Should Anwar Take this motion to crown himself Chief Minister ?

19th April Malaysiaparty 's pick of to-day
(picked from Dr Mohd Khir Toyo's blog)
at http://www.drkhir.com/2009/04/apa-kata-anwar-bertanding-di-dun.html

Apa Kata Anwar Bertanding di DUN Penanti?

1. Dalam pada kita menanti bilakah Anwar akan mengumumkan kabinet bayangannya yang gagal direalisasikan pada 16 September tahun lalu, satu lagi pilihan raya kecil akan diadakan.

2. Kali ini di DUN Penanti. Bukan wakil rakyat meninggal dunia. Bukan wakil rakyat di penjara. Bukan juga mahkamah mengisytiharkan pilihan raya kawasan tersebut tidak sah. Kita terpaksa berpilihan raya kecil lagi kerana ada parti yang sibuk berpolitik sepanjang tahun.

3. Seingat saya tidak pernah berlaku begitu banyak pilihan raya kecil dalam tempoh setahun selepas pilihan raya kecuali selepas pilihan raya umum ke 12 yang lalu. Pilihan raya kecil yang terlalu banyak ini merupakan gangguan kepada kerja-kerja pentadbiran, pemulihan ekonomi dan pembangunan yang perlu dilakukan oleh kerajaan.

4. Jika dahulu mungkin Barisan Nasional sahaja yang berhadapan dengan dilema ini. Sekarang parti seperti Pas, PKR dan DAP juga akan berhadapan dengan dilema yang sama kecualilah mereka tidak mengambil kisah soal-soal kemajuan negeri.

5. Apakah persamaan di Permatang Pauh, Bukit Selambau dan Penanti? Hanya kerana Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim mahu mencatur politik dalaman parti beliau, kita semua terpaksa berhadapan dengan satu lagi pilihan raya kecil. Masa dan tenaga yang boleh dicurahkan untuk kerja-kerja lain terpaksa ditumpukan kepada pilihan raya kecil ini.

6. Kemungkinan besar majoriti pengundi di DUN Penanti akan terus mengundi PKR kali ini kerana ketaksuban dan sentimen mereka kepada Anwar Ibrahim yang telah banyak menabur jasa di Permatang Pauh atas tiket Barisan Nasional suatu ketika dahulu. Saya juga yakin Anwar akan menguar-uarkan bahawa jika calonnya menang di Penanti nanti, maka orang itu akan dimahkotakan sebagai Timbalan Ketua Menteri baru menggantikan tempat Fairus.

7. Sekadar lontaran idea, oleh kerana Anwar sekarang sudah gagal menjadi Perdana Menteri dalam masa terdekat ini, apa kata beliau sendiri bertanding di DUN Penanti dan kemudiannya menjadi Ketua Menteri baru Pulau Pinang.

8. Mungkin ketika itu kita dapat mengukur kemampuan sebenar Anwar untuk mentadbir negara. Apa salahnya Guan Eng memberi laluan kepada pencetus kekuatan Pakatan Rakyat ini memimpin Pulau Pinang?

Posted by Dr Mohamad Khir Toyo at Friday, April 17, 2009 at his own blog.

One of the Many Reasons Why Pakatan Falls in Perak.

10th February Malaysiaparty 's pick of to-day
(picked from JP-[the 3rd PARTY] )

the Reason Why a gLaSs Castle Falls ! - KARMA SHOWS.II
Posted by { JP } on the Sunday, February 8, 2009at 7:55AM
for Malaysiakini editor: go direct to the bottom part (a message for you)
Time to Pay Your Bills
It's always a reason when things happened in such a way…

As the recent drama in Perak, the PAS’ MB is facing his toughest moment now. We've seen that his mouth still “showing off” smile and bringing jokes to his loving Perakian, but we heartful believe that his heart is squeezed. He was trying to calm down his supporters by bringing relaxing moment to alls when interviewed by reporters in his time-ending MB's office as we've seen on TV news.

This is the sad moment too considered if you are living in Perak! A “look-like” decent-man MB being “forced” to step down;

But the saddest portion should go to PKR.
PAS is a party wellknown with their clean governance, as Kelantan as ruled by Tok Guru; They lost a state, soon they will rebounded back to another climax, like Terengganu state - win-lost-win-and lost again, all determined by the Rakyat eager for developments in their area;

Whilst at the other end, PKR is more or least like a UMNO-II; never mentioned about their leader, Anwar was purely tutored from UMNO; and never mentioned about his keymen who jumped out from UMNO too and now topsitting at Selangor state. It's seems that most of the PKR ADUN who been appointed as states’ EXCO members were those “riches”, “business-minded” or “well-backing” persons.

In UMNO, we've heard that million dollars can buy you a district/area's chairman seat in their own party election; In PKR, we've might curious to find (out the evidence) that million dollars might won (or backed) you for a EXCO 's post in state.

Money is a sin; and money is the roll of everything. In political party, you need money. That’s why we've seen that they were collecting election fund when we ourselves felt the heat to give (but NOT donate -cause giving and donating are two different things) to give out our money pence (even it's the last one or two) into their fund box while the running of their arousing speech-shows. We are hoping for a [better Malaysia] (the most pop sentence nationwide) – that we are [hoping]. And this called the returns/gains that we're looking for. But if we are donating something, we don't look for returns.

Most of the people are not too generous; I'm not a generous person too as I'm also looking for the returns, a [better Malaysia].
Don't tell me that we are going forward to achieve what we are looking for, as “you can see we have manage to ruin the BN federal government by grabbing 1/3 of Dewan Rakyat 's seats which this should make them hard and harder to amend or impose any unbeneficial people but beneficial crony laws->…rules->…projects”; “you can see we have ruled in 5 states (but soon left 4..3..2..1..), and these states people are enjoying a clean and fair deal government now”; “so and soooon we are heading toward to our goal, the federal government”
This is our worry now! The federal government if it's really falls to their hands, how this country look like today ? We are worry now but we are looking forward to it then ! ?

Look at Selangor state, the PKR 's ADUN fired on DAP 's ADUN for the Bus-Channel issue;
the still unsettled (but now kicked the ball to court) in-waiting court’s judgment:Rawang Cable case;
the said said and talk talk water buying project; etc and etc..
Look at Penang, the PKR’s Deputy Chief Minister “boycotted/sidelined” by his own teammates;
Look at the recent hot state, the election for the village head/village chief or“Chun Chang”(in Mandarin) looks similarity objectively to put in their own party’s members (sponsoring type member, I think), which this election had been strongly disagreed by DAP;
Ride to the recent hot topic with his two under-charged for corruption law-suit ADUN s, then kidnapped (as prescribed by them), and then had “forced” to resign from their state assembly seat and now became independent (free of any party, at least at this moment) ADUNs;
Etc..and etc … chaos !

But all these are the only things floated up to surface, unveiled ones? Still a lots, I think. Most of the times when reported criminal showed you only 5 cases, it's means actually more than 5 !! Most of the people not reporting, hiding the truth, hiding for reasons …

Back to the point, after people given you money, off course they are looking for returns. NO doubt! They were not donating; they gave BIG sums to you!
And these big sums mainly came from unrevealed sources! United, for instant or others, country or could be syndicates in our own country which these bankers (as some called them supporters) are looking for their returns then, and now!!

So in the last few months (even the sparks clicking on at that moment in Selangor), he started to talk about Sarawak in order to “tuning” alls eye sides to the other side. Without giving any progressive action, the fire aroused then with one of the PKR 's state ADUN threatened to jump ship!
He created another fresh hope for his supporters (which included and mainly his bankers) by dreaming to write his first page at Sarawak!

“Time to pay your bill” (Luckily your name are not Bill Clinton) but the bill collectors at your doorsteps knocking hard and harder!
“Cake Not Shared in Fairness” (Even it's small but at least lets your partners to share a piece, but you got no more piece to share amongst your own partners cause it's already been distributed to your “fragile” partners -the other party in the joint Pakatan’s coalition)
Phones ringing, emails jerking in, faxes rolled out of paper, voice-transmitting through right-hand-men keep on annoying him like drilling hole at floor !

