MCA Deputy Minister Slams Hypocrite Bloggers in promoting [1 Sekolah Untuk Semua ]

25th May Malaysiaparty 's pick of to-day
(picked from JP-[the 3rd PARTY] )

by { JP }

With refering back to my previous article-[ Road to Demolish Our Last Wall ! ! [1 Apa Untuk Siapa ] which strongly slam against those hypocrites-racist blogger campaigning to urge Ministry of Education to implement [1 Sekolah Untuk Semua],
today the Deputy Minister of Education - Dr Wee Ka Siong come alongside to my view in slamming those blogger (those only with their hypocriticial and own-agenda or racist) who claimed that vernacular schools were causing racial tension in the country !!

The MCA Youth criticised some bloggers and an online petition supporting the "One School for All" campaign.
MCA Youth chief Datuk Dr Wee Ka Siong said MCA planned to take action against bloggers who claimed that vernacular schools were causing racial tension in the country.

Wee said MCA strongly disagreed with the statements made by bloggers and might lodge a police report against them or refer them to the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission.

as reported by [ the New Strait Times Online ] dated 2009/05/24 at http://www.nst.com.my/Current_News/NST/Sunday/National/2564859/Article/index_html

We, the Malaysian, strongly against racism; although some hypocrites are holding their own agenda to support such a diverse or deviated mind in claiming that our vernacular schools were causing racial tension in this country.
These group of mad doggy bloggers had subsequently tarnished blogger's community where few of them hold such the what what Presidential post in blogger alliance which had misleaded our nation that the "whole" blogsphere bloggers support their campaign in promoting that [ One School for All ] which sounded in diminish or demolish vernacular schools !!

Karma circle will show and to those hypocrites:-
{ Prepare yourselves for your devil deeds }

or eat my 4 letters word first:
{ FUCK you, racist }

Majority Urging to Dissolve DUN Perak

13th May Malaysiaparty 's pick of to-day
(picked from JP-[the 3rd PARTY] )

by { JP }

With an expected twist drama in Perak where Pakatan MB YAB Mohd Nizar and his executive councillors vacated their office seven hours after taking office; hugged in and depressed out again !!

To put aside our point of preference and prejudice, lets us review some of the fact points commented by our "drama" politicians and observers:

(1) UMNO - Dr. Mohd Khir Toyo said, (in his blog at http://www.drkhir.com/2009/05/dilema-perak-sidang-dun-tergempar-atau.html)
9. Tempoh pilihan raya yang berlaku tidak sampai separuh penggal menyebabkan Tuanku Sultan enggan membubarkan DUN. Apatah lagi jika diadakan pilihan raya lagi pun, apakah politik akan stabil atau terus berkocak jika keadaan masih sama dengan mana-mana parti mendapat lebihan dua atau tiga kerusi.
10. Dengan kata lain, Baginda mungkin melihat satu lagi pilihan raya baru belum tentu menjanjikan kestabilan politik di Perak jika keputusannya lebih kurang sahaja.

(short translated by JP as, YM Sultan refused to dissolve the DUN due to its an extremely short period just after the 3.08 election; Dissolution of DUN and snap election in state (Perak) will not guarantee a stability of politic if results (new) showing the same situation where there is only 2 or 3 seat in majority) ..

(2) MCA - Dr Chua Soi Lek said, (in his blog at http://drchua9.blogspot.com/2009/05/perak-political-drama-takes-turn.html)
BN can choose to appeal to the High Court ruling and this may then drag on effectively rendering the Pakatan state government ineffective.

Personally, I feel that a fresh state election will be the best way to resolve this stalemate. Let the rakyat decides and once for all, we resolve this problem, which is not doing anybody any good.

(3) PGRM - Dr. Hsu Dar Ren stated, (in his blog at http://hsudarren.wordpress.com/2009/05/12/press-statements-on-perak/)
1. As a Central Committee member of Parti Gerakan Rakyat Malaysia, I strongly urge the Barisan Nasional as well as the Pakatan leadership to come together for an understanding to jointly seek the permission of the ruler to dissolve the Perak State Assembly and seek a fresh State Election, which in my view is the only sensible solution to the problem.

2. Enough farce has been played and enough damage has been done to the nation. In the interest of the people of Perak in specific and Malaysia in general, it is no longer a matter of who is right and who is wrong. The decision of who should form the rightful government should no longer be decided in courts , but rather it should be decided by the people of Perak themselves, going by the very basic principle of democracy.

3. I humbly appeal to both sides to go back to democratic principles and let common sense prevail rather than trying to hold on to power and lose the support of the people.

(4) PAS - Haji Husam bin Haji Musa urged, (in his blog at http://cetusan-hati.blogspot.com/2009/05/peluang-sultan-perak-muncul-terhormat.html)
Keputusan apa pun oleh Mahkamah Tinggi memang boleh dirayu. Tetapi, jika bagi orang awam biasa sekalipun boleh mengerti bahawa pemecatan Nizar adalah tidak sah, dan itu telah pun diputuskan oleh Mahkamah Tinggi, Najib sepatutnya tidak lagi menggunakan saluran undang-undang untuk menyelesaikan krisis Perak yang beliau sendiri mulakan.

Keberanian menerima realiti dan keberanian menyelesaikan kemelut ini mengikut saluran politik adalah segala-galanya. Jika rayuan itu nanti masih memihak kepada Nizar, Najib dan UMNO akan menanggung malu yang lebih besar. Jika keputusan itu atas apa sebab pun memihak kepada BN, rasa euphoria rakyat atas bebasnya kehakiman negara ini kembali menjadi negatif.

Jika Najib berani bertindak bersama PR untuk memujuk Sultan Perak memperkenankan pembubaran DUN, BN mendapat dua markah. Markah atas bebasnya kehakiman di bawah pentadbiran Najib dan point yang kedua, kerana berani mencari jalan penyelesaian kepada krisis atas prinsip kembalikan kuasa penentuan kepada rakyat.
.....

Peluang institusi Diraja Perak keluar dari kemelut ini dengan tahap imej yang lebih tinggi adalah terbuka luas. Bubarkan saja DUN Perak dan biarkan rakyat memutuskan penghakiman mereka.
Bagi PAS dan PR, bukan bermakna pembubaran itu akan menguntungkan mereka. Rakyat Perak mungkin mengundi tidak seperti yang PR harapkan. Apa pun, pembubaran DUN tetap langkah terpuji yang membuktikan PAS dan PR adalah pemain demokrasi yang jujur dan pruden serta berani meletakkan rakyat di tempat teratas. Kuasa bukan segala-galanya tetapi prinsip-prinsip utama lebih didahulukan.
(translated in short, - by JP as BN have the rights to appeal the court rules but if the result goes in favour to them later, its sounded like the court might be bias. Worst still if the appeal rules that in favour to Mohd Nizar, again this should created more humiliating to BN !
the better way is to dissolve the DUN and if the YM Regent consent to dissolve it, then this should leave the Regent out of the politic-crash and earns them (the Regent) respects.)

(5) a well-known blogger - Uncle Bernard Khoo slammed the BN, (in his blog at http://zorro-zorro-unmasked.blogspot.com/2009/05/what-now-your-highness.html)
The BN chicanery had brought the Royal House into a compromised position.

People have vented their anger and are being charged for treason.

The people voiced it our clearly and loudly at Bukit Gantang.

The High Court was decisive.

and many more urging and urging ... #DISSOLVE the DUN Perak, please#
(except a small piece of big sum still stubborn with their points of view to hold)
cut lost .... cut lost ~

Which newsmedia Chua Soi Lek slam On ?

Is it Malaysiakini, The Star or New Strait Times?
..*NOTE: Malaysiakini - A Pro Anwarism Internet News Media
..*NOTE: The Star - A Pro MCA Newspaper
..*NOTE: New Strait Times - A Pro BN Newspaper
(based on Malaysia party 's own analytical)

16th February Malaysiaparty 's [NOW] News of Week
(picked from Dr.Chua Soi Lek blog) :
http://drchua9.blogspot.com/2009/02/press-freedom.html

Press Freedom/ 新闻自由
Posted by Datuk Seri Dr. Chua Soi Lek on Thursday, February 12, 2009 at 5:19pm

I am not so naïve to believe that there is absolute press freedom, more so in a multiracial country, where restrain by the press is essential to maintain harmony.

Off late, I have received a lot of comments by people that a leading English newspaper has been giving a lot of space including picture opportunity to some leaders of MCA.

