maybe it's democracy finally at work but the Cabinet's swift if not subtle rejection of Sime Darby Berhad's bid for IJN is a salutary lesson that top-down leadership is no longer vogue in Malaysia.

There was a time when a nod from the prime minister, his deputy and senior ministers would virtually assure any deal or proposal to go through as civil servants and political wannabes scramble to sycophantically serve their political masters. Case in point would be the Proton national car project, Petronas Twin Towers, Putrajaya administrative capital and the Bakun Dam project, among others.

All done despite objections and criticisms.
malaysiakini to post this ==>
But such decisions are harder to push through by the day with the proposed IJN buy-out the latest in line of deals undone due to a combination of internal opposition and public outcry despite Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Badawi, his deputy Datuk Seri Najib Razak and the Economic Planning Unit endorsing the proposal.

Yet, it floundered at the Cabinet meeting today - a sign of times that those in power are not as sure footed as before. And maybe some people in various levels of the administration have found their voice and courage to object and say no.

Of course, another reason for the Sime Darby proposal meeting stiff opposition is Malaysia's mixed experience with privatisation.

The smorgasbord of public utilities and services privatised over the past two decades have seen some hits and misses that have made the people leery of putting more public institutions in private hands.

Among them are Tenaga Nasional Berhad, which now buys power at fixed prices from independent power producers, or Telekom Malaysia Berhad which still depends on the government for public projects, or Malaysia Airlines which is now a virtual airline with assets owned by another government-linked company, and the endless ribbons of privatised highways that require government compensation to keep toll charges low.

Former prime minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, who always supported and today admitted that privatisation started during his time, has joined the bandwagon against putting IJN in private hands.

"I seldom oppose privatisation but this is one instant (sic) when I feel privatisation is the wrong thing to do," Mahathir wrote in his popular www.chedet.com weblog today.

Mahathir, who underwent a heart operation in 1989 that led to the establishment of IJN, admitted his personal attachment to the medical facility has led him to oppose the Sime Darby proposal as "the IJN is really the institution that is physically closest to my heart".

"Maybe I am biased because I owe my life to IJN. But I think as a corporatised institution the IJN has done extremely well," he said, adding it should be left alone as it is.

"The Barisan Nasional government is not too popular today. Why do something that may give the opposition another issue to belabour the government."

A trenchant critic's prophetic words which the Cabinet probably considered when deciding to politely decline Sime Darby's proposal despite the big guns backing it.

And an indication that might may no longer be right with enough people saying so.
(above picked from http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/index.php/malaysia/14507-when-yes-men-say-no)

~ Happy Reunion Day ~

Malaysia party and {JP}-[the 3rd PARTY] wishing all Malaysian and Chinese worldwide ~

*
HAPPY REUNION DAY*

*
*冬至团圆**

Malaysiakini to post this ==>

pre-Election Show.5 [ IJN Privatization ] MIC only weak up After Show ~ Malaysiakini

21th December Malaysiaparty 's [SPot] Special Report
(picked from themalaysianinsider.com) :
http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/index.php/malaysia/14556-dont-pass-social-responsibility-to-private-sector-says-palanivel

Don’t pass social responsibility to private sector, says Palanivel

KUALA LUMPUR, Dec 20Since medical care for serious diseases are not affordable even for the middle income group, the government should not hand over the National Heart Institute (IJN) to the private sector, said MIC Deputy President Datuk G. Palanivel.

malaysiakini to post this ==>
“Health care is a service and must be more than a business. We should continue to implement justice in health care,” said the former Deputy Women, Family and Community Development Minister in a statement here today.

Palanivel, in welcoming Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak’s move to defer the matter said the government should look at its principle of governance carefully and should not hand over its social responsibility to the private sector.

“I had been handling welfare work related to poor in the same ministry for more than eight years and was well aware of their plight and the difficulties they faced in obtaining financial assistance when they are diagnosed with serious diseases,” he said.

He said from April 2004 to January 2008, the ministry’s service centre had handled many problems and had obtained exemption for 133 cases totalling a sum of RM2,164,713.30.