These alls made him scratching head and lost his wise judgments. And when a person is not able to make his good analytical judgment then bad decision made! Every politician must have a (born nature) preventive skill, I think. At the time he can't focus well, his enemy strike on him! And while everybody still thought that he is capable enough to hold on the "castle", as everybody (included his joining partners) ALREADY used to listen to him, used to follow his instructions til nobody or any other leaders’advices gone “ear-wind”; this time he falls !

Not just he himself got bullied and damned but his party and his coalition – the Pakatan falls down !

PAS had ride on the wrong ship
PAS has nothing wrong with this, the only fault step might be they had just “miss-out” and threw aside good advices at that crucial time.

DAP might just step onto a ghost ship
DAP shall by their own now, looks for another prospectus joining or by all means, row the boat by their own to the dock!
----------------------------------------------------------
After I've written this, I decided to post this article in the method to be listed up at Malaysiakini - [MKINI in BLOG] section for the purpose to test up the integrity of well-said A "Rakyat" 's news sources but not another ATS-Anwar Topple syndicate 's tool !

Selangor MP to Defect Soon ! ?

06th February Malaysiaparty 's pick of to-day
(picked from JP-[the 3rd PARTY] )

not Kedah, but Selangor to Defect soon ! ?
Posted by { JP } on the Friday, February 6, 2009 at 3:03PM

With the Malaysiakini reported that [Kedah's turn to feel defection heat] on yesterday news after the "EXPECTED" Perak 's defection, I have a different point of view.

To make this short, based on my own analysis, the most higest ranked state in defect soon is Selangor, instead of Kedah. :- 1. Reliable source told that the initial formation of Selangor state was the PAS tied up with UMNO instead of PKR-PAS-DAP coalition;

2. The initial and (to be fair) Perak 's MB supposed to be DAP 's ; but no qualified Bumiputra in that party, eventually "force" to hand over to Bumiputra 's lead party;

3. So, come to deal - PAS leader / committee agreed and instructed their Selangor 's state delegates NOT to jump ship but to joint the Pakatan 's coalition in forming Selangor DUN;

4. So, (if) the Selangor state DUN was build fracturality based on this undisclosed deal; and now the Perak 's Pakatan DUN collapsed (or soon to be) , and the dealt void ! So those "tend-to" jump ship PAS 's MP at least for now, "souled OUT" !!

5. Worst still with the PKR 's MP, where most of the time with their total distract immoral attittude which ala UMNO 's (cetak rompak of UMNO), we will see the defection in Selangor soon to come !!

6. I am strongly disagreed with these "grasshopper" / "katak" / "frog" or wat ever fuckanabe they called them, although (in few of yours perception), I'm anti-Anwarism, anti-PKR;

7. No more free water ? ... one of my concern

8. And I feel deeply sorry to the Perak 's MB, "he is look like a decent man"; "he is half- mixed with Chinese blood" ,...

Anwar, WHATa misLEADING Statement ?

12th January Malaysiaparty 's [NOW] News of Week
(picked from Malaysiakini.com) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/96051

Karpal: Anwar's statement on hudud misleading
Jan 8, 09 4:47pm
PKR leader Anwar Ibrahim’s statement that people should not worry about PAS’ intention to implement hudud laws as it would only be applicable to Muslims, was today called a fallacy by DAP stalwart Karpal Singh.
*Anwar should know PAS' intentions
*'Hudud laws unconstitutional'

Dark Force to Dump U Down, Selangor State Assembly Speaker & Assemblyperson Teng Chang Khim !

12th January Malaysiaparty 's [NOW] News of Week
(picked from Malaysiakini.com) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/96159

What fate awaits Teng?
Yong Kai Ping and Lee Way Loon Jan 9, 09 7:23pm
DAP’s contoversial assemblyperson, Teng Chang Kim is in hot water again, this time for a spat with two other Pakatan Rakyat MPs. Will he escape the wrath of the party or will he be punished?

The recent dispute over the North Klang Bus Terminal has put Selangor Assembly Speaker and Sungai Pinang State Assemblyperson Teng Chang Khim in a spot. DAP’s outspoken four-term assemblyperson is a popular figure, known for his fiery speeches and sarcastic columns in the Chinese press.
*CEC meeting on Monday
*Controversial article

---------------------------------------------------------
No doubt, there is a "black force" at the back to dump Teng. And let us just think in this way,
"Who will benefit if he's being replaced ? "
The answer is clear out here, P. keADILan. R ? So, they claimed "ADIL" (Fairness), what do you think ? Some more they mean for "Rakyat" (People) ; or for their ownselves ?

Pakatan is A Better Choice of all ? ?

12th January Malaysiaparty 's [NOW] News of Week
(picked from themalaysianinsider.com) : http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/index.php/opinion/john-lee/15557-pakatan-proving-to-be-a-viable-and-capable-alternative-

Pakatan proving to be a viable and capable alternative

JAN 9 — Pakatan Rakyat is now facing its first serious electoral test since its formation. How has it performed so far? While the ride has been bumpy, I believe that any fair yardstick must give Pakatan due credit for holding together and pursuing the agenda its supporters voted for. Pakatan Rakyat remains a viable political coalition, and offers a much stronger alternative to the electorate than its individual component parties did in the general election of March 2008.

The recent general election was actually a bit of an aberration in that for the first time in living memory there was actually a discernible core in all the manifestos of the different opposition parties. All three Pakatan parties have committed themselves to battling racism, reforming our government and improving access to economic opportunities. These were the three main planks of their platforms, and are what the voters of five states and Peninsular Malaysia at the federal level voted for.

Now, it is easy to think that Pakatan might be in danger of falling apart because of personal differences their politicians may have, or even policy differences. But I think we are really holding Pakatan to an unfair standard here. Barisan Nasional does not have a coherent platform to speak of, and its component parties bicker incessantly.

One thing Pakatan has going for it is that all its parties agree on the three problems they see facing the country, and more or less how to solve them. Barisan’s platform is predicated on denying the existence of these problems, and seems to have more of a vague theme running along the lines of “don’t bother switching, you have it so good”. Since before the March elections, and even more ever since then, Barisan parties have openly bickered on important policy issues. Umno says one thing about race, MCA says another; Umno says one thing about religion, MCA says another; Umno and MCA say one thing about the Internal Security Act, Gerakan and PPP say another. Barisan now has nothing to unite itself on except antipathy towards Pakatan, and a ragtag bunch of Pakatan-haters does not a coalition make.

The most pressing issue facing Pakatan at the moment is the struggle over hudud laws. Noted liberal Pas vice-president Husam Musa recently promised Pas supporters that it will continue to press for enactment of hudud laws at the federal level; the DAP has been equally adamant in reassuring its supporters that it will oppose hudud laws. The PKR position remains an enigma, but I imagine in its traditional spirit of compromise that when the issue comes to a vote, it will let its MPs vote freely. At first glance, this lack of Pakatan unity seems troubling.

But the true test of a political coalition is not singleminded ideological coherence; the true test is whether the component parties can give and take enough to govern effectively together. Husam explicitly stated that hudud laws would only be passed if other Pakatan parties consented; this is and always has been the Pas position, since even before the March general election. He did not say that Pas would quit the potential Pakatan government, or withhold support on other key issues if the theoretical hudud Bill failed. Pas is merely saying that it supports hudud laws; it is not saying that it will upset the wishes of the electorate at large by overturning the Pakatan agenda and quitting the coalition if it cannot get its way.

True reason for concern would be Pas talking of quitting Pakatan if the other parties refuse to accept the hudud laws. But this is not the case; Pas respects the right of other Pakatan component parties to differ, and has taken pains to assure everyone that it will not force the hand of its fellow Pakatan partners. To put this in perspective, Britain is governed by one party: Labour. Did Labour have a consensus about sending the young men and women of its armed forces to die in Iraq? Ministers quit the Labour government and numerous MPs voted against the party line in 2003 to voice their opposition. Yet did anyone muse about the possible collapse of the Labour government? No, because it was clear that in spite of their strong differences, the Labour government still had the support of its backbenchers. There is absolutely nothing wrong with individual component parties or even politicians taking different stands on important issues; that is the essence of democracy.