There are days when a particular leader occupies 2 to 3 pages of the newspaper.

Comments made by this particular leader are almost the same, which is “always very sensitive about the needs of the rakyat”. This is good if it is true and not just a political rhetoric.

A lot of people also commented that there is total blackout about me in the same newspaper. My reply was I am not surprised.

I have been travelling and officiating a number of functions and make pertinent comments about current events. To be fair, so far the Chinese press carried my news; but there is none in this particular newspaper.

To the English speaking MCA members, I am probably sleeping since they don’t read about me at all for the last 1½ month.

However, I told them if there is any adverse publicity about me, be sure it will be headline in this particular paper.

Papers have to be reliable and credible. The readers are discerning to fathom this. Only the editorials have loss touch with the people. Yet, these same paper editorials tell politicians not to loss touch with the rakyat.

This same newspaper in its leading comment about Najib adopt people first leadership style – said, “Leaders would always want to hear only good news but they could come from people with personal interest”.

Newspaper should present 2 sides to a coin.

If it only serves to trumpet a selected few and taking readers for granted, then the newspaper must be in denial.

Meanwhile, more and more readers are aware of the happenings in the editorial staffs of this particular newspaper. Good luck to them.
===========================================
possibility RELATED articles:
1. PROVEN ! Malaysiakini, a Pro-Anwar Website !! at
http://malaysiaparty.blogspot.com/2009/01/malaysiakini-influential-website.html

Echo of [dare to XO , dare to spit] Character Burst UP !

13th January Malaysiaparty 's pick of to-day
Exclusively by JP - [the 3rd PARTY]:


Following the hotpick of my last posting :
Ong, Where is your [dare to fuck, dare to spit] 敢怒敢言 Character all burst up by high Post, ya ? , I would like to share few more points of my view.

Five months ago when the MCA periodic party election, I posted an article 双面乌龟 (translated-"Two Faces Turtle") at ongteekeat.net -

where I strongly disappointed with his gang brought up the sex tape issue again, where this reflected he is a mankind of "said a kind but do another kind" !

The only reason why I felt strongly disappointed is we had a great hope onto him. For many years, he had managed his style of political approach well and given such "fighter for race" image which impressed us. We do hope that he is the one who is able to strongly protect our culture, language, religious; children school system and business environment from being swallowed up by the "Shark" !


But all this hope just burst up when he turned up to be another "Bastard" after he grab his ultimate power in his party and "awarded" a higher seat in the cabinet post.

Hopeless ..! Hopeless ...

Ong, Where is your [dare to fuck, dare to spit] 敢怒敢言 Character all burst up by high Post, ya ?

13th January Malaysiaparty 's pick of to-day (to be listed at Malaysiakini)
Exclusively by [JP-the 3rd PARTY]:

...Once upon a time, there was a mankind who was dare to speak out for unfairness and injustice and fight for his race.

After he'd mislead his supporter to hardcorely push him up to "Praying Table"(Cantonese - Seng Toi) as where he is now with his high post in his gang (party) and commissioner (cabinet) , he is totally shut his mouth off.

He is not supposed to be a man as we respected before as a "fighter" where his "dare to speak out" spirit gone nowhere !!

" A Liar! Bastard! Race Traitor !! "

(picked from Lim Kit Siang 's weblog) : malaysiakini top blogger
http://blog.limkitsiang.com/2009/01/13/dap-challenge-to-mca-%e2%80%93-kt-debate-on-%e2%80%9cwho-should-apologise-%e2%80%93-mca-or-dap%e2%80%9d/

DAP challenge to MCA – KT debate on “Who should apologise – MCA or DAP?”
posted on Tuesday, January 13th, 2009 at 13: 31.58

MCA Vice President and Health Minister, Datuk Liow Tiong Lai has said that the DAP should apologise to the Chinese voters in Kuala Terengganu for misleading them on PAS’ hudud issue.

How has DAP misled the Chinese voters in Kuala Terengganu when DAP had been consistent on the hudud issue?

It is the MCA which should apologise not only to Chinese voters in Kuala Terengganu and the country but to all Malaysian voters for its inconsistency and hypocrisy in saying one thing but doing another - for instance, in the MCA support for the UMNO declaration started by Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad on Sept. 29, 2001 that “Malaysia is an Islamic State”!

In the past eight years, the MCA leadership has neither retracted its support for the “929 Declaration” that “Malaysia is an Islamic State” nor demanded that the UMNO leadership retract the “929 Declaration”.

As the MCA leadership has raised the issue of “apology”, DAP challenges MCA to a debate in Kuala Terengganu on “Who should apologise – MCA or DAP?”

Is the MCA President, Datuk Seri Ong Tee Kiat prepared to lead a MCA team to a public debate on this subject in Kuala Terengganu before the by-election on Saturday – whether on Thursday or Friday?

If Ong was NOT aimed to Chua; then he is leading his Party back to Deaf and Dumb style !!

12th January Malaysiaparty 's [NOW] News of Week
(picked from Malaysiakini.com) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/96081

MCA chief denies gag order on his deputy
Lee Way Loon Jan 8, 09 7:47pm
MCA president Ong Tee Keat today rejected claims that he had imposed a gag order on party leaders, specifically various bureau chiefs, by issuing a directive for all press statements to be endorsed by the presidential council before they are issued.
*Not aimed at anyone, including Chua
*Non-intervention at the Star

比黄家定更糟的哑巴政治领导! 越寄于厚望, 越令人失望!!

12th January Malaysiaparty 's [NOW] News of Week
(picked from Malaysiakini.com) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/95874

1月12日 党讯精選
(转摘自《当今大马》 Malaysiakini ) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/95874

发文告前需先获会长理事会同意
马华当权派对蔡细历下封嘴令?
1月6日 下午1点11分

据悉上周首次举行的马华会长理事会已通过一项议决，规定马华各局主任在对外发表任何针对政府的政策，尤其是触及其他国阵成员党部长的文告前，必须先征求会长理事会的同意。

此举被普遍视为是马华当权派，欲针对马华署理总会长兼政府政策监督局主任蔡细历所下的一道“封嘴令”。

蔡细历近期频频以政策监督局主任的身份召开记者会，针对政府的政策进行褒贬，并专注炮打目前由马华副总会长廖中莱所担任部长的卫生部。

蔡细历日前第五度召开记者会时，曾经批评卫生部在宣传骨痛热症的课题上执行不力，并获得行动党国会领袖林吉祥的附和。

蔡细历本身也是前任卫生部长，他是在爆发性爱光碟丑闻后，于去年1月宣布辞去卫生部长的官职及党职。

不过蔡细历却事隔10月后的马华党选中传奇性地卷土重来，成功击败黄家泉赢得署理总会长一职。唯他的关系与赢得马华总会长翁诗杰却陷入低谷，被蔡细历本身喻为“零度温暖”。

蔡细历在出炉的各州联委会名单中名落孙山，仅获受委为政策监督局主任。

担忧被误以为是马华立场

消息透露，马华会长理事会是基于有关的看法或批评，常常会被误以为该党的立场，才会改而采取较为小心翼翼的立场。

此外，会长理事会也促请各局主任，在发表任何触及争议性的课题或政府政策的看法时，须先查清楚真相，甚至进行民意调查，勿贸然作出总结。

禁令属马华历史上第一遭

对于这项突如其来的决定，蔡细历的支持者显然义愤难平，一名局成员就抨击说，类似的禁令在马华历史上可说是第一遭。

“若总会长对其局主任没有信心，那么为何一开始仍委任他（蔡细历）？总会长倒不如直接命令局主任听令于他。”

质疑理事会的开会频密度

蔡派支持者也质疑这项决定的可行性，因为虽然过去马华会长理事会在前任总会长时期频密召开，几乎是每个星期都召开，但自从翁诗杰上任之后，却拖延至本月2日才召开首次的会议。

违敢怒路线重蹈哑巴政治?

另一些党内人士则担忧，此举如同违背翁诗杰上任时信誓旦旦的“敢怒敢言”的路线，形同恢复黄家定时代备受质疑的“哑巴政治文化”。

但是也有赞同者，认同此举旨在遏制蔡细历继续公开对马华部长们，进行含有政治动机的“机会主义式”批评，并非重蹈过去的旧弊端。

A Party with its future DARKER than Gerakan - if they keep on like that !!