“We referred the cases to the IJN Medical Welfare Officers who will perform the assessment and give exemptions on the spot. IJN officers sat as volunteers at my service centre. I am not certain whether the same level of cooperation would prevail if IJN was privatised,” he added.

Palanivel said the government should have the political will and social understanding and provide cost effective health care to the necessary cross-section of the Malaysian society.

“This can be done if the government studies the core strengths of the present health care systems and industry, both in the public and private sectors,” said Palanivel.
(above picked from http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/index.php/malaysia/14556-dont-pass-social-responsibility-to-private-sector-says-palanivel)

[Dr Chua] Malaysia Finanacial overview, and Advice to UMNO

21st December Malaysiaparty 's [NOW] News of Week
(picked from Dr.Chua Soi Lek blog) :
http://drchua9.blogspot.com/2008/12/blog-post_16.html

Installation Dinner of MCA Segambut Division in Tropicana
Posted by Datuk Seri Dr. Chua Soi Lek (Tuesday, December 16, 2008) at 5:45pm

I’ve attended the Segambut MCA Installation dinner 2 nights ago. I said that 2009 could be a very tough year for Malaysia, especially on the aspect of economy and politics.
malaysiakini to post this ==>
On the economy front, the U.S. financial crisis has become a global problem, affecting a lot of countries including Malaysia.

Malaysia is very dependent on trade, export of manufacture goods and primary commodities. Hence, all sectors will be affected. Bank Negara is optimistic that we can achieve 5% growth in Malaysia, which is quite commendable in view of many countries go into recession.

Next year, we predicted to achieve 3% growth. Going into 2010, it will be anybody’s guess.

It is obvious that we are unable to achieve an economic growth of 6% per year under the 9th Malaysia Plan. As rightly pointed out by Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohammed, this will definitely affect the 2020 vision.


Oil contributes about 40% of the country’s revenue. The 2009 budget is based on USD120 per barrel. Today, oil is trading at less than USD50 per barrel. Hence, our national revenue will be badly affected in 2009. However, the 2010 country’s revenue may be even worse than 2009 if the country’s primary commodity and oil remain depressed.

The economy slowdown will definitely cause reduction of new jobs (there are about 200, 000 new jobs every year). There will be increase in retrenchment and unemployment rate will go up next year.

The MCA Government Policy Monitoring Bureau has said 3 weeks ago that government should come out with mechanism to monitor any retrenchment exercise. This is a good opportunity to reduce our dependency on foreign workers.

The training scheme announced by the government should be publicized ...

How the government handles the downturn can make or breaks the government. This will be the Achilles heel to test the BN leadership, especially the Deputy Prime Minister.


People want the government to:

1) Reduce the burden and suffering of rakyat, especially the poor in view of inflation;

2) Reduce the cost of doing business

3) Help all sectors affected by economic downturn

4) Continue to strengthen the competitiveness of Malaysia economy, which is a very open system.


Malaysia is too dependent on trade and investment. Hence, it is important to continue to liberalize investment climate and ensure a friendly economy business environment. Hence, there is the need to reduce bureaucracy. This is very important in order to continue to enjoy economic growth despite the slowdown.

I talked about UMNO wakil rakyat, both Parliament and State Assemblyman who hardly visit Chinese area after the election and did not give peruntukan to them. As a result, this leads to disillusion.

Hence, they find that there is no difference, at least at the local level to vote for PAS. When Chinese vote for PAS, it is not an endorsement of PAS agenda but rather a protest vote.

Therefore, it is important that UMNO leaders at all levels must engage with non-Malays. This makes sense since the President and Deputy President become Prime Minister and Deputy Prime Minister and not just leaders for Malays and UMNO.

In the same way, MCA should not talk all about Chinese problems. It should have a more multiracial approach towards problem solving. We can be a Chinese based party but with a more multiracial outlook. Ideally, Malaysia politicians should be issue centric and not ethno-centric.
(part of the above picked from http://drchua9.blogspot.com/2008/12/blog-post_16.html)