The real test of Pakatan’s staying power will be its viability to govern. Before March 2008, there was little way to tell how a Pakatan government would function — if it would function at all. ...
The occasional mishap under the Pakatan government in Selangor can hardly measure up to the scandals of the previous Barisan Nasional state government; the combined government in Perak has been working surprisingly effectively and efficiently even under a Pas menteri besar; Penang keeps moving forward with little friction, the occasional Umno-provoked demonstration aside. The three most developed states in the country have been governed with remarkably little muss or fuss by Pakatan; it is true that things in the states are far from perfect, but they show no signs of collapse, and they continue to develop and grow regardless of the party in power.

Every indication so far is that Pakatan remains a viable political grouping, with mature leaders willing to work together in spite of their differences to achieve their common ends. Before March 8, not many of us could seriously say we believed the Pakatan parties could hold together and govern; it is clear now that they are capable of doing as much, if not more. If the Malaysian people still hunger for the reforms, the change, the equality of opportunity we have been promised by our politicians from both Pakatan and Barisan, we have every reason now to seriously consider Pakatan a viable and capable alternative government.

安华言论谬论或 诈傻扮懵 ?

12th January Malaysiaparty 's [NOW] News of Week
(picked from Malaysiakini.com) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/96052

1月12日 党讯精選
(转摘自《当今大马》 Malaysiakini ) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/96052

指刑事法将影响非穆斯林
卡巴星驳安华言论不正确
1月8日 下午4点52分
回教刑事法课题在民联之间再掀争议，人民公正党实权领袖安华声称回教刑事法只是施加于穆斯林身上，招致民主行动党全国主席卡巴星的反驳，因为回教党所欲推行的回教法将对非穆斯林造成影响。

卡巴星表示，安华的言论与回教党成立回教国的意愿正好相反，因为回教党自创党以来就清楚表明成立回教国的立场，这可从该党前任与现任领导人反映出来。

只施加穆斯林身上是谬论

也是武吉牛汝莪国会议员的卡巴星，引述回教党精神领袖兼吉兰丹州务大臣聂阿兹在去年12月22日的谈话，反驳安华声称回教法只施加于穆斯林身上，是一种谬论。

根据报道，当时聂阿兹表示，他看不出为何国人无法接受回教法，例如涉及不正当性行为者被罚鞭打100下、偷窃者被判截肢及谋杀者被判死刑，因为目前我国法令对于犯下谋杀与贩毒者的刑罚，也是强制性缳首死刑。

聂阿兹也表示，无论行动党与公正党是否支持，回教党都不会放弃推行回教法，因为这是一项宗教义务。他指出，如果行动党反对回教法，回教党也无可奈何，“如果他们能够接受死刑，为何不能够接受回教法？”

沙地回教法影响非穆斯林

卡巴星也是著名的执业律师，他指出，推行回教法的先决条件就是成立一个回教国。

他以沙地阿拉伯为例，当地的回教法是施加于穆斯林与非穆斯林的身上。况且，在沙地阿拉伯犯法的外国人，也曾在回教法下被判鞭笞。

要求哈迪阿旺解释回教法

因此，卡巴星指出，安华有必要去了解，回教党所要成立的回教国的真正意图。

“回教党主席哈迪阿旺或许有必要澄清，一旦回教党成功成立一个回教国，该党要推行的回教法是否会施加于穆斯林与非穆斯林的身上？”

他强调，马来西亚并非一个回教国，因此推行回教法是违反联邦宪法的做法。

行动党议长倒了，谁得益 ？

12th January Malaysiaparty 's [NOW] News of Week
(picked from Malaysiakini.com) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/96165

1月12日 党讯精選
(转摘自《当今大马》 Malaysiakini ) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/96165

巴生车站争议与专栏文章惹祸
行动党下周一定夺邓章钦命运？
杨凯斌及李伟伦 | 1月9日 晚上8点05分

在过去2个月闹得沸沸扬扬的巴生车站课题，再次让向来言论出位的雪州议长兼双溪槟榔州议员邓章钦成为媒体焦点。不过，这名4届州议员或因此遭到党的对付，其政治生涯将面对冲击。

巴生车站课题本来只是单纯的地方议题，但由于邓章钦、行动党巴生国会议员查尔斯圣地亚哥，及公正党加埔国会议员马尼卡瓦沙甘，在媒体上公开过招，遂酿成一个全国课题，主流报章更是大肆炒作民联内部的矛盾。

马尼卡及查尔斯是通过媒体喊话，不满邓章钦批评他们在反对巴生巴士车站搬迁到中路的事件上，行为有如一名反对党党员和撒谎者。

查尔斯曾公开挑战邓章钦出示证据，显示他已经遭国阵收买；而马尼卡更直指邓章钦，是新巴士车站发展商的法律顾问，间中存有隐藏利益。

至于邓章钦则出示巴生市议会有关北区巴士总站搬迁和塞车汇报会会议纪录，炮轰两人在市议会会议里头没反对，只在会议外反对车站搬迁，形同说谎和不诚实，并认为两人的举止已令民联蒙羞。

作为抗议，一度酝酿退党的马尼卡（左图）已辞去公正党雪州署理主席职。查尔斯则促请邓章钦自行卸下雪州能力、公信力及透明特选委员会主席职，并要求邓章钦公开道歉。

此外，查尔斯也打算致函行动党纪律委员会，对邓章钦的言论提出投诉。

邓章钦支持者不满双重标准

有鉴于此，邓章钦的政治生涯，可能将在下周一举行的中央执行委员会会议上，面对严峻的考验。

这名特立独行的资深从政者，与党内强人林吉祥和其儿子——秘书长林冠英不咬弦，早已不是新鲜事。他之前也曾公开批评党领袖，掀起数次类似的争议，但在公众舆论的支持下，却每次皆能逃过一劫，没被党对付。

不过，若周一的中央执行委员会会议，议决把邓章钦交由纪律委员会处理，那么他的政治生涯便将出现危机，甚至连党籍也可能被冻结。

当然，若此事成真，肯定会掀起热烈的舆论，因为这是大马史上首名州议会议长，面临党纪律处分。

据悉，邓章钦的支持者也为此而感到忿忿不平，批评党在此事采取双重标准，只瞄准他一人，放任另外两名议员，继续在外向媒体放话。况且邓章钦也根本没有如其他人般，公然违背雪州民联政府的决策。

《我的领袖》文章掀起争议

据了解，邓章钦早前便已因在《东方日报》发表一篇名为《我的领袖》的专栏文章，被指讥刺党内领袖，而遭中央执行委员会的谴责。

该篇文章刊登在去年11月7日的《东方日报》，被指影射党内“神化”一些领袖的现象。

最具争议性的是，邓章钦在文章末端的文字：“我的领袖，你真是一条好狗，不愧让我给你取个好名字”。

消息指出，行动党中央执行委员会是在11月份的某次会议上，通过议决案谴责邓章钦，作为发表该篇文章的惩罚。

消息告诉《当今大马》，邓章钦当时因有要事在身，而缺席有关会议，但却在下一次的中委会会议中，翻查会议记录时，才赫然发现本身被谴责一事。

消息指出，邓章钦发现此事后，即场在会议上质问，为何他会遭到谴责。

辩称仅文学性描述政坛现象

消息说，邓氏当时辩称，该篇文章并没针对任何人，反之只是在描述政坛上的一个概况和现象，属于“文学性及哲学性”的手法。

“邓章钦当时还表示，如果要对号入座的话，该篇文章其实可说是具有每一个人的影子。”

不过，消息强调，当日的中委会仅是“斥责”（rebuke）邓章钦，并没向他发出“黄卡”或警告。

邓章钦：我准备面对一切

针对可能遭党对付的传言，邓章钦今午接受《当今大马》访问时，只简短地表示不知情，惟他强调将出席周一的中央执行委员会会议，而且做好心理准备面对一切。

“对付就对付吧，作领袖就要敢担当，没有担当就不要做领袖。我们要为全民利益着想，不是单考虑个人政治前途。”