05th January Malaysiaparty 's [NOW] News of Week
(picked from themalaysianinsider.com) :
http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/index.php/malaysia/14777-anwar-eyes-east-malaysia-despite-pacts-troubles

First MCA presidential council meeting today amid Tee Keat-Soi Lek spat

By Shannon Teoh

KUALA LUMPUR, Jan 2 — The MCA will have its first presidential council meeting since party polls last October as the rift between the party's top two leaders threatens to split the beleaguered Barisan Nasional component member again.

When the previous party leadership chose to retire following the MCA's poor showing in last March's general election, it was suppose to pave the way for major reforms and reconcile rival factions.

But since party delegates voted in Datuk Seri Ong Tee Keat as president and Datuk Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek as his deputy, it has created a new rivalry and caused a major split in the party.

The top two leaders have not even met each other since attending the new central committee meeting in November.

The two leaders have, however, been having a very public spat with each other, and today's presidential council meeting is set to be fiery.

By convention, the presidential council is usually formed soon after the first central committee meeting, which itself took a longer-than-usual three weeks to be called.

Under previous leaderships, the presidential council usually met weekly before Cabinet meetings so as to make a clear and concerted party stand on issues.

The council is made up of the president, his deputy, the vice-presidents and other central committee members chosen by him.

But even members of the central committee told The Malaysian Insider that they had no idea who has actually been appointed.

While none of these things are in breach of the party constitution or regulations, they have gone against the grain and members are confused as to why Tee Keat has done things contrary to tradition.

The lack of direction from the leadership, along with what is now appearing to be an all-out war between the top two has left members low on morale and uncertain over the party's future.

Tee Keat and Dr Chua had agreed to set aside differences in a cordial meeting soon after the elections, but there has been little follow through on that.

The president's decision not to appoint Dr Chua as disciplinary chief or liaison chief for any state coincided with a public spat over whether the president would recommend a return to the Cabinet for his deputy.

Dr Chua had resigned as Health Minister after being exposed in a sex scandal last January.

A year on from that, Dr Chua is still in the limelight on the back of his involvement in the roiling debate over Ketuanan Melayu, or Malay Supremacy, and most recently clarifying that he had technically not resigned as MP for Labis despite promising to do so, as in his muddled state of mind, he neglected to send a letter to the Dewan Rakyat Speaker.

The recently established MCA Integrity Watch Group has called on him to resign again from his post, saying that he lied to the then MCA president, the prime minister and the public.

Earlier, it also called him a "disgrace and liability to the party since we members cannot even mention that we are from MCA without inviting a snigger from others," over his insistence on making a political comeback despite the sex scandal.

The legal bureau of Selangor MCA has also followed suit, criticising his lack of integrity.

With Tee Keat having a strong power base in the state, it is understood that he is trying to slow down Dr Chua's momentum via proxy groups.

"The watch group said it would not dwell on past issues, so why did it criticise Dr Chua over the scandal? If anything, Ong's recent press conference on the RM4.6 billion Port Klang Free Zone debacle left many questions unanswered," one grassroots leader told The Malaysian Insider.

On the other hand, Tee Keat has been low-key as his duties as Transport Minister has seen him jetsetting from one country to another.

Some members have noticed that Dr Chua has been the one taking up issues.

"As bureau chief of government policy monitoring, he has brought up more issues than the president has," a divisional leader said.

There is also general bemusement that when Tee Keat was elected president, he talked about change and work starting immediately.

But if anything, the pace of progress has been slow, and the phrase "I do not know what is going on" is often repeated among the grassroots.

The spat between Tee Keat and Dr Chua is reminiscent of the feud between then president Tun Dr Ling Liong Sik and his deputy Tan Sri Lim Ah Lek which led to both being made to resign in 2003 as part of a "peace plan" formulated by former Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad.

From the pool of four vice-presidents, the double resignation led to Datuk Seri Ong Ka Ting and Tan Sri Chan Kong Choy replacing the duo ahead of the more senior Datuk Seri Dr Fong Chan Onn and Datuk Chua Jui Meng.

Ka Ting and Chan also did not see eye-to-eye on matters and similarly both stepped down at this year's party polls after the poor showing in the March 8 general election.

While having a confrontational top two is not new to the party, MCA is now at a crossroads after March 8 and the Chinese clearly supporting the opposition parties.

Unsurprisingly, when asked what the future holds for the party if things continue along these lines, members were not optimistic.

Finished, irrelevant, tah pao or bungkus (Cantonese and Bahasa Malaysia slang meaning to fold and dissolve) or becoming the next Gerakan — a fellow Chinese-majority BN component that was nearly wiped out on March 8 — were the replies.

蔡添强并非对“卡巴星的言论“不敬” ! 周美芬该抨的不敢講; 卻对敵党的内部矛盾滔滔不绝 !!

30th December Malaysiaparty 's [NOW] News of Week
(picked from Malaysiakini.com) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/95422

12月30日 党讯精選
(转摘自《当今大马》 Malaysiakini ) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/95422

辩护公正党回教课题立场鲜明
林秀凌：各造无须再大做文章
12月24日 傍晚6点13分
针对回教党副主席胡桑慕沙日前发表落实回教刑事法的言论，公正党澄清该党宣传主任蔡添强已履行他身为党全国宣传主任职责，就事论事代表公正党阐明该党在此课题上的立场。

人民公正党中央宣传局媒体协调主任林秀凌指出，蔡添强并非对“行动党主席卡巴星的言论“不敬”，身为民联主要领导之一，卡巴星和其他领导有同等的责任澄清公众对民联的疑惑。

她澄清，蔡添强指“没有必要凡事都要安华亲自回应”，意指任何一个民联成员党的领导，可在已经达致共识的政策和议题上发言，而蔡氏身为公正党全国宣传主任，必然有责任代表党和民联阐明立场。

她说，人民公正党对回教国、回教刑事法、新经济政策等课题，已多次发表鲜明立场。民联也已联邦民主宪法为我们斗争的共识，此事无须多次重提。

与国阵一言堂模式不同

林秀凌今天也发表文告抨击马华全国妇女组主席周美芬不敢批判巫统的霸权，更不敢抗议巫统漠视国阵成员党的意愿，强行种族主义的政策，反而在此事件上大做文章，这也显示出周氏对民联的执政纲领，以及与国阵截然不同的运作一窍不通。

“民联由人民公正党、民主行动党和回教党联合组成，各党领导平起平坐，在任何课题和政策上有分歧，大可直接和党领袖反映立场和交流；民联秉持民主开放的政治文化，任何课题都可以自由讨论，各党都可以商讨不同的党议程。”

她继称，民联三党领导必须在民联会议上达成共识后，才可对外宣布立场或看法，任何成员党要做出任何改变之前，也必须获得民联认同，再由民联领袖安华作出公布。

“这与巫统主导的国阵截然不同。周美芬也许认同巫统的霸权及一言堂文化，我们实在无法苟同。”

民联纲领没纳入刑事法

林秀凌也是公正党全国青年团中委，她认为，无论如何回教党领袖发表有关回教刑事法的言论，不是什么新鲜课题，不过民联的政治纲领并没有将之纳入其中。

“民联成立于今年4月1日，是以7项大原则作为执政纲领，即维护联邦宪法精神、确保宗教与文化自由、透明化行政机制、建立公正司法制度、推行全民经济议程、保障媒体和资讯自由、塑造民主社会。”
与国阵一言堂模式不同
民联纲领没纳入刑事法
(above picked from http://malaysiakini.com/news/95422)

庆幸916失败告终, 否则大马已成回教刑事法的回教国 ! ! !