询及是否将在会前“特别准备”时，他直截了当地说：“不需要，我对于全部事情都非常熟悉，了如指掌。”

查尔斯拟致函投诉邓章钦

另一方面，查尔斯（右图）告诉《当今大马》，本身仍在准备该封投诉邓章钦的信函，因为他需时翻译邓氏在中文媒体上发表的言论。

不过他强调，这么做只是要还本身一个清白，毕竟该番诽谤性谈话，已让他的诚信遭到质疑。

他举例，本身有次与家人共进晚餐时，突遭一些人走过来询问，是否已被国阵收买。

他对邓章钦会否遭到纪律对付的传闻，表示丝毫不知情。

“我不属于任何派系，我的目的很明显，即干回自己的工作。人们选中了我，我就得为他们提供更透明和更多参与度的地方事务资讯”

“我只不过是要求公开巴生车站特许经营权的详情，尽管有一些不同的意见，仍应该就事论事。”

以下附录邓章钦刊登在《东方日报》的专栏文章《我的领袖》全文：

我的领袖真伟大，英明神武，气霸山河。

他是天生的领袖，出世时满室芬芳、满天红霞、百鸟齐鸣、百花齐放，注定一生要当领导；他的血统纯正，基因优质，根正苗红，注定一生是荣华富贵。

在人人的眼中，他英勇善战，勇抗异族，捍卫我族，是天下公认的民族英雄；舍命捍卫疆土是它的特点，不容任何敌人入侵是他的专长。

因为他是领袖，他决定了族群里战士的生杀大权，所以谁来担任前锋后卫，谁必须坐冷板凳，全部由他来主宰。他的每一个指令，都是圣旨，不得违抗，否则就是犯了欺君之罪，得以诛之。

他的喜怒哀乐主宰了族群的情绪波动，任何异议，都是触犯扰乱群体的罪行，是破坏团结的罪孽。

所有的追随者，都愿意默默的跟从他，默默的付出；即使有时候他犯了劂~，也有追随者愿意挺身而出，为他护航；即使有时候一髡A饱A也有追随者愿意誓死捍卫，因为在追随者眼里，那只不过是瑕不掩瑜的事情。

我的领袖永远不会饱A是大家不了解他而自己犯饱C

他把夺取回来的战利品公平分给大家，但在分派给大家之前，先把最肥美的那一块，留给自己的孩子；这不是罪过，那是他表现最真挚的父母之爱，是大家应该模仿的榜样，因为他是我的领袖。

当他面对逆境的时候，那就是整个族群的困境，是整个族群的危机，族里每一分子都有责任为他分忧，唯有他能享有这样的荣耀。

当他赢得战役的时候，那是它个人的英明神武，族群里的力量微不足道，算得了什么？荣耀永远归于我的领袖，耻辱永远是追随者的。

不过，他也不是硬崩崩的，他是个能屈能伸的战士；在战场上扬威时，他锐不可当，耀武扬威；但是当被抓回笼里时，他会乖乖地等我来喂食。

我的领袖，你真是一条好狗，不愧让我给你取个好名字。

Anwar-Topple Timing Gone ! Now Facing Reality to Console Your Committed ones !

05th January Malaysiaparty 's [NOW] News of Week
(picked from themalaysianinsider.com) :
http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/index.php/opinion/breaking-views/136-breaking-views/15113-pakatan-rakyat-woes

Pakatan Rakyat woes

JAN 2 — Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim knew it. He knew that once the excitement of pushing Barisan Nasional all the way on March 8 was replaced by greed, personal interest, petty politics, narrow political ideology and race issues, he would have a battle keeping the dream of a two party system alive.

That is why he huffed and puffed and talked up the possibilities of a mass crossover of elected representatives from the Barisan Nasional to Pakatan Rakyat from the word go. There was an element of self interest, sure. After spending six years in prison, having his reputation pockmarked by Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad and written off as a historical footnote, nothing would have satisfied him more than being sworn is as the prime minister of Malaysia.

But it was not all about satisfying one man’s ambition. He knew that the euphoria which accompanied the Opposition’s super showing in Election 2008 could not be maintained indefinitely. At some point, the heady mix of social activists, educationists, career politicians, professionals that made up Pakatan Rakyat would clash, the result of inexperience in governing; unrealistic expectations and differences in ideology.

Truth be told, this mixed constituency was a major plus point for the coalition during the election. They allowed Pakatan Rakyat to reach out to a wider spectrum of voters than the Barisan Nasional and allowed Pakatan Rakyat candidates to speak more convincingly on an important raft of issues, from corruption to the rights of Indians.

But Anwar knew that it would only be a matter of time before the hardliners in Pas lifted the lid on their pet topic — hudud and the Islamic state. This conservative spine of the party reluctantly agreed to put their main platform on the backburner in the run up to the polls. With elections over and Pas in a strong position, it was going to be more challenging persuading Pas leaders to keep their calling card buried. Once hudud was raised again, DAP’s veteran politicians would strike back. This scenario is being played out right now following comments made by Pas’ Husam Musa during a debate with Umno’s Khairy Jamaluddin.

Anwar also understood one fact of political life in Malaysia — race is never far from the surface. What more when it is wrapped up in unrealistic expectations. The Malays, Chinese and Indians in Pakatan Rakyat were willing to speak the language of accommodation and unity in the run up to the polls. They had to be on the same wavelength to be taken seriously as an alternative to Barisan Nasional.

Ironically, the strong showing on March 8 led some Pakatan Rakyat MPs to believe that the role of their communities — and not the common platform or the excesses of BN — was pivotal in their electoral success. As a result, they pushed for positions and contracts, and sought instant remedies, some of which had been promised to them before the elections.

PKR’s S. Manikavasagam said as much when he criticised the party’s leadership. He alleged that PKR was a Malay-centric party, lamenting that Indians had not been offered senior positions in government-linked companies, state agencies and local councils.

“We feel cheated, we are disappointed. Nothing has been done, ‘’ he said, accusing Selangor Menteri Besar Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim of not keeping promises made to the Indian community.

He is not the only one feeling aggrieved. Some Malay politicians in Pakatan Rakyat are uneasy over the demands being made by the Indians and the uncompromising stance by DAP’s veteran leaders on several issues.

Is Anwar surprised by these troubles? Hardly. He knew that many of his political comrades came together because of their intense hatred for BN and what it stands for. Once that anger dissipated, it was always going to be a challenge keeping everyone focused on the big goal — staying as one and keeping the two-party dream alive.

Pakatan Cracking ? (Prelude)

05th January Malaysiaparty 's [NOW] News of Week
by { JP }

More and more critics onto Pakatan 's Selangor state government arisen recently. But this is still NOT arouse the "sudden power" to open up their eyes.

Malaysiakini reported this =>

Rumblings against Khalid

Stanley Koh | Dec 29, 08 3:21pm

By governing standards, some may agree that the Pakatan Rakyat coalition rule in Selangor is still on a learning curve since the political tsunami on March 8 when the opposition parties of PKR, DAP and PAS snatched control of five states from the Barisan Nasional. Gathering momentum of dissatisfaction Reforming bureaucrats not an easy task

Read more at http://malaysiakini.com/news/95560

and lead to this >>also on Malaysiakini) =>

The bus station that tore the opposition apart

S Pathmawathy | Dec 31, 08 2:53pm

It is easy to understand why a number of politicians in Pakatan Rakyat are being torn asunder by the relocation of the Klang bus station. The Pakatan-controlled Selangor government has last Saturday ordered all city transit operations be moved from the old Klang bus station - which is in the town centre - to a newly-constructed bus station seven kilometres away. Not surprisingly, Klang residents are up in arms - Klang Sentral in Jalan Meru, the new station, is located in the outskirts of the city. 'Hidden agenda' behind relocation Old station - convenient stopping point

Read more at http://malaysiakini.com/news/95634

with the tricksy MP to swing swang swung around, threatened to leave PKR ? but finally not leaving and then highly published his "charming" character with invitation to join Barisan:

"No thanks," was his response to the invitation from Selangor Umno liaison committee chairman Tan Sri Muhammad Muhammad Taib and state opposition leader Datuk Seri Dr Mond Khir Toyo.
Read more at http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/index.php/malaysia/15172-kapar-mp-says-he-will-live-or-die-with-pkr


Finally, the DAP Lim had to warn Anwar to disciplin his members:

DAP: Anwar, disiplinkan orang PKR

Jan 2, 09 8:19pm

DAP meminta penasihat PKR Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim memastikan pemimpin parti itu lebih berdisiplin dalam usaha mengekalkan Pakatan Rakyat terus diterima rakyat, lapor Bernama.

Read more at http://malaysiakini.com/news/95751

回教党再来一回, 民联肯定会屌臭吗 ?

30th December Malaysiaparty 's [NOW] News of Week
(picked from Malaysiakini.com) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/95411

12月30日 党讯精選
(转摘自《当今大马》 Malaysiakini ) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/95411

卡巴星警告回教党要知本身界限
坦言行动党瓜登助选热忱受影响
李伟伦 12月24日 下午4点52分

在瓜登国席补选前夕，民联内部却突然因为回教党副主席的一席执政后落实回教刑事法言论而闹分歧。

民主行动党全国主席卡巴星今日措辞强烈地警告回教党，要知道行动党的忍耐度有限，该党更需知道本身的界限在哪。

他表示，尽管行动党仍会为回教党的补选候选人助选，惟助选的热忱肯定已受到影响。

他也再次促请人民公正党实权领袖安华，必须打破沉默，挺身表明立场，因为此事已关乎公众利益。

声称回教党公信力受损

被称为“日落洞之虎”的卡巴星，显然对回教党副主席胡桑慕沙的回教刑事法言论，仍未释怀，不断“提醒”回教党在行事前，必须顾及民联盟党的共识。

“我希望他们往后可以更加小心，我相信回教党的公信力已因胡桑慕沙的言论，受到影响。”

“最重要的是公正党实权领袖（安华）必须表明立场，打破沉默，他不能再保持安静。”

“行动党已经开腔，因为这是一个关系公众利益的课题。如今已是时候让行动党促请回教党，他们的行事有个界限，而我们的忍耐度也有个限度。”

重申1999年落败经验

卡巴星也引述替阵在1999年的大选成绩，提醒回教党勿忘历史教训。

他说，替阵在1999年发布的联合竞选宣言中，内容并不包括成立一个回教国，惟回教党却在选举两天前单方面宣布，一旦夺下登嘉楼州，就要在登州成立回教州。

“这造成了我们的候选人，在自己的堡垒区落马，包括（行动党顾问）林吉祥和我自己都落败。”

“阿巴斯可为回教党上课”

卡巴星表示，曾担任回教党登州行政议员的前最高法院院长沙烈阿巴斯，曾在一宗案件中裁决，我国是一个世俗国而非回教国。

他强调，回教党不能违抗宪法，也不能违抗当时我国最高级法庭，即最高法院所作出的裁决。

“回教党可以去询问沙烈阿巴斯，或许他可以给回教党上一堂课。”

他也表示，在308政治海啸后，人民殷切期盼两线制成型，回教党应该避免“击沉自己的船”。

认为胡桑慕沙已撤立场

回教党副主席胡桑慕沙是在星期日于吉兰丹州的一项政治论坛上，受到巫青团副团长凯里的逼问时表示，若民联执政中央，回教党将推动实行回教刑事法。

不过，由于引起一片哗然，胡桑在相隔一日后即澄清，若无法获得民联其他两个盟党，即行动党及公正党的支持，回教党就必须搁置落实回教刑事法的意愿。

对此，卡巴星把之诠释为，胡桑慕沙已撤回相关立场，并希望回教党不会再重提此事。

询及是否圈套一时语塞

由于胡桑当时是在巫青团副团长凯里的挑战下，才发表推行回教刑事法的言论，于是记者就询问卡巴星，是否同意这是一个巫统所设下的圈套。

一向口才便给的卡巴星，却罕见语塞数秒后才表示，“嗯，这很难说，但不管怎样，就算有人设下陷阱，胡桑也必须小心在意，勿掉入陷阱中。”
声称回教党公信力受损
重申1999年落败经验
认为胡桑慕沙已撤立场
询及是否圈套一时语塞
(above picked from http://malaysiakini.com/news/95411)

选举前耍戏 {回教党不会单边行动实施[回教刑事法]!}

30th December Malaysiaparty 's [NOW] News of Week
(picked from Malaysiakini.com) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/95292

12月30日 党讯精選
(转摘自《当今大马》 Malaysiakini ) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/95292

执政后实施回教刑事法论掀波
胡桑澄清：没盟党支持难落实
12月22日 晚上8点02分
因发表民联执政中央必实施回教刑事法的言论，而掀起政坛一阵哗然的回教党副主席兼吉兰丹州行政议员胡桑慕沙今日澄清说，若无法获得民联其他两个盟党，即行动党及公正党的支持，回教党就必须搁置落实回教刑事法的意愿。

民联签署协议不单边行动

胡桑慕沙指出，这是因为民联三党已经在今年8月签署协议，同意任何政策的改变，都必须预先获得民联成员党的一致同意。

他也保证，回教党不会采取单边行动。所有的政策必须获得各方的同意。

遭凯里质问发表惊人言论

胡桑慕沙是在一项吉兰丹州哥打峇鲁举行的“大马政治的转变”政治论坛上，与巫青团副团长凯里同台时，遭到凯里指责回教党领袖自从在308大选之后，即摒弃及漠视回教刑事法，并质问若民联成功在916夺取中央政权后是否会落实回教刑事法。

结果当时他就回应说，一旦民联执政中央政府，回教党必定会实施回教刑事法。

也是吉兰丹州行政议员的胡桑慕沙强调，实施回教刑事法，不仅是回教党的责任，而是所有回教徒的责任，包括巫统的领导层都责无旁贷。

不过论坛另一名主讲人，即国际回教大学法律系教授阿都阿兹博士则表示，州政府无权落实刑事法，因为那是处于中央政府的权限之下。

凯里当晚支持隔日却改口

根据《星报》星期日的报道，论坛主持人国大政治系讲师莫哈末阿谷斯随后也“火上加油”，反问凯里若他在明年3月的巫统党选中，成功出任巫青团长之后，是否会支持推行刑事法？

结果凯里笑着回答说，他将会支持落实回教刑事法。凯里的回答，顿时引起回教党支持者高喊口号。唯凯里在隔日的《星报》报道(即今日)，马上改口否认他曾经说过这番话，并说一切将维持现状。

在胡桑慕沙的言论出街之后，民主行动党国会领袖林吉祥马上发表声明，除了强调推行回教刑事法并不是民联政策之外，并敦促胡桑澄清其言论，否则将令华裔选民感到不安。

也是怡保东区国会议员的林吉祥表示，若未加以澄清，胡桑的言论不仅将让在1月17日瓜拉登嘉楼的11%华裔选民感到不安，同时将引起其他登嘉楼州及全国马来人及非马来人更大的不安与反感。
民联签署协议不单边行动
遭凯里质问发表惊人言论
凯里当晚支持隔日却改口
(above picked from http://malaysiakini.com/news/95292)

Toppling <=> Hudud; Anwar main Concern ? Hudud <-> Toppling; toppling <-> hudud ...

30th December Malaysiaparty 's [NOW] News of Week
(picked from themalaysianinsider.com) :
http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/index.php/malaysia/14777-anwar-eyes-east-malaysia-despite-pacts-troubles

Anwar eyes East Malaysia despite pact’s troubles
KUALA LUMPUR, Dec 25 — While his allies argue over hudud laws and fret over the wobbling economy in their five states, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim has taken over as liaison chairman for both Sabah and Sarawak in Parti Keadilan Rakyat's (PKR) efforts widen its base and capture the Borneo states.

The opposition leader, who made a triumphant parliamentary comeback in August, is initially eyeing Sarawak in the next state elections due by 2011 as chief minister Tan Sri Abdul Taib Mahmud faces increased opposition to his 27 years in power.