30th December Malaysiaparty 's [NOW] News of Week
(picked from Malaysiakini.com) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/95246

12月30日 党讯精選
(转摘自《当今大马》 Malaysiakini ) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/95246

回教党副主席胡桑慕沙日前所提出的“若民联执政中央就会全面实施回教法”，已经引起极大的回响，甚至可能成为下个月举行的瓜拉登嘉楼补选中，其中一个热门的竞选课题。

民主行动党国会领袖林吉祥今日发表声明，除了强调推行回教刑事法并不是民联政策之外，并敦促胡山澄清其言论，否则将令华裔选民感到不安。

行动党坚持世俗国立场不变

林吉祥也是怡保东区国会议员，他表示，若未加以澄清，胡桑的言论不仅将让在1月17日瓜拉登嘉楼的11%华裔选民感到不安，同时将引起其他登嘉楼州及全国马来人及非马来人更大的不安与反感。

“实行回教刑事法不是民联的政策，胡桑应澄清他实际上说了些什么。”

“民主行动党坚持我们的先辈们，在国家于51年前独立时所达致的社会契约中同意世俗立国的立场，而这个立场由始至终不变。”

李伟杰指责回教党违反宣言

另一边厢，马华中央党部发言人李伟杰对民联的人民主权沦为“回教刑事法”感到非常失望，更对这种欺骗人民的政治手段感到遗憾。

他说，日前回教党副主席胡桑慕沙所提出的“若民联执政中央就会全面实施回教法”，已经全面违反该党福利国的宣言，形如背叛选民。

也是马华新闻局主任的李伟杰指出，在308大选前，回教党为了捞取开明的巫裔选民及非巫裔的选票，堂皇地推出了福利国的宣言。

“当时公正党与行动党全力支持回教党，更在308之后组成民联，共同执政5州。数月前民联尝试要拉拢国阵国会议员跳槽，以夺取中央政权，不过最后以失败告终。”

“马华庆幸国阵议员站稳立场，没有轻信安华的花招。如果当初真的出现变天，可能大马现在已经成为实行回教刑事法的回教国。”

促民联书面保证不实行回教国

他说，为了安抚人民因回教国议题而引起的紧张情绪，马华促请民联应效仿之前三党签署的协议，白纸黑字地做出以下的书面保证：

1）根据宪法，马来西亚的政体是君主立宪制，并通过民选的议会制度选出国家领导人，任何人都不许通过回教国的实行，尝试颠覆宪法；

2）在联邦宪法之下，回教只是大马官方宗教，人民也享有宗教自由，绝对不能通过回教刑事法剥夺各族人民的宗教自由。

他说，公正党与行动党的国会议席占有59席，远远超过只有23席的回教党。若这两党无法说服回教党放弃成立回教国的野心，并保证大马不会沦为回教国，那么两党就应该探讨退出民联或开除回教党。
行动党坚持世俗国立场不变
李伟杰指责回教党违反宣言
促民联书面保证不推回教国
(above picked from http://malaysiakini.com/news/95246)

安华甚么什么未来首相人选, 更应该去看沟渠 ! ! !

27th December Malaysiaparty 's [SPot] Special Report
(picked from Malaysiakini.com) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/95387

12月27日 专题报导
(转摘自《当今大马》 Malaysiakini ) : hhttp://malaysiakini.com/news/95387

一句没必要凡事要安华回应惹祸
马华行动党罕见联手炮轰蔡添强
12月24日 下午1点22分

公正党宣传主任蔡添强（左图）反驳行动党主席卡巴星，声称国会反对党领袖兼公正党实权领袖安华没有必要回应回教党副主席胡桑慕沙所发表的落实回教刑事法言论的一席话惹祸，罕见地招致马华及行动党的联手炮轰。

根据报道，蔡添强是在昨日驳斥卡巴星要求安华回应胡桑慕沙发表若民联执政中央政府必定落实回教刑事法的言论，并表示若卡巴星有所不满，可直接约见胡桑慕沙本人或回教党领袖，没有必要凡事都要安华亲自回应。

蔡添强也说，安华作为未来首相人选，不可能小至街道清洁问题、禁酒等课题都要回应。而他身为公正党的宣传主任，已经代表公正党与民联的立场，即维护联邦宪法的精神，而回教党要做出任何改变之前，必须获得民联认同。

他也指出，既然胡桑已经澄清，回教党不会再没有咨询友党的情况下，冒然实施回教法，再加上这仅是胡桑在辩论时所提出的个人观点，不代表回教党的立场，所以卡巴星不应该在这课题上争执不休。

潘俭伟遗憾对卡巴星不敬

民主行动党全国宣传秘书兼灵北区国会议员潘俭伟（昨图）则发表文告，对蔡添强指行动党全国主席卡巴星“没必要凡事要安华回应”的言论感到非常遗憾，并认为蔡添强的言论是对一个资深领袖的不敬。

潘俭伟指出，卡巴星（右图）要求公正党实权领袖安华针对回教党副主席胡桑慕沙挑起“民联将实行回教刑事法”的言论做出回应并无任何不妥。因为安华除了是公正党的最高领袖外，他也是民联三党的核心人物之一，安华对回教刑事法的立场将深深影响人民对民联的看法。

潘俭伟也不认同蔡添强指“安华是未来的首相人选，就不可能小至街道清洁问题、禁酒课题都要他亲自回应”的言论。因为回教刑事法并不是地方民生问题，而是关系到国家的宪法精神和民联三党的结盟共识，由安华亲自回应此课题才能显得公正党是严正看待任何挑战我国宪法精神的言论。

潘俭伟也重申行动党坚决反对在我国实行回教刑事法，因为我国自建国以来就已经在宪法上阐明马来西亚是一个世俗民主国。他说，行动党对任何人尝试挑战宪法，要在我国落实回教刑事法都不会给予妥协。

安华立场是民联最终立场

另一方面，马华全国妇女组主席周美芬（右图）也力促安华必须针对胡桑的回教法言论表态，以向全体人民清楚说明该党及民联对回教法的立场和原则。

她说，胡桑在日前的一场辩论中，信誓旦旦的承诺该党将在执掌中央政权后，全面推行回教刑事法，已经引起非回教徒的疑虑。

“回教党执意要在马来西亚推行回教法，是一种完全漠视我国多元种族、多元宗教国情的狭隘态度，更是对我国联邦宪法的世俗精神的一种严重藐视。”

周美芬强调，安华作为在公正党中掌握最高权力的实权领袖，以及作为民联的最高领袖，如果不在回教党要推行回教法的课题上做出任何明确的交待或看法，是完全说不过去的。

“更何况，行动党秘书长林冠英以及主席卡巴星已经先后要求安华针对有关课题发言，显示安华的立场才是民联的最终立场。”

认同胡桑抑或边缘行动党？

“除非林冠英和卡巴星在民联的地位可有可无，否则安华应该尊重两位同僚的意愿，立即对胡桑的言论表态。如果安华继续保持沉默，那就有两种可能：一、他默认胡桑的言论，即民联一旦执掌中央将推行回教法；二、行动党在所谓平起平坐的民联里被公正党及回教党边缘化，以致其秘书长和主席的要求都无法获得任何满足或回应。”

她也认为蔡添强在回应卡巴星时表示“安华作为未来首相人选，不可能小至街道清洁问题、禁酒等课题都要回应”，是非常荒谬的说辞。

周美芬指出，推行回教法是一项事关国体、宪政、社会形态以及人民切身生活的重大课题，蔡添强将有关问题比喻为“街道清洁问题”，简直是太儿戏了。

“蔡氏即使要为安华推脱责任，也应该提出更具说服力的理由，而不是以如此轻蔑的态度去敷衍其民联同僚和广大人民。
(above picked from http://malaysiakini.com/news/95387)

[Dr Chua] Malaysia Finanacial overview, and Advice to UMNO

21st December Malaysiaparty 's [NOW] News of Week
(picked from Dr.Chua Soi Lek blog) :
http://drchua9.blogspot.com/2008/12/blog-post_16.html

Installation Dinner of MCA Segambut Division in Tropicana
Posted by Datuk Seri Dr. Chua Soi Lek (Tuesday, December 16, 2008) at 5:45pm

I’ve attended the Segambut MCA Installation dinner 2 nights ago. I said that 2009 could be a very tough year for Malaysia, especially on the aspect of economy and politics.
malaysiakini to post this ==>
On the economy front, the U.S. financial crisis has become a global problem, affecting a lot of countries including Malaysia.

Malaysia is very dependent on trade, export of manufacture goods and primary commodities. Hence, all sectors will be affected. Bank Negara is optimistic that we can achieve 5% growth in Malaysia, which is quite commendable in view of many countries go into recession.

Next year, we predicted to achieve 3% growth. Going into 2010, it will be anybody’s guess.

It is obvious that we are unable to achieve an economic growth of 6% per year under the 9th Malaysia Plan. As rightly pointed out by Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohammed, this will definitely affect the 2020 vision.


Oil contributes about 40% of the country’s revenue. The 2009 budget is based on USD120 per barrel. Today, oil is trading at less than USD50 per barrel. Hence, our national revenue will be badly affected in 2009. However, the 2010 country’s revenue may be even worse than 2009 if the country’s primary commodity and oil remain depressed.

The economy slowdown will definitely cause reduction of new jobs (there are about 200, 000 new jobs every year). There will be increase in retrenchment and unemployment rate will go up next year.