Sabah is a different proposition as the ruling Barisan Nasional coalition is dominant with 57 of the 60 seats in the state assembly.
malaysiakini to post this ==>
But consumed with garnering more support from both states, Anwar has been conspicuously silent about the controversy over implementing Islamic criminal Hudud laws that flared up again this week between Pas and DAP, and Pakatan Rakyat state governments’ efforts to mitigate the fallout from a growing global recession.

“Some things are out of his hand. Anwar will quietly handle Pas and DAP behind the scenes but the economy will take some work,” a Pakatan Rakyat source told The Malaysian Insider, adding the electoral pact had made suggestions in the budget debate.

The PKR supreme council met late Monday night but party president Datuk Seri Wan Azizah Wan Ismail, who is Anwar’s wife, only announcement was that Anwar has taken over as liaison chairman for Sabah and Sarawak, citing the appointment as proof of the party's focus to struggle for the people from Perlis to Sarawak.

“The agenda to bring change in Sabah and Sarawak needs the support from all levels of society. Sarawak will have its state elections soon and Datuk Seri Anwar’s appointment as state liaison chairman for both states justify our concern for problems there and is significant in Pakatan Rakyat’s power transition to Putrajaya,” she said in a statement issued on Tuesday.

The Pakatan Rakyat electoral pact, which groups PKR, Pas and DAP, has 81 out of the 222 seats in the federal parliament. BN has 137 seats while the Sabah Progressive Party (SAPP), which pulled out of BN in September, has two seats and one to Independent Datuk Ibrahim Ali. The Kuala Terengganu seat is vacant with the by-election on Jan 17.

PKR’s focus for the Borneo states has been apparent when Anwar predicted he could form capture Putrajaya by Malaysia Day with help from 30 federal lawmakers after Pakatan Rakyat made a historic upset in the March 8 General Elections where BN lost its customary two-thirds parliamentary majority and four more states to the opposition.

Since then, only SAPP has pulled out of the 14-member BN coalition but has chosen to remain independent in Parliament although its president Datuk Yong Teck Lee is close to the sacked deputy prime minister, who has yet to fulfil his prediction to unseat BN from power.

Anwar, in a posting at his weblog today, called the changes routine and said the state leadership in the party are merely coordinators in an effort to dispel notions of consolidating power for himself as “experienced leaders will be act as advisors at the national level while the new leadership will get exposure apart from introducing new approaches to attract new members”.

“Personally, I am not inclined to coordinate activities in Sabah and Sarawak. In fact, even Wilayah Persekutuan asked me to help but I feel that Tan Sri Khalid as Selangor Menteri Besar, is better there,” Anwar said, adding the appointments will be reviewed regularly.

He also said his offer to help both PKR state liaison committees has been announced before and he hoped to get support from all quarters in both states.

Apart from Anwar heading both Sabah and Sarawak, and Khalid leading Selangor and Wilayah Persekutuan, the other state leaders are Datuk Fauzi Abdul Rahman (Pahang), Datuk Zahrain Mohamed Hashim (Penang), Datuk Kamarul Baharin Abbas (Negri Sembilan), Ahmad Kassim (Kedah), Abdul Aziz Abdul Kadir (Kelantan), Johari Shafie (Perlis), Khalid Jaafar (Malacca), Dr Zaliha Mustaffa (Johor), Osman Abdul Rahman (Perak) and Wan Rahim Wan Hamzah (Terengganu).
(above picked http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/index.php/malaysia/14777-anwar-eyes-east-malaysia-despite-pacts-troubles)

蔡添强并非对“卡巴星的言论“不敬” ! 周美芬该抨的不敢講; 卻对敵党的内部矛盾滔滔不绝 !!

30th December Malaysiaparty 's [NOW] News of Week
(picked from Malaysiakini.com) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/95422

12月30日 党讯精選
(转摘自《当今大马》 Malaysiakini ) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/95422

辩护公正党回教课题立场鲜明
林秀凌：各造无须再大做文章
12月24日 傍晚6点13分
针对回教党副主席胡桑慕沙日前发表落实回教刑事法的言论，公正党澄清该党宣传主任蔡添强已履行他身为党全国宣传主任职责，就事论事代表公正党阐明该党在此课题上的立场。

人民公正党中央宣传局媒体协调主任林秀凌指出，蔡添强并非对“行动党主席卡巴星的言论“不敬”，身为民联主要领导之一，卡巴星和其他领导有同等的责任澄清公众对民联的疑惑。

她澄清，蔡添强指“没有必要凡事都要安华亲自回应”，意指任何一个民联成员党的领导，可在已经达致共识的政策和议题上发言，而蔡氏身为公正党全国宣传主任，必然有责任代表党和民联阐明立场。

她说，人民公正党对回教国、回教刑事法、新经济政策等课题，已多次发表鲜明立场。民联也已联邦民主宪法为我们斗争的共识，此事无须多次重提。

与国阵一言堂模式不同

林秀凌今天也发表文告抨击马华全国妇女组主席周美芬不敢批判巫统的霸权，更不敢抗议巫统漠视国阵成员党的意愿，强行种族主义的政策，反而在此事件上大做文章，这也显示出周氏对民联的执政纲领，以及与国阵截然不同的运作一窍不通。

“民联由人民公正党、民主行动党和回教党联合组成，各党领导平起平坐，在任何课题和政策上有分歧，大可直接和党领袖反映立场和交流；民联秉持民主开放的政治文化，任何课题都可以自由讨论，各党都可以商讨不同的党议程。”

她继称，民联三党领导必须在民联会议上达成共识后，才可对外宣布立场或看法，任何成员党要做出任何改变之前，也必须获得民联认同，再由民联领袖安华作出公布。

“这与巫统主导的国阵截然不同。周美芬也许认同巫统的霸权及一言堂文化，我们实在无法苟同。”

民联纲领没纳入刑事法

林秀凌也是公正党全国青年团中委，她认为，无论如何回教党领袖发表有关回教刑事法的言论，不是什么新鲜课题，不过民联的政治纲领并没有将之纳入其中。

“民联成立于今年4月1日，是以7项大原则作为执政纲领，即维护联邦宪法精神、确保宗教与文化自由、透明化行政机制、建立公正司法制度、推行全民经济议程、保障媒体和资讯自由、塑造民主社会。”
与国阵一言堂模式不同
民联纲领没纳入刑事法
(above picked from http://malaysiakini.com/news/95422)

庆幸916失败告终, 否则大马已成回教刑事法的回教国 ! ! !

30th December Malaysiaparty 's [NOW] News of Week
(picked from Malaysiakini.com) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/95246

12月30日 党讯精選
(转摘自《当今大马》 Malaysiakini ) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/95246

回教党副主席胡桑慕沙日前所提出的“若民联执政中央就会全面实施回教法”，已经引起极大的回响，甚至可能成为下个月举行的瓜拉登嘉楼补选中，其中一个热门的竞选课题。

民主行动党国会领袖林吉祥今日发表声明，除了强调推行回教刑事法并不是民联政策之外，并敦促胡山澄清其言论，否则将令华裔选民感到不安。

行动党坚持世俗国立场不变

林吉祥也是怡保东区国会议员，他表示，若未加以澄清，胡桑的言论不仅将让在1月17日瓜拉登嘉楼的11%华裔选民感到不安，同时将引起其他登嘉楼州及全国马来人及非马来人更大的不安与反感。

“实行回教刑事法不是民联的政策，胡桑应澄清他实际上说了些什么。”

“民主行动党坚持我们的先辈们，在国家于51年前独立时所达致的社会契约中同意世俗立国的立场，而这个立场由始至终不变。”

李伟杰指责回教党违反宣言

另一边厢，马华中央党部发言人李伟杰对民联的人民主权沦为“回教刑事法”感到非常失望，更对这种欺骗人民的政治手段感到遗憾。

他说，日前回教党副主席胡桑慕沙所提出的“若民联执政中央就会全面实施回教法”，已经全面违反该党福利国的宣言，形如背叛选民。

也是马华新闻局主任的李伟杰指出，在308大选前，回教党为了捞取开明的巫裔选民及非巫裔的选票，堂皇地推出了福利国的宣言。

“当时公正党与行动党全力支持回教党，更在308之后组成民联，共同执政5州。数月前民联尝试要拉拢国阵国会议员跳槽，以夺取中央政权，不过最后以失败告终。”

“马华庆幸国阵议员站稳立场，没有轻信安华的花招。如果当初真的出现变天，可能大马现在已经成为实行回教刑事法的回教国。”

促民联书面保证不实行回教国

他说，为了安抚人民因回教国议题而引起的紧张情绪，马华促请民联应效仿之前三党签署的协议，白纸黑字地做出以下的书面保证：

1）根据宪法，马来西亚的政体是君主立宪制，并通过民选的议会制度选出国家领导人，任何人都不许通过回教国的实行，尝试颠覆宪法；

2）在联邦宪法之下，回教只是大马官方宗教，人民也享有宗教自由，绝对不能通过回教刑事法剥夺各族人民的宗教自由。

他说，公正党与行动党的国会议席占有59席，远远超过只有23席的回教党。若这两党无法说服回教党放弃成立回教国的野心，并保证大马不会沦为回教国，那么两党就应该探讨退出民联或开除回教党。
行动党坚持世俗国立场不变
李伟杰指责回教党违反宣言
促民联书面保证不推回教国
(above picked from http://malaysiakini.com/news/95246)

Anwar ~ Silent means Consent ~ Hudud, ok ?

29th December Malaysiaparty 's [SPot] Special Report
(picked from themalaysianinsider.com) :
http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/index.php/malaysia/14756-pressure-on-anwar-to-clarify-pr-stand-on-hudud-grows

Pressure on Anwar to clarify PR stand on hudud grows
By Shannon Teoh
KUALA LUMPUR, Dec 24 — More voices have joined the roiling debate over hudud, with Wanita MCA adding to the number of those calling for Opposition Leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim to clarify Pakatan Rakyat’s (PR) stand on the matter.
malaysiakini to post this ==>
Earlier today, DAP chairman Karpal Singh had also repeated his call for Anwar to “break his silence, as DAP has done so” with regards to the support for hudud by Pas, the third partner of the coalition.

Pas vice-president Datuk Husam Musa had said that the Islamist party has not forgotten its aim to implement hudud, which prescribes amputation, whipping and stoning for criminal offences, should it come into power.

When DAP criticised the statement, Pas spiritual leader Datuk Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat challenged DAP to make its case as to why hudud laws are not acceptable.

“Husam’s statement has resulted in anxiety among non-Muslims in the country. Pas firmly insisting on introducing hudud has ignored the fact that Malaysia is a multi-racial and multi-religious country and the spirit of Federal Constitution”, Wanita MCA chief Datin Paduka Chew Mei Fun said today.

Given that Karpal and DAP secretary-general Lim Guan Eng have already asked Anwar to clarify, Chew said that the de facto PKR leader must “respect the request of the two DAP leaders and respond to Husam's remark accordingly.”

“If Anwar decides to keep quiet, there are only two possibilities, one; Anwar agrees with the remark made by Husam to implement hudud or DAP has been marginalised in PR,” she said.

Karpal had this morning said that the backing of hudud was hurting Pas's credibility and it should be more careful about breaking ranks in the future.

He reminded reporters of the electoral alliance in 1999 where Pas had agreed not to include the formation of an Islamic state in the manifesto.

However, two days before the election, Pas announced it would establish an Islamic state if it took over the state government of Terengganu. Karpal insisted that this proclamation had cost many DAP leaders, including himself and Lim Kit Siang, to lose in the general elections.

With that in mind, he said that DAP had limited “political patience” but was satisfied for now that Husam has backtracked in stating that Pas must obtain a consensus from its PR partners.

“We will still campaign and give our full support to whichever candidate is selected for the Kuala Terengganu by-election,” he assured.
(above picked from http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/index.php/malaysia/14756-pressure-on-anwar-to-clarify-pr-stand-on-hudud-grows)

两头蛇应表明回教法立场 ! ! !

29th December Malaysiaparty 's [NOW] News of Week
(picked from Malaysiakini.com) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/95343

12月29日 党讯精選
(转摘自《当今大马》 Malaysiakini ) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/95343

安华公正党不能再保持沉默
民主行动党主席卡巴星今日发表文告，要求国会反对党领袖安华表明对回教党坚持要落实回教刑事法的立场。

“面对（吉兰丹州务大臣）聂阿兹不惜一切要在国内落实回教刑事法的最后通牒，人民公正党实权领袖安华不能再保持沉默，公正党应该通过其最高领袖发表看法。”

回教党副主席胡桑慕沙表明该党一旦执政将实施回教刑事法的言论，恰好碰上瓜拉登嘉楼补选即将“开战”，其言论马上成为国阵瞄准攻击民联的补选课题。

民主行动党最高领袖包括秘书长林冠英、资深领袖林吉祥与卡巴星都在第一时间明确反对回教刑事法，相较之下人民公正党领袖则鲜少主动评论此事，目前表明态度反对的只有宣传主任蔡添强和雪州大臣卡立。

回教法破坏民联大选后成就

卡巴星促请聂阿兹确保回教党停止在国内推动回教刑事法，因为这只会破坏民联在308大选后所创下的成就。

“面对行动党的强力反对，回教党恫言要一意孤行落实回教刑事法，对回教党来说只会构成反效果。”

就连穆斯林也不认同回教法

他指出，回教刑事法不仅遭到非穆斯林所反对，就连一些穆斯林也不认同，强行落实只会破坏种族和谐。

“回教党不应只考虑短期政治利益，反而破坏了国内各民族的长期利益。”

卡巴星也提醒聂阿兹，联邦宪法清楚表明马来西亚是世俗国，不容实施回教刑事法；1988年最高法院五司一致认为马来西亚是世俗国，而且领导五司的前最高法院院长敦沙列阿巴斯，曾在回教党执政登嘉楼时出任州行政议员。

“回教党领袖包括聂阿兹，不应再不断地藐视联邦宪法，坚持推行回教刑事法。”
安华公正党不能再保持沉默
回教法破坏民联大选后成就
就连穆斯林也不认同回教法
(part of the above picked from http://malaysiakini.com/news/95343)

两位青年领袖-凯里胡桑, 徐徐带出回教刑事法 !

29th December Malaysiaparty 's [NOW] News of Week
(picked from Malaysiakini.com) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/95342

12月29日 党讯精選
(转摘自《当今大马》 Malaysiakini ) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/95342

揶揄胡桑回教法立场大转弯
凯里援引可兰经文震惊四座
12月23日 下午4点49分
虽然巫青团副团长凯里与回教党副主席胡桑慕沙上周的同台辩论已经告一段落，但是凯里今日继续通过部落格，揶揄这名吉兰丹州行政议员尽管信誓旦旦推行回教刑事法，但是最终却轻易向民主行动党压力低头。

“他（胡桑）信誓旦旦要在马来西亚推行回教刑事法的言论尚未退热，就已经在行动党的压力下低头认输。”

凯里与胡桑慕沙上周末在吉兰丹州哥打峇鲁举行的“大马政治的转变”政治论坛同台辩论，遭到凯里指责回教党领袖自从在308大选之后，即摒弃及漠视回教刑事法，并质问若民联成功在916夺取中央政权后是否会落实回教刑事法。

胡桑两度重申将推回教法

凯里在部落格撰文说，当时候胡桑慕沙回答说，“我们将会做”。当凯里再次向胡桑求证时，胡桑也举手再度强调，“我们将会做”。

凯里进一步揶揄，在胡桑发表言论不到24小时，行动党国会领袖林吉祥对胡桑的言论提出质疑，并强调回教刑事法并非民联的政策。

他说，在行动党的抨击与压力下，在哥打峇鲁政治论坛上看来斗志高昂的胡桑，突然萎缩及向行动党低头。

“胡桑在本身阵营向回教党中坚支持者保证，一旦将会推行回教刑事法，才不到两天的时间就投降了，并声称推行回教刑事法必须获得民联其他‘资深’盟党的同意。”