The MCA Government Policy Monitoring Bureau has said 3 weeks ago that government should come out with mechanism to monitor any retrenchment exercise. This is a good opportunity to reduce our dependency on foreign workers.

The training scheme announced by the government should be publicized ...

How the government handles the downturn can make or breaks the government. This will be the Achilles heel to test the BN leadership, especially the Deputy Prime Minister.


People want the government to:

1) Reduce the burden and suffering of rakyat, especially the poor in view of inflation;

2) Reduce the cost of doing business

3) Help all sectors affected by economic downturn

4) Continue to strengthen the competitiveness of Malaysia economy, which is a very open system.


Malaysia is too dependent on trade and investment. Hence, it is important to continue to liberalize investment climate and ensure a friendly economy business environment. Hence, there is the need to reduce bureaucracy. This is very important in order to continue to enjoy economic growth despite the slowdown.

I talked about UMNO wakil rakyat, both Parliament and State Assemblyman who hardly visit Chinese area after the election and did not give peruntukan to them. As a result, this leads to disillusion.

Hence, they find that there is no difference, at least at the local level to vote for PAS. When Chinese vote for PAS, it is not an endorsement of PAS agenda but rather a protest vote.

Therefore, it is important that UMNO leaders at all levels must engage with non-Malays. This makes sense since the President and Deputy President become Prime Minister and Deputy Prime Minister and not just leaders for Malays and UMNO.

In the same way, MCA should not talk all about Chinese problems. It should have a more multiracial approach towards problem solving. We can be a Chinese based party but with a more multiracial outlook. Ideally, Malaysia politicians should be issue centric and not ethno-centric.
(part of the above picked from http://drchua9.blogspot.com/2008/12/blog-post_16.html)

选举前耍戏之4 [私营化国家心脏中心IJN] 马华领功

21th December Malaysiaparty 's [SPot] Special Report
(picked from Malaysiakini.com) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/95171

12月21日 专题报导
(转摘自《当今大马》 Malaysiakini ) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/95171

内阁搁置国家心脏中心私营化
李伟杰称马华部长及同僚功劳
12月19日 傍晚5点56分
马华中央党部发言人李伟杰表示，经过马华部长们及若干同僚的共同努力之下，内阁终于俯顺民意，作出搁置国家心脏中心被森那美集团收购的决定，马华对此感到欣慰。

他说，马华公会对私营化公司的立场是，任何企业，尤其是国家关联公司（GLC），都必须肩负和推广企业社会责任（Corporate Social Responsibility，CSR），以维护广大人民的福利和利益，而不是以盈利为终极目的。

因此，无论国家心脏中心最终私营化与否，其成立宗旨都不应改变，即照顾病人与社会大众的健康和利益。

“马华认为，政府应在全国各地增加医疗拨款，增建更多类似的心脏中心，并培养更多的心脏科医师。既然国家心脏中心最近的营运都有盈余，这些盈利都应该拿来回馈社会以造福更多的穷苦人士。”

指森那美“坐享其成”之嫌

他继称，马华强调，森那美集团要收购国家心脏中心的单方面做法有“坐享其成”之嫌。

他说，众所周知，国家心脏中心是世界知名的医疗中心，拥有世界级的软硬体设备，如此杰出的成就是中心里的医疗团队默默耕耘打拼起来的。但是，森那美集团的做法，难免会被人非议为“瘦田没人耕，耕开有人争”。

“森那美集团应效法国外的大企业重新设立新的医疗中心的做法，如台湾王永庆的台塑集团创立的长庚医院享誉台海两岸，使该企业回馈社会的公益形象深入民心。”

“森那美集团与其收购国营和国家企业、扩大本地投资领域，不如自食其力和放眼世界，不要只有满足于当“甘榜冠军”的狭隘视野，只以收购现成的国家心脏中心为荣。”

促政府慎重处理私营化计划

他表示，马华强调推动企业社会责任是全球大势所趋，鉴于全球化的脆弱性和国际间越拉越大的差距，以及财富的分配不公和不平等，特别是某些企业不合理的发展对世界安全和生态环境带来巨大威胁，联合国已向国际商界领袖提出了挑战，那就是呼吁企业约束自己自私的牟利行为，并担负起更多的社会责任。

“马华认为，在金融海啸和经济不景气即将冲击马来西亚的时刻，政府应该慎重处理私营化计划，拟定一套完善、透明的方案，以免以往一些引人诟病、问题多多的私营化计划再度发生。”

“马华也促请其它经营私营化计划的企业，能加强推广企业社会责任，在协助国家减少财政负担之余，也不会加重人民的支出和开销。
(above picked from http://malaysiakini.com/news/95171)

选举前耍戏之3 [私营化国家心脏中心IJN] 计划搁置

21th December Malaysiaparty 's [SPot] Special Report
(picked from Malaysiakini.com) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/95154

12月21日 专题报导
(转摘自《当今大马》 Malaysiakini ) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/95154

国家心脏中心私营化急转弯
内阁今日议决暂时搁置计划
李伟伦 | 12月19日 下午3点56分
森那美收购国家心脏中心的消息传出后引起沸沸扬扬，事情今日突然出现180度急转弯，内阁今日议决，暂时搁置这项私营化计划。

马华总会长兼交通部长翁诗杰今午在其部门举行新闻发布会，做出这项宣布。

翁诗杰：不能加重病黎负担

他指出，内阁在12月5日的会议上，曾经讨论是否要私营化，当时马华坚持立场，不能够给病黎沉重负担。

“马华部长在2周前的内阁会议上，已表示要认真和严正地看待，私营化为病黎所带来的沉重负担。”

至于国家心脏中心私营化计划暂搁至何时，翁诗杰表示，这将待副首相纳吉做出进一步宣布。

纳吉今午开新闻发布会宣布

也是财政部长的纳吉，已经在今日傍晚5点半於其部门举行新闻发布会，正式作出宣布。

纳吉昨日表示，政府原则上不反对官联公司森那美，收购和控制国家心脏中心。

不过，马华署理总会长蔡细历却昨日下午召开记者会，促请政府不要私营化国家心脏中心，因为此事或多或少将影响到国阵政府在人民心目中的形象。

并非越俎代庖插手其他部门

翁诗杰今日强调，本身此次召开记者会，宣布国家心脏中心的事宜，是以马华总会长身份发言，而非越俎代庖，管理其他部门的公务。

他意有所指地说：“马华其实早在5日已提出此事，不是在今天才有人说如此这般，这是与事实不符的。”

“这叫做马华部长把关，什么叫做把关？就是你当机立断，有没有基于纾解民困的原则。”

指“党内一些人”混淆视听

他表示，本身不希望“党内一些人”混淆视听，因为这没有必要。

询及蔡细历昨日的言论，是否反映马华领袖在此事沟通失调时，翁诗杰加以否认，并强调做好本分的重要性。

“我们说过部长本身，必须要先办好自己份内的责任。所谓做好本分，并不是采取一种捡现成的心理，那不是我们的文化。”

至于为何在5日的内阁会议后，马华没在此事表明立场，翁诗杰解释，那是因为他在之后就出国公干，马华并没就此事召开任何的中委会和会长理事会。

医生联署声明不当代罪羔羊

纳吉在昨日宣布，政府原则上不反对官联公司森那美收购国家心脏中心，引起激烈反弹。反对党纷纷炮轰政府允许国家心脏中心私营化，将加重病黎的负担。

就连在国家心脏中心服务的医生今日也发表一份联署声明，不想在私营化计划中变成“代罪羔羊”。

33名国家心脏中心的医药人员在声明中表示满意现状，并认为私营化并不能够解决他们要求更优渥薪金的要求。

他们强调，这项私营化计划不应该被视为是，解决他们要求起薪的做法。

他们强调，医药人员完全没有涉及在这宗私营化计划的谈判。
(above picked from http://malaysiakini.com/news/95154)

为华社尊严，马华不可道歉！

15th December Malaysiaparty 's [NOW] News of Week
(picked from letter section at Malaysiakini.com) : http://www.malaysiakini.com/letters/94265

12月15日 党讯精選
(转摘自《当今大马-读者来函>>) : http://www.malaysiakini.com/letters/94265

为华社尊严，马华绝不能道歉！
忠诚待人 12月3日 下午4点59分

日前，一群披着印有爪夷文丝巾,自称是“马来青年大专毕业生联盟”（GGMM）的6名乌合之众，闯进马华总部来个兴师问罪，并提呈一封律师信给署理总会长，要求收回言论并做出道歉，更狮子开大口地索取高达200万令吉的赔偿金！

这个非法组织的代表表示，索取200万的赔偿金将全数捐给马来人及回教的基金。至于受提问为何提出索偿200的数额时，非法组织的代表莫哈末凯鲁解释说：“这是因为在独立时，200万名非马来人获得了马来西亚的公民权。”

一个从未听所说过的组织，大胆地挑起公民权课题，挑战非马来人在宪法上的公民权地位，并向200万名在独立时期得到公民权的非马来人进行罚款。用意到底是什么？

公民权并不是一方对于非马来人的施舍或怜悯，而是一种认同。非马来人对国家建设的努力与贡献大家是有目共睹的，并得到独立时政府的认同，所以取得了公民权。

在宪法上，非马来人的公民权地位是受到保障的，这是毋庸置疑的。

那只是一个非法小组织，并没有代表全民的资格。这个小组织竟然开出这种要求，试图挑起各族的不满与纷争，实在是居心叵测。

另一方面，这个小组织闯到马华总部来，还开出无理的要求，无疑是在向马华、华社作出挑衅，对华社的尊严和地位加以鄙视，对马华的党威加以践踏。肩负整个华社的尊严，马华应该绝不道歉。

我们忠于王室，我们都爱国。

支持马华署理总会长拿督斯里蔡细历不道歉的原则，因为他没有错。错的是歪曲言论的有心人，该道歉的是偏激，无事生非的“马来青年大专毕业生联盟”！
(above picked from http://www.malaysiakini.com/letters/94265)

[唱大戏] 阿都拉.人民进步党去留国阵.悉随尊便

15th December Malaysiaparty 's [NOW] News of Week
(picked from Malaysiakini.com) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/94592

12月15日 党讯精選
(转摘自《当今大马》 Malaysiakini ) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/94592

人民进步党去留国阵悉随尊便
阿都拉三度重申要赢瓜登补选
李伟伦 12月9日 傍晚7点25分
虽然人民进步党在日前党代表大会向国阵发出最后通牒，若不修改内安法令将会退出国阵；不过，首相阿都拉今日一口否决人民进步党的通牒，并表示若人民进步党想要退出国阵，悉随尊便。

阿都拉指出，政府没有修改内安法令的意愿，并表示若人民进步党因此退出国阵，这将是该党自己的选择。

“不，没有这个计划（修改内安法令）。如果这是他们的选择，我们可以做些什么？”

也是国阵主席的阿都拉，今午主持约长3个小时半的国阵最高理事会议后，针对进步党所发出的最后通牒，简短地作出回应。

卡维斯今日未出席会议

不过，人民进步党主席卡维斯并未出席今日的国阵最高理事会。

虽然数度致电，但是《当今大马》至截稿都无法联络上卡维斯做出回应。

慕鲁基亚：我哑口无言

不过，人民进步党青年团长兼首相署副部长慕鲁基亚受询时，却对首相的言论感到惊讶。

“我不知道该怎么说，我很惊讶，感到哑口无言。”

“但是我不认为首相意思是要我们离开，因为他是一个好人，不过有时候，能够做什么？”

没讨论慕克里兹的言论

另一方面，阿都拉表示，今日的国阵最高理事会议，并没讨论太多的敏感课题，包括巫青团长候选人慕克里兹所提出的废除华小及淡小，划一小学教育的争议性建议。

他透露，会议上虽然有讨论一些敏感课题，但不需要向记者详细列出相关课题。

他强调，国阵向来都秉持开放的态度，同时也是一个共享权力的政党联盟，因此没有所谓的敏感课题，不能够拿出来讨论。

不忧补选出现钟摆效应

询及坊间在近2天流传，指巫统3月的权力转移计划不能落实的疑虑，阿都拉指出，这没什么关系，反正类似的流言也尽是一派胡言。

针对即将在明年1月举行的瓜拉登嘉楼补选，阿都拉表示，国阵非常有信心能够保住这个国会议席，并三度重申，“我们要赢（We want to win）”来回应记者的询问，展现国阵捍卫这个国会议席的决心。

他说，国阵的胜利因素包括了拥有很好的支持，但仍需更努力地工作。

提到他是否担忧会出现“钟摆效应”，选民把票投给在野党时，阿都拉说：“不是现在。你不晓得选民会怎么‘摆’，选民拥有最后一分钟‘摆动’的习惯，可能摆向我们，又或者别人”。

国阵大会敲定明年2月

阿都拉也宣布建议已久的国阵大会，已敲定明年2月举行。不过究竟是举行1天或2天，就必须进行更进一步的讨论。

他说，国阵各大成员党，也必须在近期内召开本身的工作营，以获取基层和党员的看法。

政府探讨如何救济灾黎

另一方面，阿都拉说，国阵最高理事会对雪州淡江发生的夺命土崩，表示伤心和哀悼。

他表示，国阵最高理事会已同意执行，政府之前所做出的相关宣布，特别是不允许再在高地建屋。

至于政府将会对土崩灾黎做出何种救济，阿都拉说，这将交由政府去考虑。

细历笑称怕到不敢说话

今日的国阵最高理事会会议从下午3点开始，至傍晚6点半结束。值得一提的是，由于马华总会长翁诗杰身在国外，其副手蔡细历也暂代翁氏的位子，并坐在副首相纳吉的左侧。

近期因发表“否决马来主权论”的蔡细历，在阿都拉的记者会后，准备搭乘电梯离开时，受记者询及会议上有否提出任何意见时，只以开玩笑口吻说：“我都怕到不敢说话了”。
(above picked from http://malaysiakini.com/news/94592)

蔡细历炮轰黄家泉和沙比里

15th December Malaysiaparty 's [NOW] News of Week
(picked from Malaysiakini.com) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/94694

12月15日 党讯精選
(转摘自《当今大马》 Malaysiakini ) : http://malaysiakini.com/news/94694

土崩不应归咎购屋者及天灾
蔡细历炮轰沙比里和黄家泉
黄凌风 12月11日 下午2点37分
马华署理总会长蔡细历今日对新闻部长阿末沙比里与房屋地方政府部长黄家泉左右开弓，炮轰两人把国际山庄的土崩惨剧归咎于购屋者及天灾，却没有任何违规的发展商受对付。

也是马华政府政策监督局主任的蔡细历，今早在马华中央党部举行新闻发布会，以不点名的方式批评阿末沙比里所发表的“购屋者也需对土崩时间负责”的言论。

“这是不正确的，购物者好像你和我都不是专家，如果政府已经批准证明房屋安全入住，我们当然当作是没事。但是我们也希望购屋者比较谨慎小心，尤其是山坡的发展。”

阿末沙比里日前声称，每次发生灾难都不应该怪罪于政府，在这次的土崩事件，政府、发展商与购屋者都有责任。

出席今日新闻发布会的还包括其他政府政策监督局成员，即中委卢诚国、安邦区会主席刘锦明、瓜拉冷岳区会主席余金福和汤木。

土崩惨剧乃人为因素造成

至于黄家泉昨日声称国际山庄土崩事件没有出现任何人为疏忽，唯不排除是近日的天气因素所造成，蔡细历受询时并不认同有关说法。

“马来西亚很多人喜欢说是天灾或者天意。我认为这是不大对的......任何土崩是否可能是构造、建筑或维修所造成的问题。这些恐怕都是人为，大雨只是加剧人为制造的问题出现。”

“构造的问题可能会在20年后才出现的。”

不停上演“互相指责”闹剧

他坦言，我国几乎年年都发生土崩惨剧，但是却没有任何方面受到责罚，相关单位甚至还不停上演“相互责怪”的闹剧。

“往往土崩发生后，没有人负责任，有些人怪政府，有些人怪州政府，有一些怪地方政府。怪来怪去，每一次过后都是同样在演戏。”

“这些发展是需要通过很多专家证明安全没事才可以住，是否这些专家，从政府到私人界都必须负起一部分的责任？”

蔡细历指出，出事的淡江一带在过去15年来一共发生了13宗大型土崩惨剧，其中5宗涉及国际山庄。

为何至今没发展商被控告？

他批评，至今没有任何国际山庄的发展商因为违规，而遭到当局起诉上法庭。

他讽刺说，“换句话说，所有发展商都是非常好的，都是A等的”。

“每次发生土崩后谁来负责？没有任何人负责。”