质问回教党原则去了哪里？

他批评，胡桑的言论在极短时间内大转弯，再一次证明回教党必须向行动党俯首称臣。

“胡桑在致开幕词时所提出的回教党原则去了哪里？难道原则是可以如此轻易丢弃？”

评论凯里比胡桑略胜一筹

另一方面，马来双周刊《政治》（Siasah）编辑莫哈末沙余迪（Mohd Sayuti Omar）也在部落格撰文，声称胡桑在当晚的表现不如凯里，甚至多次跌入自己多设下的陷阱。

他说，尽管胡桑在这个於回教党大本营举行的论坛开始时显得非常自信，并对国阵与巫统做出各种批评，但是凯里过后一出场的表现却令人惊艳，并频频对胡桑做出反击，直到胡桑哑口无言。

凯里援引可兰经震惊四座

他说，一出场即援引可兰经句子的凯里震惊四座，指国阵目前正推行政治转变，包括成立反贪委员会、司法委员会与修改大专法令。

针对胡桑指308大选已经改变了巫统与国阵，凯里也反唇相讥，指回教党也在这场政治海啸中深受其害，把国会反对党领袖的宝座拱手让给在2004年仅获得一个议席的人民公正党。

凯里也表示，回教党无需以出让霹雳州务大臣为荣，因为州的权力仍然真正掌握在行动党的手上。

凯里甚至提出疑问，选民在308大选是否真的改变倾向，抑或只是投下反对票，并且会在问题解决后回到国阵的怀抱。

针对胡桑批评巫统没有奉行真正的回教教义，凯里提出反问，为何回教党又与其他并非奉行相同回教理念的政党组成人民联盟？不过，胡桑反击说，行动党对于回教的认知，无疑的远比巫统还要好。

为“权力狂”指责激烈交锋

当胡桑批评凯里权力狂，包括凯里曾经批评公选盟举行的示威犹如猴子，并且在峇东铺补选时号称要埋葬安华等。不过，凯里也不甘示弱，举起腕表质问安华的916变天计划难道不是权力狂吗？

双方一来一往的激烈交锋，加上双方支持者的喧哗与掌声，让整个礼堂沸腾起来。

接着，轮到凯里主动出击，他抛出了回教刑事法的课题，质问胡桑一旦民联执政后是否会加以推行。

虽然胡桑明知道这是一个陷阱，但是他却不得不做出回应。他一面回答，一面把问题推给巫统说，“我们将会推行，但是如果你是真心要推行回教刑事法，那么你就应该在巫统大会上提出来”。

作法自毙的凯里显然楞了一下，无法回应胡桑的企图从这个课题上抽身而出，凯里并无法保证将在巫统大会上提出回教刑事法的课题。

凯里：57分，胡桑：43分

莫哈末沙余迪评论说，这两位未来马来政治明星在比较上，胡桑显得比较情绪化与受到压力，而凯里则以做客的心态显得谦虚及开放，并且做好心理和资料准备面对数以千计的回教党支持者。

他也给两人打分，从勇气、演讲姿态与辩论的精神上，凯里获得57分，而胡桑只获得43分。
胡桑两度重申将推回教法
为“权力狂”指责激烈交锋
凯里：57分，胡桑：43分
(above picked from http://malaysiakini.com/news/95342)

安华甚么什么未来首相人选, 更应该去看沟渠 ! ! !

27th December Malaysiaparty 's [SPot] Special Report
(picked from Malaysiakini.com) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/95387

12月27日 专题报导
(转摘自《当今大马》 Malaysiakini ) : hhttp://malaysiakini.com/news/95387

一句没必要凡事要安华回应惹祸
马华行动党罕见联手炮轰蔡添强
12月24日 下午1点22分

公正党宣传主任蔡添强（左图）反驳行动党主席卡巴星，声称国会反对党领袖兼公正党实权领袖安华没有必要回应回教党副主席胡桑慕沙所发表的落实回教刑事法言论的一席话惹祸，罕见地招致马华及行动党的联手炮轰。

根据报道，蔡添强是在昨日驳斥卡巴星要求安华回应胡桑慕沙发表若民联执政中央政府必定落实回教刑事法的言论，并表示若卡巴星有所不满，可直接约见胡桑慕沙本人或回教党领袖，没有必要凡事都要安华亲自回应。

蔡添强也说，安华作为未来首相人选，不可能小至街道清洁问题、禁酒等课题都要回应。而他身为公正党的宣传主任，已经代表公正党与民联的立场，即维护联邦宪法的精神，而回教党要做出任何改变之前，必须获得民联认同。

他也指出，既然胡桑已经澄清，回教党不会再没有咨询友党的情况下，冒然实施回教法，再加上这仅是胡桑在辩论时所提出的个人观点，不代表回教党的立场，所以卡巴星不应该在这课题上争执不休。

潘俭伟遗憾对卡巴星不敬

民主行动党全国宣传秘书兼灵北区国会议员潘俭伟（昨图）则发表文告，对蔡添强指行动党全国主席卡巴星“没必要凡事要安华回应”的言论感到非常遗憾，并认为蔡添强的言论是对一个资深领袖的不敬。

潘俭伟指出，卡巴星（右图）要求公正党实权领袖安华针对回教党副主席胡桑慕沙挑起“民联将实行回教刑事法”的言论做出回应并无任何不妥。因为安华除了是公正党的最高领袖外，他也是民联三党的核心人物之一，安华对回教刑事法的立场将深深影响人民对民联的看法。

潘俭伟也不认同蔡添强指“安华是未来的首相人选，就不可能小至街道清洁问题、禁酒课题都要他亲自回应”的言论。因为回教刑事法并不是地方民生问题，而是关系到国家的宪法精神和民联三党的结盟共识，由安华亲自回应此课题才能显得公正党是严正看待任何挑战我国宪法精神的言论。

潘俭伟也重申行动党坚决反对在我国实行回教刑事法，因为我国自建国以来就已经在宪法上阐明马来西亚是一个世俗民主国。他说，行动党对任何人尝试挑战宪法，要在我国落实回教刑事法都不会给予妥协。

安华立场是民联最终立场

另一方面，马华全国妇女组主席周美芬（右图）也力促安华必须针对胡桑的回教法言论表态，以向全体人民清楚说明该党及民联对回教法的立场和原则。

她说，胡桑在日前的一场辩论中，信誓旦旦的承诺该党将在执掌中央政权后，全面推行回教刑事法，已经引起非回教徒的疑虑。

“回教党执意要在马来西亚推行回教法，是一种完全漠视我国多元种族、多元宗教国情的狭隘态度，更是对我国联邦宪法的世俗精神的一种严重藐视。”

周美芬强调，安华作为在公正党中掌握最高权力的实权领袖，以及作为民联的最高领袖，如果不在回教党要推行回教法的课题上做出任何明确的交待或看法，是完全说不过去的。

“更何况，行动党秘书长林冠英以及主席卡巴星已经先后要求安华针对有关课题发言，显示安华的立场才是民联的最终立场。”

认同胡桑抑或边缘行动党？

“除非林冠英和卡巴星在民联的地位可有可无，否则安华应该尊重两位同僚的意愿，立即对胡桑的言论表态。如果安华继续保持沉默，那就有两种可能：一、他默认胡桑的言论，即民联一旦执掌中央将推行回教法；二、行动党在所谓平起平坐的民联里被公正党及回教党边缘化，以致其秘书长和主席的要求都无法获得任何满足或回应。”

她也认为蔡添强在回应卡巴星时表示“安华作为未来首相人选，不可能小至街道清洁问题、禁酒等课题都要回应”，是非常荒谬的说辞。

周美芬指出，推行回教法是一项事关国体、宪政、社会形态以及人民切身生活的重大课题，蔡添强将有关问题比喻为“街道清洁问题”，简直是太儿戏了。

“蔡氏即使要为安华推脱责任，也应该提出更具说服力的理由，而不是以如此轻蔑的态度去敷衍其民联同僚和广大人民。
(above picked from http://malaysiakini.com/news/95387)