蔡细历表示，事实上环境局已经制定了一套详细的山坡发展计划指南，其中清楚列明斜度超过35度的山坡不允许进行任何发展计划。

不过，他说，却有一些脑筋转得快的发展商砍平山坡土地，以便斜度只剩下15度，这样就能够进行发展计划。

地方议会缺专家监督工程

此外，蔡细历也表示，有关当局在批准山坡发展计划时，缺乏监督工作，往往导致土崩惨剧的发生。

他继称，由于负责批准发展计划的地方议会缺乏专才，导致地方议会被迫依赖其他部门；结果，在发展计划获得批准后，没有对工程进行监督，也没有在完工后进行维修工作。

他说，这次的土崩事实上给予政府一个机会，展现出政治意愿详细探讨及解决土崩问题，包括土崩究竟是因为构造、建筑还是维修问题所造成的。

目前不适讨论上议员人选

另一方面，针对马华中委李成材昨日病逝所留下的上议员空缺应由谁填补时，蔡细历不愿作出回应，并批评有关马来文报章记者不应在死者仍未入土为安，就提出这种问题。

“我们都是凡人，人家都还未入土为安，我们就来讨论这种事情。你们比我们更紧张。人家会说你们没有良心，他的家族看了会很生气的。”

“这就好像你还没被裁员，他们就在讨论由谁来取代你了。这是一样的。我知道你们也是在做工，但是也有一些东西不该问的。”
(above picked from http://malaysiakini.com/news/94694)

Prelude of MCA Internal Conflict episod 7 马华 . 笼里鸡 前奏7

23rd November Malaysiaparty 's [NOW] News of Week
(picked from themalaysianinsider.com) :
http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/index.php/malaysia/12352-wounds-open-up-again-in-mca

Wounds open up again in MCA
By Leslie Lau
Consultant Editor

KUALA LUMPUR, Nov 13 – Just weeks after its party elections, the gloves appear to have come off as MCA president Datuk Seri Ong Tee Keat and his rivals have started engaging in another battle for control over the beleaguered party.

Tee Keat came out swinging today in defending his choices for the party's new leadership line-up, saying his decisions were not meant to please a “certain group of persons.”

He also said that in any political party there could only be one person at the helm, in what was a pointed reference to deputy president Datuk Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek, who has been at odds with him since the party election campaign period.

“Did you see Annette Lu giving out commands when Chen Shui Bian was the president of Taiwan? The same goes for Ma Ying-jeou, you will not see Vincent Siew standing out and making comments. And I am quite sure you don't see PKR's Syed Husin Ali giving out orders,” he told the mass-selling Sin Chew Daily in an exclusive interview published today.

Announcing key leadership posts on Tuesday, he sidelined Dr Chua from any significant responsibilities in the party.

In response, Dr Chua said yesterday that he wanted to apologise to party members because “it is not that I do not want to work for MCA but I have been given limited space by the president.”

Tee Keat also denied today that his leadership line-up was meant to oust leaders associated with former president Ong Ka Ting's Team A faction.

“Everyone has a right to making their own interpretations,” he told the newspaper.

“As for the various comments, I will treat them as if I were reading the entertainment news. It will be like one extra entertainment page in the newspapers.”

Tee Keat also dismissed as “strange” the roiling speculation that former deputy president Tan Sri Chan Kong Choy who was part of the party's Team B faction was behind the slew of unexpected appointments to key posts.

On Tuesday, Tee Keat removed Datuk Ong Ka Chuan, who is Ka Ting's brother, as secretary-general, replacing him with the relatively unknown Datuk Wong Foon Meng, who is together with the new treasurer Tan Sri Tee Hock Seng, said to be close to Chan.

Known as the party's so-called “Lone Ranger,” the party president appears to be fighting on many fronts against a slew of forces aligned against him.

While there are high expectations among MCA members for him to help the party close ranks, his behavior and demeanour so far has been of a leader under siege.

While the party has been wracked by severe divisions into two rival Team A and Team B factions previously, it now appears to be fragmented into many more blocs.

Asked why certain leaders were left out of key positions in the party, he would only say that “you will understand me later.”

He did however point out that it was not party tradition for the deputy president to be appointed the disciplinary bureau chief, in reference to the appointment of Datuk Ng Cheng Kiat instead of Soi Lek.

Soi Lek has been appointed head of the relatively unimportant position of head of the party's government policy monitoring bureau.

The party No 2 also said yesterday that he would leave it to the members to decide if Tee Keat's appointments will help the party close ranks or whether it is to strengthen his own grip on MCA.
(above picked from http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/index.php/malaysia/12352-wounds-open-up-again-in-mca)
Malaysiakini listing ...

Prelude of MCA Internal Conflict episod 6 马华 . 笼里鸡 前奏6

23rd November Malaysiaparty 's [NOW] News of Week
(picked from Malaysiakini.com) : http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/93440

11月23日 党讯精選
(转摘自《当今大马》 Malaysiakini ) : http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/93440

B队大翻盘李金狮势力反扑？
马华党争20年恩怨或一朝了
李伟伦 11月20日 下午2点58分

马华党争不断上演，从最早期的林苍佑与陈祯禄之争、林敬益与陈修信的决裂，李三春与曾永森的对决，又或是最激烈的梁陈党争，到近年的李金狮与林良实之争，和A、B队党争，处处可见派系激斗的斑斑血迹。

在刚落幕的马华党选后，新任总会长翁诗杰公布了一份令人意想不到的党职名单，把其副手蔡细历和前总会长黄家定兄弟的势力，摒弃在主流之外，惟此举却可能新一轮的党争种下祸根。

该份要职名单更是引起种种揣测，有者说名单中的受委领袖多属前署理总会长陈广才的人马，也有人指这其实是比陈广才更早期的前署理总会长李金狮势力的翻盘。

在马华党内外仍密切关注翁蔡的互动之际，熟悉马华的资深媒体人陈利良（左图）一针见血地点出，与其说马华将掀起一场翁蔡的恩怨之争，倒不如说这可能是一场历来党争的总算帐，20年恩怨一朝了。

20年党争总帐应如何算？

“其实这不止是翁与蔡两人的权职分配，或恩怨之争，可能这是20年来的一次总算帐。我们看到黄俊杰（新任纪律委员会主席）18年未曾回过马华，但他今天回来了。”

陈利良抛出一个疑问说：“如果李金狮也回来的话，是不是要把马华的恩怨拉回到80年代，梁维泮跟陈群川党争的时期呢？”

他表示，马华20年党争的总账不易算，可能连利息也未算好，下一届全国大选便已杀到，这究竟要如何处理，颇令人关注。

马华领袖也踊跃出席讲座

陈利良也是《东方日报》助理总编辑，他是在昨晚于隆雪华堂举办的《翁蔡配，马华新时代的来临？！》讲座会上，如此分析11月11日党选后的马华局势。

该讲座会由隆雪华青和《东方日报》所联办，共有4名主讲人。除了陈利良外，尚包括已宣告解散的“马华救党委员会”发起人汤木、韩江学院名誉院长谢诗坚，以及为《当今大马》撰写《马华公会的哀歌》系列评论文章的时评员迦玛鲁丁。

这场讲座反应热烈，共吸引约120名公众踊跃出席，其中不乏一些马华领袖、区会主席和中央代表，包括中委卢诚国和前副总会长叶炳汉也前来聆听。

B队翻盘十年风水轮流转

陈利良表示，该套排阵显示10年风水轮流转，当年在A、B队党争时期处于劣势的B队人马，如今已全面翻盘。

“当年林亚礼（B队前署理总会长）的角色如今由蔡细历顶上去，而翁诗杰就扮演林良实（A队前总会长）的角色。”

“还有如马青总团长魏家祥等人，当年都是属于B队的人马，这是一个很明显的翻盘。”

包含各派“怪阵”难以整合

陈利良也形容，该份容纳了各大派系人马的要职名单，是一个“怪阵”。有鉴于此，他认为，这或将加深翁诗杰整合团队的难度。

“不管是新阵容或中央代表，都拥有各门各派的人马，包括黄家定、陈广才、翁诗杰或者蔡细历的死忠派，还有一些不知道谁的属将。”

“更加深整合难度的是，翁诗杰是一名独行侠。他不是一名惯于合作的人，新出炉的团队，也不是他过往习惯合作的对象。”

翁诗杰名单掀起种种揣测

曾任李金狮政治秘书的翁诗杰，是在11月11日公布新届中委会阵容和各州联委会主席名单。

在该份名单中，多名重返政治主流的领袖，都与李金狮带上关系。掌握纪律大铡的黄俊杰曾是陈群川时代的总秘书，被视为是李金狮的头号大将。纪委会副主席
刘文丰则在80年代时，担任时任马青总团长李金狮的署理总团长。

此外，受委副总秘书的陆垠佑与媳妇终熬成婆的受委中委黄福安，都与李金狮的关系密切。

与此同时，在该份要职名单中，尚包括多名被视为是陈广才旧属的领袖，如受委总秘书的王茀明和受委组织秘书的姚伟豪等，结果传出陈广才在幕后操盘的传言。

马上得罪林黄蔡元老四派

对于翁诗杰的“怪阵”，谢诗坚（左图）则表示，翁诗杰如今是一下子得罪了4派人马，即林良实、黄家定、蔡细历和元老派。

他发出警告说，若这4股势力结合，翁诗杰便很难推行其改革任务。

不过他建议，翁诗杰可仿效第4任总会长李三春的做法，把枪头对外，以树立功绩，免却遭党内势力反扑的危机。

“我相信翁诗杰第一炮就会打民主行动党，此举旨在告诉党员，马华的敌人在外，不是在内。”

“只要翁诗杰继续把矛头一直对外，既向巫统要求平权，又炮打行动党的话，蔡细历又怎能挑起内斗？”

需在1年内落实直选总会长

翁诗杰能否落后马华改革任务，也成了能否安抚党内不满势力的关键。曾扮演“倒黄”急先锋的汤木表示，翁诗杰务必要在最长1年的时限内，落实其竞选宣言中，提到的直选总会长等改革建议。

“翁诗杰一定要让党员看到他的改革诚意。至于他原本的基层实力不强，倒不是关键，因为当选了总会长后，就有基层自动来找你。”

若不转型马华将进孝恩园

另一名主讲人迦玛鲁丁（左图）则直接表示，马华的人事纠葛如今已不是关键，更应关注的是能否成功转型，走出巫统的种族政治阴影。

他以经营孝恩园的马华党校副校长王琛发为调侃对象说：“若马华不能转型成功，为自己留一条后路，就只能准备进孝恩园，与巫统陪葬。”

(above picked from http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/93440)

Prelude of MCA Internal Conflict episod 5 马华 . 笼里鸡 前奏5

23rd November Malaysiaparty 's [NOW] News of Week
(picked from Malaysiakini.com) : http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/93430

11月23日 党讯精選
(转摘自《当今大马》 Malaysiakini ) : http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/93430

翁诗杰马华“怪阵”酝酿暗流
号召特大手机短讯折射不满
李伟伦 11月20日 下午1点02分

马华总会长翁诗杰“不按牌理出牌”委任党内要职的排阵，除了引爆与其副手蔡细历的隔空交锋外，据说也已在党内掀起了一股不满的暗流。

据了解，在翁诗杰于11月11日宣布新阵容名单后，马华党内已流传各种各样的手机短讯和流言，绘声绘影地指各州联委会，正准备召开特别代表大会（特大），反对中委会的新阵容。

在众多流传的短讯中，其中一封以英文书写的短讯内容翻译如下：

“各州都不满翁诗杰的排阵，所以我们将合作组成一支队伍，召开一项特大来杯葛他。”

对此，一名来自柔佛州的基层领袖告诉《当今大马》，一批不满马华新阵容的领袖，目前正在各州积极走动，计划号召一场特大向翁诗杰发难。

他拒绝透露有关特大的详情，只表示迄今尚属初步阶段，也不确定有关特大的提案究竟仅是针对中委会的新阵容，或者是要直接弹劾翁诗杰的领导。

柔霹雪槟的不满情绪最高

他声称，党内目前可说是“暗流汹涌”，特别是在柔佛、霹雳、雪兰莪和槟城4州，不满的情绪更是高涨。

“我本身是没有收到任何的手机短讯，但却有人透过电话直接联络我，讨论有关课题。”

“不过目前一切仍未具体，我只能说，在酝酿中。”

不满者密切关注下两步棋

不过这名基层领袖承认，计划中的特大是否能成事，还是未知数，因为不满者目前仍抱着观望的态度，密切关注翁诗杰的下两步棋。

“大家都还在等待，等的是翁诗杰的官职安排。大家要看蔡细历会否受委官职，而且还要研究各州联委会的新阵容，是否有排除异己。”

“我们都不知道翁诗杰的葫芦里卖的是什么药，且让我们看了药后再决定。”

雪霹基层领袖：纯属谣言

虽然串联号召开特大的短讯及流言疑幻似真，不过《当今大马》向数名来自雪州和霹州的基层领袖求证时，却被告知召开特大一事，纯属谣言。

一名霹州领袖表示，虽然他早已听闻有关特大的流言，但迄今却未受任何人接洽，讨论相关事宜。

“我也询问一些霹雳州和雪州的领袖，甚至询问了数名蔡细历派系的人马，不过他们都说没有这项指示（号召开特大）。”

无论如何，他坦言，在马华新阵容出炉后，数个“大州”的基层普遍上确感不满，更有传闻指称霹州及森州的基层，准备展开“倒主席”的行动。

翁诗杰承认手机短讯频流传

翁诗杰本身早前承认，在马华中委会新阵容公布后，党内确实流传许多具“恐吓性”和“谎言”的手机短讯。

他说，虽然本身并没收到相关短讯，但却已知晓这些短讯的流传，并形容这些短讯“具困扰性”。他也强调，一切都必须按照党章进行。

获三分之一支持可开特大

根据马华党章第30条款，特大可在4种情况下随时举行，即：
（一）由总会长指示；
（二）至少三分之一的中委会成员以书面正式要求；
（三）至少三分之一的代表大会成员以书面提出正式要求；及
（四）如果超过三分之二或更多的中委会成员同时停职，剩下的成员必须在最短30天内召开特大，以选出新中委会阵容。

家泉幕僚：并非不可能任务

根据以上条件，若不满翁诗杰领导者，成功在柔、霹、雪和槟4大马华票仓获得支持，召开特大并非不可能的事。

马华前总会长黄家定的幕僚，目前担任黄家定胞兄黄家泉部门新闻秘书的吴健南，在其部落格上分析此事时，也说召开特大的可能性是存在的。

“根据党章，召开特大需召集1/3代表签名，大约800人。若根据诗杰在党选获得的约60%选票作准，加上党职委任所引起的部分基层情绪，此标竿并非mission impossible（不可能的任务）。”

在刚落幕的马华党选中，翁诗杰虽然不断呼吁中央代表给予更强委托，以落实改革马华重担，不过他仅以61%得票率险胜前卫生部长蔡锐明。而蔡锐明在阔别主流政治三年后，依然获得39%的得票率，比2005年党选对垒黄家定时的35%更高，显示党内仍有一股不容忽视的反当权派势力。

森州新排阵堡垒分明掀反弹

翁诗杰在本月11日揭橥的党职名单中，宣示马华各州联委会主席大换血，共有9个州属的联委会主席遭到撤换。

仅有槟州主席廖中莱、彭州主席何启文、丹州主席黄燕燕和沙州主席丘克海保留原职；来自雪州的马华妇女组主席周美芬以及柔佛州的马青总团长魏家祥，则“飞象过河”，分别出掌玻璃市与马六甲州。

除了州主席大换血，各州联委会的阵容预料也将出现“大风吹”。由森州主席姚再添昨天率先公布的新任的州联委会名单中，36个职位便出现了近80%的人选变动，仅有7人保留原职。

之前一度被视为州主席人选的尤绰韬，此次只被为委员职。更引起揣测的是，姚再添昨日召开的记者会，派系堡垒之分，出席者以姚营支持者占大多数，而非姚派的领袖只有新任副主席赖日辉和州内唯一马华行政议员萧进平两人。

翁诗杰此次委任各州主席，被指为提拔许多在党内耕耘多年，却苦无上位机会的地方领袖。在雪州，他更是空降来自登州的新任总秘书王茀明坐镇。结果在这种“怪阵”的安排下，首当其冲的肯定是势力盘根的各地诸侯，并酝酿一种负面的情绪。森州的不满如今已初见端倪，至于会否蔓延至其他州属乃至中央，或许在翁诗杰公布接下来的官职名单后，将会彰显.
(above picked from http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/93430)